Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of seven contemporary food waste management systems.

Municipal food waste (FW) represents 35-45% of household residual waste in Australia, with the nation generating 1.6Tg annually. It is estimated that 91% of this FW ends up in landfill. This study used life cycle assessment to determine and compare the environmental impact of seven contemporary FW management systems for two real-life jurisdictions; incorporating the complete waste service and expanding the system to include inert and garden waste. Although, no system exhibited a best ranking across all impact categories, FW digestion based systems were all revealed to have a lower global warming potential than composting and landfilling systems. Mechanical biological treatment, anaerobic co-digestion, and home composting all demonstrated the lowest environmental impacts for two or more of the environmental impact categories assessed. The assessment included market and technological specific variables and uncertainties providing a framework for robust decision making at a municipality level.

[1]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Biomethane potential evaluation of co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes , 2016 .

[2]  G. Zupančič,et al.  Full-scale anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste and municipal sludge. , 2008 .

[3]  Pascale Champagne,et al.  Effects of ultrasonic and thermo-chemical pre-treatments on methane production from fat, oil and grease (FOG) and synthetic kitchen waste (KW) in anaerobic co-digestion. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Annop Nopharatana,et al.  Kinetics and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. , 2007, Waste management.

[5]  Jingxing Ma,et al.  Enhanced biomethanation of kitchen waste by different pre-treatments. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[6]  Y. Fernández-Nava,et al.  Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Asturias (Spain) , 2014 .

[7]  M. A. Renouf,et al.  Best Practice Guide for Mid‐Point Life Cycle Impact Assessment in Australia -Version 2 , 2016 .

[8]  Davide Tonini,et al.  Mechanical-biological treatment: performance and potentials. An LCA of 8 MBT plants including waste characterization. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Min Ji,et al.  Hydrogen and methane production by co-digestion of waste activated sludge and food waste in the two-stage fermentation process: substrate conversion and energy yield. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[10]  D Bolzonella,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of waste activated sludge and OFMSW: the experiences of viareggio and treviso plants (Italy). , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  M. Kim,et al.  Characterization of typical household food wastes from disposers: fractionation of constituents and implications for resource recovery at wastewater treatment. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Stewart Burn,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal food waste and sewage sludge: A comparative life cycle assessment in the context of a waste service provision. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[13]  A. Noyola,et al.  Two-phase (acidogenic-methanogenic) anaerobic thermophilic/mesophilic digestion system for producing Class A biosolids from municipal sludge. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Sergi Astals,et al.  A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013 , 2014 .

[15]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[16]  Dominique Guyonnet,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. , 2012, Waste management.

[17]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives. , 2014, Waste management.

[18]  Stephanie Lansing,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a food waste composting system: environmental impact hotspots , 2013 .

[19]  Paolo Pavan,et al.  Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and source sorted biowaste in pilot- and full-scale reactors. , 2013 .

[20]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[21]  Adriana Artola,et al.  Determination of the energy and environmental burdens associated with the biological treatment of source-separated Municipal Solid Wastes , 2012 .

[22]  Darren Perrin,et al.  Issues associated with transforming household attitudes and opinions into materials recovery: a review of two kerbside recycling schemes , 2001 .

[23]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[24]  T. Tan,et al.  Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production , 2014 .

[25]  Ivan Muñoz,et al.  Methane oxidation, biogenic carbon, and the IPCC’s emission metrics. Proposal for a consistent greenhouse-gas accounting , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  A. Bernstad,et al.  Separate collection of household food waste for anaerobic degradation - Comparison of different techniques from a systems perspective. , 2012, Waste management.

[27]  F. Fantozzi,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of organic waste management strategies: an Italian case study , 2015 .

[28]  K. Moriarty,et al.  Feasibility Study of Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste in St. Bernard, Louisiana. A Study Prepared in Partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America's Land Initiative: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites , 2013 .

[29]  Hang-sik Shin,et al.  A comparison study on the high-rate co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste using a temperature-phased anaerobic sequencing batch reactor system. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[30]  Zhixin Yu,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant , 2015 .

[31]  Víctor Riau,et al.  Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) to obtain class A biosolids: a semi-continuous study. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[32]  Veronica Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Material resources, energy, and nutrient recovery from waste: are waste refineries the solution for the future? , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Víctor Riau,et al.  Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) to obtain Class A biosolids. A discontinuous study. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[34]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: methodological guidance for a better practice. , 2014, Waste management.

[35]  S. Heaven,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: performance assessment by mass and energy balance. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[36]  Tim Patterson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[37]  J la Cour Jansen,et al.  Need for improvements in physical pretreatment of source-separated household food waste. , 2013, Waste management.

[38]  C. Montejo,et al.  Analysis of the presence of improper materials in the composting process performed in ten MBT plants. , 2010, Bioresource technology.