The Influence of Contour on Similarity Perception of Star Glyphs

We conducted three experiments to investigate the effects of contours on the detection of data similarity with star glyph variations. A star glyph is a small, compact, data graphic that represents a multi-dimensional data point. Star glyphs are often used in small-multiple settings, to represent data points in tables, on maps, or as overlays on other types of data graphics. In these settings, an important task is the visual comparison of the data points encoded in the star glyph, for example to find other similar data points or outliers. We hypothesized that for data comparisons, the overall shape of a star glyph-enhanced through contour lines-would aid the viewer in making accurate similarity judgments. To test this hypothesis, we conducted three experiments. In our first experiment, we explored how the use of contours influenced how visualization experts and trained novices chose glyphs with similar data values. Our results showed that glyphs without contours make the detection of data similarity easier. Given these results, we conducted a second study to understand intuitive notions of similarity. Star glyphs without contours most intuitively supported the detection of data similarity. In a third experiment, we tested the effect of star glyph reference structures (i.e., tickmarks and gridlines) on the detection of similarity. Surprisingly, our results show that adding reference structures does improve the correctness of similarity judgments for star glyphs with contours, but not for the standard star glyph. As a result of these experiments, we conclude that the simple star glyph without contours performs best under several criteria, reinforcing its practice and popularity in the literature. Contours seem to enhance the detection of other types of similarity, e. g., shape similarity and are distracting when data similarity has to be judged. Based on these findings we provide design considerations regarding the use of contours and reference structures on star glyphs.

[1]  Ingwer Borg,et al.  Performance of Snow Flakes, Suns, and Factorial Suns in the Graphical Representation of Multivariate Data , 1992 .

[2]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  A Taxonomy of Glyph Placement Strategies for Multidimensional Data Visualization , 2002, Inf. Vis..

[3]  Chris Weaver,et al.  Star Plots: How Shape Characteristics Influence Classification Tasks , 2009 .

[4]  Min Chen,et al.  MatchPad: Interactive Glyph‐Based Visualization for Real‐Time Sports Performance Analysis , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[5]  James Elder,et al.  The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes , 1993, Vision Research.

[6]  S. Zucker,et al.  Evidence for boundary-specific grouping , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  Tobias Isenberg,et al.  Evaluating Sketchiness as a Visual Variable for the Depiction of Qualitative Uncertainty , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[9]  Johannes Fuchs,et al.  ClockMap: Enhancing Circular Treemaps with Temporal Glyphs for Time-Series Data , 2012, EuroVis.

[10]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[11]  H. Barlow.  Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology by Stephen E. Palmer , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Johannes Fuchs,et al.  Monitoring large IP spaces with ClockView , 2011, VizSec '11.

[13]  G. Andrienko,et al.  Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data , 2013 .

[14]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design , 2010, CHI.

[15]  Maureen C. Stone,et al.  The Effect of Colour and Transparency on the Perception of Overlaid Grids , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  Clutter Reduction in Multi-Dimensional Data Visualization Using Dimension Reordering , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.

[17]  Stephen Michael Kosslyn,et al.  Graph Design for the Eye and Mind , 2006 .

[18]  Naomi B. Robbins,et al.  Creating More Effective Graphs , 2004 .

[19]  H. P. Friedman,et al.  The surgical implications of physiologic patterns in myocardial infarction shock. , 1972, Surgery.

[20]  Michael Friendly,et al.  A.-M. Guerry's Moral Statistics of France: Challenges for Multivariable Spatial Analysis. , 2007, 0801.4263.

[21]  Min Chen,et al.  Glyph-based Visualization: Foundations, Design Guidelines, Techniques and Applications , 2013, Eurographics.

[22]  Patrick Garrigan,et al.  The Effect of Contour Closure on Shape Recognition , 2012, Perception.

[23]  Georges G. Grinstein,et al.  Iconographic Displays For Visualizing Multidimensional Data , 1988, Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  Petra Isenberg,et al.  Evaluation of alternative glyph designs for time series data in a small multiple setting , 2013, CHI.

[25]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Chernoff Faces, Star Glyphs, and Spatial Visualisations for Binary Data , 2003, InVis.au.

[26]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  Multivariate Data Glyphs: Principles and Practice , 2008 .

[27]  Leland Wilkinson,et al.  An experimental evaluation of multivariate graphical point representations , 1982, CHI '82.

[28]  D M Levi,et al.  The effect of contour closure on shape perception. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[29]  M. A. Porter,et al.  Graphical Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1988 .

[30]  Timo Ropinski,et al.  Glyph-Based SPECT Visualization for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.