Landscape-level comparison of genetic diversity and differentiation in a small mammal inhabiting different fragmented landscapes of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Habitat loss and fragmentation can have detrimental effects on all levels of biodiversity, including genetic variation. Most studies that investigate genetic effects of habitat loss and fragmentation focus on analysing genetic data from a single landscape. However, our understanding of habitat loss effects on landscape-wide patterns of biodiversity would benefit from studies that are based on quantitative comparisons among multiple study landscapes. Here, we use such a landscape-level study design to compare genetic variation in the forest-specialist marsupial Marmosops incanus from four 10,000-hectare Atlantic forest landscapes which differ in the amount of their remaining native forest cover (86, 49, 31, 11 %). Additionally, we used a model selection framework to evaluate the influence of patch characteristics on genetic variation within each landscape. We genotyped 529 individuals with 12 microsatellites to statistically compare estimates of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation in populations inhabiting different forest patches within the landscapes. Our study indicates that before the extinction of the specialist species (here in the 11 % landscape) genetic diversity is significantly reduced in the 31 % landscape, while genetic differentiation is significantly higher in the 49 and 31 % landscapes compared to the 86 % landscape. Results further provide evidence for non-proportional responses of genetic diversity and differentiation to increasing habitat loss, and suggest that local patch isolation impacts gene flow and genetic connectivity only in the 31 % landscape. These results have high relevance for analysing landscape genetic relationships and emphasize the importance of landscape-level study designs for understanding habitat loss effects on all levels of biodiversity.

[1]  V. Wolters,et al.  Differential threshold effects of habitat fragmentation on gene flow in two widespread species of bush crickets , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[2]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[3]  R. DeSalle,et al.  PERMANENT GENETIC RESOURCES: Characterization of eight microsatellite loci in the woolly mouse opossum, Micoureus paraguayanus, isolated from Micoureus demerarae , 2008, Molecular ecology resources.

[4]  A. King,et al.  Extinction Thresholds for Species in Fractal Landscapes , 1999 .

[5]  M. D. Samuel,et al.  The walk is never random: subtle landscape effects shape gene flow in a continuous white‐tailed deer population in the Midwestern United States , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[6]  L. Jost.  GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[7]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics , 2006 .

[8]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data , 2007 .

[9]  H. Akaike.  INFORMATION THEORY AS AN EXTENSION OF THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD , 1973 .

[10]  M. Nei,et al.  Genetic variation in subdivided populations and conservation genetics , 1986, Heredity.

[11]  S. Sommer,et al.  Immigration Rates in Fragmented Landscapes – Empirical Evidence for the Importance of Habitat Amount for Species Persistence , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  S. Westenberger,et al.  Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers in the gray, short‐tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) , 2005 .

[13]  L. Fahrig.  Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[14]  S. Hannon,et al.  Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: a review of the concepts, evidence, and applications , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[15]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[16]  K. V. Subbarao,et al.  Permanent Genetic Resources added to Molecular Ecology Resources Database 1 May 2009–31 July 2009 , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[17]  I. Hanski.  Habitat Loss, the Dynamics of Biodiversity, and a Perspective on Conservation , 2011, AMBIO.

[18]  R. Hobbs,et al.  A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[19]  L. Fahrig,et al.  How should we measure landscape connectivity? , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[21]  A. King,et al.  Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  Morgan McGuire,et al.  A meta‐analysis of isolation by distance: relic or reference standard for landscape genetics? , 2010 .

[23]  J. Metzger,et al.  Beyond the Fragmentation Threshold Hypothesis: Regime Shifts in Biodiversity Across Fragmented Landscapes , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[25]  H. Siegismund,et al.  Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation GST, DEST and G’ST: how wrong have we been? , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[26]  Nicholas G. Crawford,et al.  smogd: software for the measurement of genetic diversity , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[27]  W. F. Porter,et al.  Thresholds in the long-term responses of breeding birds to forest cover and fragmentation , 2010 .

[28]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds , 2005 .

[29]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[30]  N. Mantel.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[31]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  R. Frankham.  Genetics and extinction , 2005 .

[33]  M. Nei,et al.  Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. , 1978, Genetics.

[34]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[35]  P. Hedrick.  A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  S. Matter,et al.  Among- and within-patch components of genetic diversity respond at different rates to habitat fragmentation: an empirical demonstration , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  C. Oosterhout,et al.  Micro-Checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data , 2004 .

[38]  George R. Parker,et al.  Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design , 1994 .

[39]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[40]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology , 2001 .

[41]  C. Schlötterer,et al.  microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets , 2003 .

[42]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. A reply , 2001 .

[43]  Alan R. Templeton,et al.  Population Genetics and Microevolutionary Theory , 2006 .

[44]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[45]  S. Kalinowski.  hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness , 2005 .

[46]  G. Gerlach,et al.  Calculations of population differentiation based on GST and D: forget GST but not all of statistics! , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[47]  S. Scheu,et al.  Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[48]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[49]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  EFFECT OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ON THE EXTINCTION THRESHOLD: A SYNTHESIS* , 2002 .

[51]  I. Hanski.  A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[52]  F. Davis,et al.  Conserving the evolutionary potential of California valley oak (Quercus lobata Née): a multivariate genetic approach to conservation planning , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[53]  F. Burel,et al.  Connectivity measures: a review , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[54]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Assessing population structure: FST and related measures , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[55]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .