Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

UNLABELLED We investigated radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations at 4 hospitals equipped with different tomographs. METHODS Patient doses were estimated by using established dose coefficients for 18F-FDG and from thermoluminescent measurements performed on an anthropomorphic whole-body phantom. RESULTS The most relevant difference between the protocols examined was the incorporation of CT as part of the combined PET/CT examination: Separate low-dose CT scans were acquired at 2 hospitals for attenuation correction of emission data in addition to a contrast-enhanced CT scan for diagnostic evaluation, whereas, at the other sites, contrast-enhanced CT scans were used for both purposes. Nevertheless, the effective dose per PET/CT examination was similar, about 25 mSv. CONCLUSION The dosimetric concepts presented in this study provide a valuable tool for the optimization of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT protocols. Further reduction of patient exposure can be achieved by modifications to the existing hardware and software of PET/CT systems.

[1]  Icrp.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1991 .

[2]  Steven M. Larson,et al.  PET/CT: a new imaging technology in nuclear medicine , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  G. Brix,et al.  Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study , 2004, European Radiology.

[5]  David W Townsend,et al.  PET/CT today and tomorrow. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  M. Galanski,et al.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey , 2003, European Radiology.

[7]  R. Wahl,et al.  PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner: the path to true image fusion. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  To enhance or not to enhance? 18F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Icrp.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals , 1988 .

[12]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography--imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[13]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[14]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  D W Townsend,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[16]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[17]  T. Beyer,et al.  Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  R L Wahl,et al.  Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  Tung-Hsin Wu,et al.  Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.