Mobile Phone Radiation Induces Reactive Oxygen Species Production and DNA Damage in Human Spermatozoa In Vitro

Background In recent times there has been some controversy over the impact of electromagnetic radiation on human health. The significance of mobile phone radiation on male reproduction is a key element of this debate since several studies have suggested a relationship between mobile phone use and semen quality. The potential mechanisms involved have not been established, however, human spermatozoa are known to be particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress by virtue of the abundant availability of substrates for free radical attack and the lack of cytoplasmic space to accommodate antioxidant enzymes. Moreover, the induction of oxidative stress in these cells not only perturbs their capacity for fertilization but also contributes to sperm DNA damage. The latter has, in turn, been linked with poor fertility, an increased incidence of miscarriage and morbidity in the offspring, including childhood cancer. In light of these associations, we have analyzed the influence of RF-EMR on the cell biology of human spermatozoa in vitro. Principal Findings Purified human spermatozoa were exposed to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) tuned to 1.8 GHz and covering a range of specific absorption rates (SAR) from 0.4 W/kg to 27.5 W/kg. In step with increasing SAR, motility and vitality were significantly reduced after RF-EMR exposure, while the mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species and DNA fragmentation were significantly elevated (P<0.001). Furthermore, we also observed highly significant relationships between SAR, the oxidative DNA damage bio-marker, 8-OH-dG, and DNA fragmentation after RF-EMR exposure. Conclusions RF-EMR in both the power density and frequency range of mobile phones enhances mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation by human spermatozoa, decreasing the motility and vitality of these cells while stimulating DNA base adduct formation and, ultimately DNA fragmentation. These findings have clear implications for the safety of extensive mobile phone use by males of reproductive age, potentially affecting both their fertility and the health and wellbeing of their offspring.

[1]  C. Ong,et al.  Detection of oxidative DNA damage in human sperm and its association with sperm function and male infertility. , 2000, Free radical biology & medicine.

[2]  D. Franken,et al.  Chromatin Packaging as an Indicator of Human Sperm Dysfunction , 2000, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[3]  R. Aitken,et al.  Seeds of concern , 2004, Nature.

[4]  J. Mcnamee,et al.  Cylindrical waveguide applicator for in vitro exposure of cell culture samples to 1.9‐GHz radiofrequency fields , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[5]  R. Aitken,et al.  Multiple forms of redox activity in populations of human spermatozoa. , 2003, Molecular human reproduction.

[6]  D. C. Joseph Methods in mammalian embryology , 1971 .

[7]  A. Pál,et al.  IS THERE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CELL PHONE USE AND SEMEN QUALITY? , 2005, Archives of andrology.

[8]  Ashok Agarwal,et al.  Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  Cindy Sage,et al.  Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. , 2008, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[10]  R. John Aitken,et al.  Just how safe is assisted reproductive technology for treating male factor infertility , 2008 .

[11]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Cell phones and male infertility: dissecting the relationship. , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[12]  R. Aitken,et al.  Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. , 2008, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[13]  Lennart Hardell,et al.  MOBILE TELEPHONES AND CANCER—A REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[14]  R. Aitken,et al.  DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy , 2005, Cell and Tissue Research.

[15]  Jukka Juutilainen,et al.  Proliferation, Oxidative Stress and Cell Death in Cells Exposed to 872 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation and Oxidants , 2008, Radiation research.

[16]  T. Turner,et al.  On the Epididymis and its Role in the Development of the Fertile Ejaculate , 1994 .

[17]  W K Whitten,et al.  The culture of mouse embryos in vitro. , 1971 .

[18]  R. Aitken,et al.  Definitive evidence for the nonmitochondrial production of superoxide anion by human spermatozoa. , 2006, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[19]  Rony Seger,et al.  Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. , 2007, The Biochemical journal.

[20]  Roy Jones,et al.  Peroxidative breakdown of phospholipids in human spermatozoa, spermicidal properties of fatty acid peroxides, and protective action of seminal plasma. , 1979, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  R John Aitken,et al.  Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[22]  R. Aitken,et al.  Generation of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and human sperm function. , 1989, Biology of reproduction.

[23]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Theoretical evaluation of voltage inducement on internal membranes of biological cells exposed to electric fields. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[24]  R. Aitken,et al.  Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. , 2005, International journal of andrology.

[25]  D. Conway,et al.  Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. , 1985, British medical journal.

[26]  D. Evenson,et al.  Meta-analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using the sperm chromatin structure assay. , 2006, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[27]  E. Holmes,et al.  Oxidative DNA damage precedes DNA fragmentation after experimental stroke in rat brain , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[28]  R. Aitken,et al.  Biological and clinical significance of DNA damage in the male germ line. , 2009, International journal of andrology.

[29]  D. Kretser,et al.  Male infertility: the case for continued research , 2001, The Medical journal of Australia.

[30]  Y. Ménézo,et al.  Evaluating human sperm DNA integrity: relationship between 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine quantification and the sperm chromatin structure assay , 2003, Zygote.

[31]  Ashok Agarwal,et al.  Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[32]  Sajal Gupta,et al.  The role of free radicals and antioxidants in reproduction , 2006, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[33]  E. Arriaga,et al.  Analysis of mitochondria isolated from single cells , 2006, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.