Does attraction to conspecifics explain the patch-size effect? An experimental test

Recent theory suggests that attraction to conspecifics during habitat selection can be one potential, yet untested, mechanism for animal sensitivity to habitat fragmentation. The least flycatcher Empidonax minimus, a highly territorial migratory bird, has previously been shown to be attracted to conspecifics and sensitive to patch size by avoiding small patches of riparian forest in Montana, USA. I used a large-scale field experiment in this region to test the conspecific attraction hypothesis for explaining sensitivity to patch size, and I supplemented this experiment by estimating whether vegetation structure, nest predation, or nest parasitism rates could better explain patterns of sensitivity to patch size. Vegetation structure did not vary consistently with patch size, based on a random sample of patches across 150 km of the Madison and Missouri Rivers, Montana. Nest predation and parasitism rates by brown-headed cowbirds Molothrus ater also did not vary with patch size during the experiment. However, when conspecific cues were simulated across a gradient of patch sizes, flycatchers settled in all patches and their sensitivity to patch size vanished providing strong support for the conspecific attraction hypothesis. These results provide the first experimental evidence that attraction to conspecifics can indeed help explain area sensitivity in nature and highlight how understanding the role of animal behavior in heterogeneous landscapes can aid in interpreting pressing conservation issues.

[1]  J. Verner Data needs for avian conservation biology : have we avoided critical research? , 1992 .

[2]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communites? , 1990, Oecologia.

[3]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Demographic Responses by Birds to Forest Fragmentation , 2005 .

[4]  Therese M. Donovan,et al.  Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds , 1995, Science.

[5]  Robert J. Fletcher,et al.  Partitioning the multi-scale effects of human activity on the occurrence of riparian forest birds , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[7]  S. Risch INSECT HERBIVORE ABUNDANCE IN TROPICAL MONOCULTURES AND POLYCULTURES: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF TWO HYPOTHESES' , 1981 .

[8]  Kimberly Maute,et al.  HETEROSPECIFIC FACILITATION OF FOREST-BOUNDARY CROSSING BY MOBBING UNDERSTORY BIRDS IN NORTH-CENTRAL FLORIDA , 2004 .

[9]  A. Chalfoun,et al.  Assessments of habitat preferences and quality depend on spatial scale and metrics of fitness , 2007 .

[10]  F. Thompson,et al.  Making meaningful estimates of nest survival with model-based methods , 2007 .

[11]  T. E. Martin ARE MICROHABITAT PREFERENCES OF COEXISTING SPECIES UNDER SELECTION AND ADAPTIVE , 1998 .

[12]  D. E. Andersen,et al.  ADVANTAGES OF CLUSTERED NESTING FOR LEAST FLYCATCHERS IN NORTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA , 2003 .

[13]  S. Schlossberg,et al.  Conspecific Attraction and the Conservation of Territorial Songbirds , 2004 .

[14]  J. Lawton Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[15]  Leslie Ries,et al.  The role of habitat area and edge in fragmented landscapes : definitively distinct or inevitably intertwined ? 1 , 2007 .

[16]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  E. Silverman,et al.  Social cues facilitate habitat selection: American redstarts establish breeding territories in response to song , 2006, Biology Letters.

[18]  L. Fahrig,et al.  HABITAT LOSS AND POPULATION DECLINE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PATCH SIZE EFFECT , 1998 .

[19]  R. J. Robertson,et al.  Response of American redstarts (suborder Passeri) and least flycatchers (suborder Tyranni) to heterospecific playback: the role of song in aggressive interactions and interference competition , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[21]  Robert J Fletcher,et al.  Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. , 2006, The American naturalist.

[22]  M. Murakami,et al.  Stream meanders increase insectivorous bird abundance in riparian deciduous forests , 2003 .

[23]  S. A. Temple,et al.  Area-Dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin Forests , 1983 .

[24]  P. Boag,et al.  Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks , 2005 .

[25]  T. Parker,et al.  Edge and Area Effects on the Occurrence of Migrant Forest Songbirds , 2005 .

[26]  W. Link,et al.  The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis , 1997 .

[27]  D. E. Andersen,et al.  Reduced Predation at Interior Nests in Clustered All-Purpose Territories of Least Flycatchers (Empidonax Minimus) , 2008 .

[28]  T. E. Martin Nest Predation Among Vegetation Layers and Habitat Types: Revising the Dogmas , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[29]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  Are Fragments Islands? Landscape Context and Density‐Area Relationships in Boreal Forest Birds , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Scott E. Stephens,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales , 2004 .

[31]  R. R. Johnson,et al.  CONSERVATION OF RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS IN THE , 1988 .

[32]  T. Smith,et al.  Territory size variation in the ovenbird: the role of habitat structure. [Seiurus aurocapillus] , 1987 .

[33]  Adam S Hadley,et al.  Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  E. Nol,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FOOD ABUNDANCE, NEST-SITE HABITAT, AND FOREST FRAGMENTATION ON BREEDING OVENBIRDS , 1998 .

[35]  J. Stamps Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[36]  R. Fletcher Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[37]  James M. Yoder,et al.  INDIVIDUALS–AREA RELATIONSHIPS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANIMAL POPULATION DENSITY AND AREA , 2000 .

[38]  J. Karr,et al.  Breeding Birds of Isolated Woodlots: Area and Habitat Relationships. , 1987, Ecology.

[39]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  BREEDING PRODUCTIVITY DOES NOT DECLINE WITH INCREASING FRAGMENTATION IN A WESTERN LANDSCAPE , 1998 .

[40]  R. B. Root Organization of a Plant-Arthropod Association in Simple and Diverse Habitats: The Fauna of Collards (Brassica Oleracea) , 1973 .

[41]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions , 2008 .

[42]  R. R. Johnson,et al.  Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States , 1988 .

[43]  K. Hobson,et al.  Stable Isotope Analysis Reveals That Agricultural Habitat Provides an Important Dietary Component for Nonbreeding Dunlin , 2005 .

[44]  T. Donovan,et al.  AREA-SENSITIVE DISTRIBUTIONS COUNTERACT NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON BREEDING BIRDS , 2001 .

[45]  C. Whelan,et al.  The Relative Impacts of Nest Predation and Brood Parasitism on Seasonal Fecundity in Songbirds , 1999 .

[46]  A. Desrochers,et al.  Spatial Aggregation of Forest Songbird Territories and Possible Implications for Area Sensitivity , 2006 .

[47]  R. Fletcher Social information and community dynamics: nontarget effects from simulating social cues for management. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  On the evolution of hidden leks and the implications for reproductive and habitat selection behaviours , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  A. Dobson,et al.  Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: Conspecific attraction and recruitment. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .