Diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T unenhanced whole-heart coronary MR angiography performed with 32-channel cardiac coils: initial single-center experience.

PURPOSE To compare the imaging time and image quality obtained with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed with five- and 32-channel coils in healthy subjects and determine the accuracy of MR angiography performed with 32-channel coils in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and all participants provided written informed consent. The authors studied 10 healthy subjects and 67 patients suspected of having CAD who were scheduled for coronary angiography. Unenhanced 1.5-T coronary MR angiography was performed with five- and 32-channel coils in healthy subjects and with 32-channel coils in patients. Clinically significant CAD was defined as a diameter reduction of at least 50% at coronary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of coronary MR angiography were calculated. RESULTS The mean imaging time was substantially reduced from 12.3 minutes ± 4.2 (standard deviation) with five-channel coils to 6.3 minutes ± 2.2 with 32-channel coils, with equivalent image quality scores. Acquisition of MR angiograms was completed in all 67 patients, with a mean imaging time of 6.2 minutes ± 2.8. The prevalence of CAD in the study population was 58% (39 of the 67 patients). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves as determined at vessel- and patient-based analyses were 0.91 and 0.90, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity at vessel-based analysis were 86% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION Whole-heart coronary MR angiography performed at 1.5 T with 32-channel coils permits noninvasive detection of CAD with substantially reduced imaging time. This noninvasive approach can be an alternative to multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography for ruling out obstructive CAD in patients who have a contraindication to contrast material and in young subjects who are at higher risk from ionizing radiation. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101323/-/DC1.

[1]  Kay Nehrke,et al.  Rapid and complete coronary arterial tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. , 2005, European heart journal.

[2]  M. Van Cauteren,et al.  Assessment of coronary arteries with total study time of less than 30 minutes by using whole-heart coronary MR angiography. , 2005, Radiology.

[3]  Kan Takeda,et al.  Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac CINE MR imaging with a 32‐channel cardiac coil and parallel imaging: Impact of acceleration factors on image quality and volumetric accuracy , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Debiao Li,et al.  Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T: initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Free-breathing 3D steady-state free precession coronary MR angiography with radial k-space sampling: comparison with cartesian k-space sampling and cartesian gradient-echo coronary MR angiography--pilot study. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  M. Stuber,et al.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses , 2002 .

[10]  C. Higgins,et al.  Coronary artery stenoses: assessment with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions. , 1998, Radiology.

[11]  Debiao Li,et al.  Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0-T: a comparative study with X-ray angiography in a single center. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Alastair J. Martin,et al.  Whole‐heart steady‐state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Peter Börnert,et al.  Free‐breathing whole‐heart coronary MR angiography on a clinical scanner in four minutes , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.