Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension

This study provides evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension. By reanalyzing data from a syntactic priming experiment (Thothathiri & Snedeker, 2008), we find that the error signal associated with a syntactic prime influences comprehenders' subsequent syntactic expectations. This follows directly from error-based implicit learning accounts of syntactic priming, but it is unexpected under accounts that consider syntactic priming a consequence of temporary increases in base-level activation. More generally, the results raise questions about the principles underlying the maintenance of implicit statistical knowledge relevant to language processing, and about possible functional motivations for syntactic priming.

[1]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[2]  Gaurav Malhotra,et al.  Dynamics of structural priming , 2009 .

[3]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? , 2010, Cognition.

[4]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Crowdsourcing and language studies: the new generation of linguistic data , 2010, Mturk@HLT-NAACL.

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[7]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience , 2013, Cognition.

[8]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all , 2003 .

[10]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[13]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[14]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming , 2006, Cognition.

[15]  Patricia J. Brooks,et al.  Exploring language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction☆ , 1990 .

[16]  Tessa Bent,et al.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech , 2008, Cognition.

[17]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  Optimal Processing Times in Reading: A Formal Model and Empirical Investigation , 2008 .

[20]  Frank Keller,et al.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[22]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Long and short term cumulative structural priming effects , 2014, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[23]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Bob McMurray,et al.  Cue Integration With Categories: Weighting Acoustic Cues in Speech Using Unsupervised Learning and Distributional Statistics , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers , 2007 .

[27]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[29]  William S Horton,et al.  The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming , 2007, Language and cognitive processes.

[30]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[31]  Chris Callison-Burch,et al.  Creating Speech and Language Data With Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Mturk@HLT-NAACL.

[32]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009). , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Saccadic gain modification: visual error drives motor adaptation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Structural priming as implicit learning: Cumulative priming effects and individual differences , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  Ting Qian,et al.  Syntactic Adaptation in Language Comprehension , 2010, CMCL@ACL.

[39]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[40]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[41]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[43]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[45]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Explorer A Computational Cognitive Model of Syntactic Priming , 2017 .

[47]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[48]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays : Evidence from written and spoken dialogue , 2008 .

[49]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[50]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[51]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Implicit Context-Specific Learning Leads to Rapid Shifts in Syntactic Expectations , 2011, CogSci.

[52]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[53]  Ting Qian,et al.  Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, PloS one.

[54]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production , 2003, Cognition.

[56]  A. Samuel,et al.  Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  This construction needs learned. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.

[59]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[60]  D. Plaut,et al.  Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. , 2004, Psychological review.

[61]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .

[62]  D. Barr Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .