Performance of iterative gradient-based algorithms with different intensity change models in digital image correlation

Abstract Digital image correlation (DIC) is a non-contact and powerful tool for whole-field displacement and strain measurement in modern optical metrology. In the DIC technique, the gradient-based algorithm is one of the most commonly used sub-pixel registration algorithms due to its effectiveness and accuracy. Thus, this algorithm has been further investigated and improved by many researchers to increase its accuracy. In the existing gradient-based algorithms, there are three relation models for the gray level intensity of a point in the undeformed and deformed images: namely the constant intensity model, the linear intensity change model and the non-linear intensity change model. However, little quantitative investigation has been conducted to compare their performance. In this paper, three iterative gradient-based algorithms are given using the corresponding intensity change model and the iterative least squares (ILS) solving method. The accuracy, robustness and computational efficiency of the three algorithms for intensity variation are investigated through numerical simulation experiments. The experimental results reveal that the algorithm generated using the non-linear intensity change model is the most accurate, robust and efficient of the three algorithms and the algorithms generated using the linear and non-linear intensity change models have approximately the same accuracy when the intensity variation is small between undeformed and deformed images.

[1]  Ajay Mahajan,et al.  Measurement of Whole-Field Surface Displacements and Strain Using a Genetic Algorithm Based Intelligent Image Correlation Method , 2004 .

[2]  Qing-Hua Huang,et al.  An optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based air jet indentation system for measuring the mechanical properties of soft tissues , 2009, Measurement science & technology.

[3]  M. Sutton,et al.  Full-field speckle pattern image correlation with B-Spline deformation function , 2002 .

[4]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[5]  Xiao-yong Liu,et al.  Study on Digital Image Correlation Using Artificial Neural Networks for Subpixel Displacement Measurement , 2010 .

[6]  D J Chen,et al.  Digital speckle-displacement measurement using a complex spectrum method. , 1993, Applied optics.

[7]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation (DISC) , 2001 .

[8]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction , 1989 .

[9]  Xie Huimin,et al.  Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation , 2006 .

[10]  Xiaoqi Li,et al.  A novel coarse-fine search scheme for digital image correlation method , 2006 .

[11]  Min Wang,et al.  A weighting window applied to the digital image correlation method , 2009 .

[12]  Hugh A. Bruck,et al.  Pointwise digital image correlation using genetic algorithms , 2005 .

[13]  A. Asundi,et al.  Digital image correlation using iterative least squares and pointwise least squares for displacement field and strain field measurements , 2009 .

[14]  S. Roux,et al.  “Finite-Element” Displacement Fields Analysis from Digital Images: Application to Portevin–Le Châtelier Bands , 2006 .

[15]  Pengwan Chen,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of a speckle pattern in the digital image correlation method by mean subset fluctuation , 2011 .

[16]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method , 1983, Image Vis. Comput..

[17]  A. Voloshin,et al.  In-plane strain measurement by digital image correlation , 2003 .

[18]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing using MATLAB , 2006 .

[19]  Tamal Bose,et al.  Digital Signal and Image Processing , 2003 .

[20]  Franccois Hild,et al.  Digital Image Correlation: from Displacement Measurement to Identification of Elastic Properties – a Review , 2006 .

[21]  M Pitter,et al.  Subpixel microscopic deformation analysis using correlation and artificial neural networks. , 2001, Optics express.

[22]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Application of an improved subpixel registration algorithm on digital speckle correlation measurement , 2003 .

[23]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[24]  D. M. Freeman,et al.  Statistics of subpixel registration algorithms based on spatiotemporal gradients or block matching , 1998 .

[25]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics , 1985 .