Comparison of Propofol with Methohexital for Outpatient Anesthesia

Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic currently available for clinical investigative use. The intraoperative and postoperative effects of propofol were compared to methohexital when used as an adjuvant to nitrous oxide for outpatient anesthesia. Sixty healthy young women were randomly assigned to receive either methohexital, 1.5 mg/kg intravenously (IV), or propofol, 2.5 mg/kg IV, for induction of anesthesia. Both drugs produced transient cardiovascular and respiratory depression after induction. Maintenance of anesthesia consisted of either methohexital, 6 ± 2 mg/min, or propofol, 7 ± 2 mg/min (mean ± SD) by continuous infusion in combination with nitrous oxide, 70% in oxygen. Use of a propofol infusion was associated with lower blood pressures and heart rates during maintenance. Propofol was associated with fewer side effects (e.g., hiccoughing, nausea, and vomiting) intra- and postoperatively. Recovery times for awakening, orientation, and ambulation were consistently shorter with propofol. We conclude that propofol is a useful alternative to methohexital for induction and maintenance of outpatient anesthesia.

[1]  L. Versichelen,et al.  Effect of speed of injection on induction of anaesthesia using propofol. , 1985, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  F. Carli,et al.  The haemodynamic effects of intravenous induction , 1985, Anaesthesia.

[3]  I. Grant,et al.  Comparison of the new emulsion formulation of propofol with methohexitone and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in day cases. , 1985, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  N. Goodman,et al.  Haemodynamic effects of infusions of diisopropyl phenol (ICI 35 868) during nitrous oxide anaesthesia in man. , 1983, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  J. Dundee,et al.  Effect of preanaesthetic medication on anaesthesia with ICI 35, 868. , 1982, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  P. M. de Grood,et al.  Pharmacology of an emulsion formulation of ICI 35868. , 1985, British Journal of Anaesthesia.

[7]  J. Dundee,et al.  Comparison of the effect of diisopropyl phenol (ICI 35, 868) and thiopentone on response to somatic pain. , 1982, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  J. Sutton,et al.  ADVERSE REACTIONS TO INTRAVENOUS ANAESTHETICS: A Survey of 100 Reports , 1975 .

[9]  J. Wells Comparison of ICI 35868, etomidate and methohexitone for day-case anaesthesia. , 1985, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  R. Fragen,et al.  Effects of premedication on diprivan induction. , 1982, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  J. van Egmond,et al.  Some effects of diisopropyl phenol (ICI 35 868) on the pharmacodynamics of atracurium and vecuronium in anaesthetized man. , 1983, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  G C Cummings,et al.  Dose requirements of ICI 35,868 (Propofol, ‘Diprivan’) in a new formulation for induction of anaesthesia , 1983, Anaesthesia.

[13]  P. White,et al.  EFFECT OF NARCOTIC PREMEDICATION ON THE INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC REQUIREMENT , 1984 .

[14]  M. Wood,et al.  A COMPARISON OF DIPRIVAN AND THIOPENTAL FOR THE INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA , 1985 .

[15]  J. Sear,et al.  Hemodynamic and Hepatic Effects of Methohexital Infusion during Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia in Humans , 1983, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  T. M. Savege,et al.  A study of three doses of ici 35 868 for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. , 1981, British journal of anaesthesia.