Effect of polymer adsorption on cellulose nanofibril water binding capacity and aggregation

Polymer adsorption on cellulose nanofibrils and the effect on nanofibril water binding capacity were studied using cellulose nanofibril films together with quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The experiments were performed in the immersed state, and special attention was paid to the effect of polymer properties on the water content and viscoelastic properties of the polymer/fibril layer. The dry mass of the adsorbed polymers was determined using SPR. The type of the adsorbed polymer strongly affected the water content and viscoelastic properties of the nanofibril film. The adsorption of a highly charged flocculating polymer, PDADMAC, caused dehydration of the film, which was also detected as nanofibril film stiffening. The adsorption of xyloglucan introduced a dispersing effect to the nanofibril film, which was detected as a loosening and softening of the nanofibril/polymer layer. A dispersing effect was also achieved with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), but CMC did not adsorb irreversibly on the nanofibril surfaces. In addition to the nanofibril film studies, the effect of polymer adsorption on cellulose nanofibril suspension aggregation was demonstrated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Xyloglucan was shown to open the nanofibril aggregate structures and act as a dispersing agent, whereas the other polymers studied did not have as significant an effect on aggregation.

[1]  T. Ven A model for the adsorption of polyelectrolytes on pulp fibers: Relation between fiber structure and polyelectrolyte properties , 2000 .

[2]  K. R. Sandberg,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential , 1983 .

[3]  P. Claesson,et al.  Buildup of polyelectrolyte multilayers of polyethyleneimine and microfibrillated cellulose studied by in situ dual-polarization interferometry and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[4]  S. Notley Effect of introduced charge in cellulose gels on surface interactions and the adsorption of highly charged cationic polyelectrolytes. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[5]  G. Sauerbrey,et al.  The use of quarts oscillators for weighing thin layers and for microweighing , 1959 .

[6]  Leena‐Sisko Johansson,et al.  Model films from native cellulose nanofibrils. Preparation, swelling, and surface interactions. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[7]  Luciano Beghello,et al.  Some factors that influence fiber flocculation , 1998 .

[8]  Vandeven A model for the adsorption of polyelectrolytes on pulp fibers: Relation between fiber structure and polyelectrolyte properties , 2000 .

[9]  Lucian A. Lucia,et al.  CELLULOSIC NANOCOMPOSITES: A REVIEW , 2008 .

[10]  O. Ikkala,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[11]  Eero Kontturi,et al.  Cellulose—Model Films and the Fundamental Approach , 2007 .

[12]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Energy Dissipation Kinetics for Protein and Antibody−Antigen Adsorption under Shear Oscillation on a Quartz Crystal Microbalance , 1998 .

[13]  Dieter Klemm,et al.  Nanocelluloses as Innovative Polymers in Research and Application , 2006 .

[14]  Fredrik Höök,et al.  Quartz crystal microbalance setup for frequency and Q‐factor measurements in gaseous and liquid environments , 1995 .

[15]  M. Nydén,et al.  Adsorption behavior and cross-linking of EHEC and HM-EHEC at hydrophilic and hydrophobic modified surfaces monitored by SPR and QCM-D. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  R. Schasfoort,et al.  Handbook of surface plasmon resonance , 2008 .

[17]  Paul Gatenholm,et al.  Modification of nanocellulose with a xyloglucan-RGD conjugate enhances adhesion and proliferation of endothelial cells: implications for tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[18]  Tom Lindström,et al.  Some ways to decrease fibre suspension flocculation and improve sheet formation , 2006 .

[19]  J. Hamilton,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility , 1983 .

[20]  Leena‐Sisko Johansson,et al.  Nonleaching antimicrobial films prepared from surface-modified microfibrillated cellulose. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[21]  A. Bausch,et al.  Hydration and internal properties of polyelectrolyte multilayers , 2007 .

[22]  J. Laine,et al.  Studies on topochemical modification of cellulosic fibres , 2003 .

[23]  M. Österberg,et al.  Properties of Cationic Polyelectrolyte Layers Adsorbed on Silica and Cellulose Surfaces Studied by QCM-D—Effect of Polyelectrolyte Charge Density and Molecular Weight , 2009 .

[24]  L. Wågberg,et al.  Polyelectrolyte adsorption onto cellulose fibres – A review , 2000 .

[25]  M. Österberg,et al.  Cellulose nanofibrils—adsorption with poly(amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive , 2008 .

[26]  P. Stenius,et al.  Water‐in‐oil Emulsions Stabilized by Hydrophobized Microfibrillated Cellulose , 2007 .

[27]  Magnus Norgren,et al.  The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.