Comparing the Effectiveness of Intensive and Traditional Courses

The present study investigated differences in the effectiveness of instructors from a variety of departments who taught the same course in both intensive and traditional formats within the same year, while controlling for many confounding variables. Results indicated that intensive courses did not significantly differ from traditional courses in overall instructor ratings on student evaluations of teaching effectiveness when confounding variables were taken into account. Conversely, intensive courses received significantly higher overall course ratings on student evaluations than did traditional courses, even after controlling for class size and probable grade in course. These findings provide further evidence that negative beliefs concerning intensive courses may be unjustified, and intensive courses may be as or more effective than those presented in traditional formats.

[1]  Patricia A. Scott,et al.  A Critique of Intensive Courses and an Agenda for Research. , 1991 .

[2]  Peter A. Cohen,et al.  Bringing research into practice , 1990 .

[3]  E. Daniel,et al.  A Review of Time-Shortened Courses across Disciplines , 2000 .

[4]  Kenneth A. Feldman,et al.  The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies , 1989 .

[5]  A. Greenwald.  Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[6]  P. Abrami,et al.  Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research , 1987 .

[7]  Alenoush Saroyan,et al.  Evaluating University Teaching: Time to take stock , 2001 .

[8]  Marc Seamon,et al.  Short-and Long-Term Differences in Instructional Effectiveness Between Intensive and Semester-Length Courses. , 2004 .

[9]  H. Marsh.  Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[10]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness : a test of alternative higher-order structures , 1991 .

[11]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  Ratings of university teacher instruction: how much do student and course characteristics really matter? , 2005 .

[12]  Patricia A. Scott,et al.  Attributes of high‐quality intensive courses , 2003 .

[13]  D. Moriarty,et al.  A Survey of January Interim Psychology Courses , 1982 .

[14]  K. Feldman.  Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings 1 , 2007 .

[15]  P. A. Cohen.  Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies , 1981 .

[16]  Mark A. Kretovics,et al.  A Study of Faculty Perceptions of Summer Compressed Course Teaching , 2005 .

[17]  K. Feldman.  Identifying exemplary teaching: Using data from course and teacher evaluations , 1996 .

[18]  Raymond J. Wlodkowski.  Accelerated learning in colleges and universities , 2003 .

[19]  H. Marsh.  Students ' Evaluations of University Teaching : Dimensionality , Reliability , Validity , Potential Biases , and Utility , 2005 .

[20]  W. Martin Davies,et al.  Intensive Teaching Formats: A Review. , 2006 .