4.5.4 Dialogic design for the intelligent enterprise: Collaborative strategy, process, and action

Dialogic design provides efficient, reliable approaches for organizations to envision and implement cohesive, comprehensive, and compelling roadmaps for enterprise evolution. Using structured dialogue to integrate the collective intelligence of stakeholders, we produce a shared representation of the intelligent enterprise, enabling “organizing around intellect.” Dialogic design is progressive in focus, scaling from strategic vision to business process design to system requirements, mapping each level's priorities to successive requirements. Each focus inquiry iterates from deep problem understanding, to generative solution design, through consensus action planning. We applied Structured Dialogic Design to the transformation of a small consultancy, with findings applicable to any enterprise. The process efficiently enables a democratic, collaborative approach to redesign of socio-organizational systems and practices, using a software-supported collaborative process. It efficiently achieves true consensus on organizational and business strategy, resolves multiple conflicts of values and resource decisions, and determines the most effective priorities while preventing groupthink errors.

[1]  Yasai-Ardekani,et al.  Contextual Determinants of Strategic Planning Processes , 1997 .

[2]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[3]  P. Drucker.  The new society of organizations. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[4]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Crisis and foundations: an inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the information systems discipline , 1998, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Peter Jones.  A methodology and system for designing organizational ontologies: Using knowledge-based tools for constructing organizational knowledge , 2000 .

[6]  El-Sayed Abou-Zeid,et al.  Knowledge Management and Business Strategies: Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Research , 2007 .

[7]  James Brian Quinn.  Strategy, Science and Management , 2002 .

[8]  Peter H. Jones.  Socializing a Knowledge Strategy , 2007 .

[9]  El-Sayed Abou-Zeid,et al.  Towards a cultural ontology for interorganizational knowledge processes , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[10]  Richard Sotto,et al.  The virtual organisation , 1997 .

[11]  P. Checkland.  From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[12]  Norma R. A. Romm,et al.  Co-laboratories of Democracy: How People Harness Their Collective Wisdom and Power to Construct the Future , 2006 .

[13]  E. Jantsch.  Perspectives of Planning. , 1969 .

[14]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Establishing the Business of the Future:: the Role of Organizational Architecture and Information Technologies , 2003 .

[15]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[16]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Twenty laws of complexity: science applicable in organizations , 1999 .

[17]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[18]  G. C. Alexander.  Interactive Management: An Emancipatory Methodology , 2002 .

[19]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Idealized design: Creative corporate visioning , 1993 .

[20]  G. D. Zeeuw.  THREE PHASES OF SCIENCE: A METHODOLOGICAL EXPLORATION1 , 2001 .

[21]  R. Charan,et al.  How networks reshape organizations--for results. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[22]  Bela H. Banathy,et al.  Designing social systems in a changing world , 1996 .

[23]  Yannis M. Ioannides.  On the architecture of complex organizations , 1987 .

[24]  John N. Warfield,et al.  An Introduction to Systems Science , 2006 .

[25]  Theo Vurdubakis,et al.  VISIONS OF ORGANIZATION AND ORGANIZATIONS OF VISION: THE REPRESENTATIONAL PRACTICES OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT , 1997 .

[26]  Peter H. Jones.  Book Review: How People Harness Their Collective Wisdom and Power to Construct the Future in Co-Laboratories of Democracy , 2007 .

[27]  John P. Kotter,et al.  Why Transformation Efforts Fail , 1996 .

[28]  William B. Rouse,et al.  A theory of enterprise transformation , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[29]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.