Opportunities and challenges for studying disaster survivors

Studying survivors of natural disasters and traumatic events provides a unique opportunity to address some of the important and difficult questions in psychology and other social sciences. However, such an opportunity does not come without challenges. Several methodological challenges to studying survivors of natural disasters are discussed, including recruiting participants, choosing appropriate procedures, and the safety of data collectors. Several ethical issues are also presented, such as the ability of participants to make decisions, the impact of participating, and the importance of informed consent. In addition, approaches are suggested that help to deal with these methodological and ethical challenges. We conclude that while attention must be focused on methodological and ethical considerations, research stemming from natural disasters should be employed to answer important basic and applied conceptual questions and address issues of practice and policy, while assuring that steps have been taken to protect participants and that the potential risks are minimal.

[1]  K. Dyregrov,et al.  Refugee Families' Experience of Research Participation , 2000, Journal of traumatic stress.

[2]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  C. Levine.  The Concept of Vulnerability in Disaster Research , 2004, Journal of traumatic stress.

[4]  S. Borja,et al.  Ethical Issues Pertaining to Research in the Aftermath of Disaster , 2004, Journal of traumatic stress.

[5]  D. Kaloupek,et al.  The Risks and Benefits of Participating in Trauma-Focused Research Studies , 2004, Journal of traumatic stress.

[6]  G. Macdonald,et al.  Adding insult to injury: Social pain theory and response to social exclusion , 2005 .

[7]  Hongtu Chen,et al.  Brief Report: The Emotional Distress in a Community After the Terrorist Attack on the World Trade Center , 2003, Community Mental Health Journal.

[8]  Valerie F. Reyna,et al.  Memory interference and misinformation effects , 1995 .

[9]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Ostracism: The Power of Silence , 2001 .

[10]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  Lorne Campbell,et al.  Estimating Actor, Partner, and Interaction Effects for Dyadic Data Using PROC MIXED and HLM: A User–Friendly Guide , 2002 .

[12]  Michael W. Bridges,et al.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  K. Dyregrov.  Bereaved parents' experience of research participation. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[14]  W. Gardner,et al.  The Social Monitoring System: Enhanced Sensitivity to Social Cues as an Adaptive Response to Social Exclusion. , 2005 .

[15]  Debra A. Poole,et al.  Two years later: Effect of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. , 1993 .

[16]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[17]  John Desmond Langley,et al.  On the remembrance of things past': a longitudinal evaluation of the retrospective method , 1994 .

[18]  J. Panksepp.  Textbook of Biological Psychiatry , 2003 .

[19]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  V. Reyna,et al.  Development of Gist versus Verbatim Memory in Sentence Recognition: Effects of Lexical Familiarity, Semantic Content, Encoding Instructions, and Retention Interval. , 1994 .

[22]  D. Rosenstein.  Decision-Making Capacity and Disaster Research , 2004, Journal of traumatic stress.

[23]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  F. Norris,et al.  60,000 Disaster Victims Speak: Part I. An Empirical Review of the Empirical Literature, 1981—2001 , 2002, Psychiatry.

[26]  M. Henderson,et al.  The willingness of palliative care patients to participate in research. , 2005, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[27]  Robert Kevin Grigsby,et al.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects , 1993, Research on social work practice.

[28]  M. Leary,et al.  Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  W. Graziano,et al.  Unknown Words in Self-Reported Personality: Lethargic and Provincial in Texas , 1998 .

[30]  R. Loewenstein,et al.  Distress in Response to and Perceived Usefulness of Trauma Research Interviews , 2003 .

[31]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 2001 , 2004, Psychological science.

[32]  N. Kassam-Adams,et al.  Child and parent reactions to participation in clinical research. , 2005, General hospital psychiatry.

[33]  E. B. Zechmeister,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology. , 1990 .

[34]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .