Effective dose analysis of three-dimensional rotational angiography during catheter ablation procedures

There is increasing use of three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) during cardiac ablation procedures. As compared with 2D angiography, a large series of images are acquired, creating the potential for high radiation doses. The aim of the present study was to quantify patient-specific effective doses. In this study, we developed a computer model to accurately calculate organ doses and the effective dose incurred during 3DRA image acquisition. The computer model simulates the exposure geometry and uses the actual exposure parameters, including the variation in tube voltage and current that is realized through the automatic exposure control (AEC). We performed 3DRA dose calculations in 42 patients referred for ablation on the Siemens Axiom Artis DynaCT system (Erlangen, Germany). Organ doses and effective dose were calculated separately for all projections in the course of the C-arm rotation. The influence of patient body mass index (BMI), dose-area product (DAP), collimation and dose per frame (DPF) rate setting on the calculated doses was also analysed. The effective dose was found to be 5.5 +/- 1.4 mSv according to ICRP 60 and 6.6 +/- 1.8 mSv according to ICRP 103. Effective dose showed an inversely proportional relationship to BMI, while DAP was nearly BMI independent. No simple conversion coefficient between DAP and effective dose could be derived. DPF reduction did not result in a proportional effective dose decrease. These paradoxical findings were explained by the settings of the AEC and the limitations of the x-ray tube. Collimation reduced the effective dose by more than 20%. Three-dimensional rotational angiography is associated with a definite but acceptable radiation dose that can be calculated for all patients separately. Their BMI is a predictor of the effective dose. The dose reduction achieved with collimation suggests that its use is imperative during the 3DRA procedure.

[1]  M. Tapiovaara,et al.  PCXMC. A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations , 1997 .

[2]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  Initial Experience in the Use of Integrated Electroanatomic Mapping with Three‐Dimensional MR/CT Images to Guide Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  M. Tapiovaara,et al.  Organ Dose Calculation in Medical X Ray Examinations by the Program PCXMC , 1998 .

[4]  F. Maes,et al.  Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole or rapid ventricular pacing to enhance three-dimensional rotational imaging during cardiac ablation procedures. , 2009, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  D J Brenner,et al.  Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[7]  C J Martin,et al.  Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  D. Krum,et al.  Computed Tomography‐Fluoroscopy Image Integration‐Guided Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  K. F. Eckerman,et al.  Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources: 6, Newborn , 1987 .

[10]  C H McCollough,et al.  Calculation of effective dose. , 2000, Medical physics.

[11]  J. Harrison,et al.  Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Comments on a paper by D J Brenner (Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3). , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  J N Kroon,et al.  3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A Workman,et al.  Patient dose from 3D rotational neurovascular studies. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  J. Ector,et al.  Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  I. Seimenis,et al.  Reduction of the estimated radiation dose and associated patient risk with prospective ECG-gated 256-slice CT coronary angiography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[18]  W. Hoffmann,et al.  Geschlechtsspezifische Bestimmung der effektiven Dosis am Beispiel von CT-Thoraxuntersuchungen , 2003 .