Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with a regulation macro script – an exploratory study

This study examines student teachers’ collaborative learning by focusing on socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring processes during more and less active script discussions as well as the near transfer of monitoring activities in the subsequent task work. The participants of this study were teacher education students whose collaborative learning was supported with a designed regulation macro script during a six weeks environmental science course. The script divided the group work into three phases, namely: the orientation phase, intermediate phase, and reflection phase. The script was put in use by prompting questions that were delivered to the students on tablets. Question prompts instructed groups to plan their collaborative processes, and to stop and reflect on the efficiency of their strategies and outcomes of their learning process. The data were collected by videotaping the groups’ face-to-face work and analysed by focusing on verbalised monitoring interactions. More active and less active script discussions were differentiated in terms of the length and the quality of discussion. The results show that the macro script was used more thoroughly at the beginning of the group activities for orientation than for coordinating the progress or reflecting on the performance. Active script discussions involved more monitoring activities, especially providing socio-emotional support. Once socio-emotional support was stimulated in the more active script discussion, it tended to follow-up during the task work. It can be concluded, that the groups appropriated the script differently in different situations and with varied success. The implications of facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning are discussed.

[1]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[2]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Metacognitive Experience and Transfer of Logical Reasoning , 1983 .

[3]  B. Zimmerman A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[4]  R. Lazarus Cognition and motivation in emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[5]  A. King Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning , 1992 .

[6]  Michael Shayer,et al.  An Exploration of Long-Term Far-Transfer Effects Following an Extended Intervention Program in the High School Science Curriculum , 1993 .

[7]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[8]  G. Dobbins,et al.  Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis , 1997 .

[9]  Stephanie D. Teasley Talking about reasoning : How important is the peer in peer collaboration? , 1997 .

[10]  M. Chi Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[11]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning : from teaching to self-reflective practice , 1998 .

[12]  D. Halpern Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[13]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[14]  Petros Georghiades,et al.  Beyond conceptual change learning in science education: focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition , 2000 .

[15]  Paul A. Schutz,et al.  Emotions and Self-Regulation During Test Taking , 2000 .

[16]  M. Goos,et al.  Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving , 2002 .

[17]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[18]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[19]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Elaborating New Arguments Through a CSCL Script , 2003 .

[20]  C. Wolters,et al.  Regulation of Motivation: Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning , 2003 .

[21]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study , 2003, Cognition & emotion.

[22]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[24]  D. Branson,et al.  Assessing critical thinking and problem solving using a Web-based curriculum for students , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  Susan M. Land,et al.  A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions , 2004 .

[26]  F. Fischer,et al.  Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning , 2005 .

[27]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[28]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Metacognition in joint discussions: an analysis of the patterns of interaction and the metacognitive content of the networked discussions in mathematics , 2006 .

[29]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments , 2006 .

[30]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[31]  S. Volet,et al.  Group work at university: significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals , 2006 .

[32]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[33]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[35]  F. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment , 2007 .

[36]  A. King Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective , 2007 .

[37]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[38]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  How Pictorial Knowledge Representations Mediate Collaborative Knowledge Construction In Groups , 2008 .

[39]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions , 2008 .

[40]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[41]  M. Osman Positive transfer and negative transfer/antilearning of problem-solving skills. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[43]  N. Webb,et al.  ‘Explain to your partner’: teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups , 2009 .

[44]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Instructional designs for the development of transferable knowledge and skills: A cognitive load perspective , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[46]  Cinnamon Hillyard,et al.  University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation , 2010 .

[47]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Research on Motivation in Collaborative Learning: Moving Beyond the Cognitive–Situative Divide and Combining Individual and Social Processes , 2010 .

[48]  S. Volet,et al.  Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: evidence from observations and self-reports , 2010 .

[49]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Teachers' Instructional Planning for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Macro-Scripts as a Pedagogical Method to Facilitate Collaborative Learning. , 2010 .

[50]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Self-Regulated, Co-Regulated, and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning , 2011 .

[51]  Monique Boekaerts What Have We Learned About the Social Context–Student Engagement Link? , 2011 .

[52]  Toni Kempler Rogat,et al.  Affect and engagement during small group instruction , 2011 .

[53]  M. Vauras,et al.  Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes , 2011 .

[54]  Toni Kempler Rogat,et al.  Socially Shared Regulation in Collaborative Groups: An Analysis of the Interplay Between Quality of Social Regulation and Group Processes , 2011 .

[55]  J. Janssen,et al.  Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning , 2012 .

[56]  Nadira Saab Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL , 2012, Metacognition and Learning.

[57]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  A Cyclical Self-Regulatory Account of Student Engagement: Theoretical Foundations and Applications , 2012 .

[58]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  INTRODUCTION: Visions of learning together , 2013 .

[59]  Toni Kempler Rogat and Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia Understanding Quality Variation in Socially Shared Regulation: A Focus on Methodology , 2013 .

[60]  M. Baker,et al.  Paper and computers: gender differences in children's conversations in collaborative activities , 2013 .

[61]  N. DiDonato Effective self- and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks , 2013 .

[62]  S. Järvelä,et al.  New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCL , 2013 .

[63]  F. Fischer,et al.  Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[64]  M. Hannafin,et al.  A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[65]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Analyzing Regulation of Motivation as an Individual and Social Process: A Situated Approach , 2013 .

[66]  Hans Spada,et al.  Motivation and emotion in shaping knowledge co-construction , 2013 .

[67]  Toni Kempler Rogat,et al.  Other-regulation in collaborative groups: implications for regulation quality , 2014 .

[68]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Emotion Regulation in Education: Conceptual Foundations, Current Applications, and Future Directions , 2014 .

[69]  S. Volet,et al.  Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding? , 2014 .

[70]  Kyungbin Kwon,et al.  Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[71]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—A process-oriented case study in a higher education context , 2014 .

[72]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Exploration of the cognitive regulatory sub-processes employed by groups characterized by socially shared and other-regulation in a CSCL context , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[73]  M. Miller,et al.  Leveraging CSCL technology to support and research shared task perceptions in socially shared regulation of learning , 2015 .

[74]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Understanding Regulated Learning in Situative and Contextual Frameworks , 2015 .

[75]  Mary E. Webb,et al.  Social Regulation of Learning During Collaborative Inquiry Learning in Science: How does it emerge and what are its functions? , 2015 .

[76]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment , 2015, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[77]  Mariel Miller,et al.  Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[78]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools , 2014, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[79]  Toni Kempler Rogat,et al.  Interrelation between regulatory and socioemotional processes within collaborative groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[80]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  The role of regulation in medical student learning in small groups: Regulating oneself and others' learning and emotions , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[81]  M. Valcke,et al.  Socially shared metacognitive regulation during reciprocal peer tutoring: identifying its relationship with students’ content processing and transactive discussions , 2014, Instructional Science.

[82]  D. Lombardi,et al.  Coding Classroom Interactions for Collective and Individual Engagement , 2015 .

[83]  Jonna Malmberg,et al.  How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? , 2016 .

[84]  Kristine Lund,et al.  Group emotions: the social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation , 2016, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[85]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Contribution to a theory of CSCL scripts: taking into account the appropriation of scripts by learners , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[86]  Sten R. Ludvigsen CSCL: connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[87]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Appropriation from a script theory of guidance perspective: a response to Pierre Tchounikine , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[88]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[89]  Jonna Malmberg,et al.  Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning , 2017 .

[90]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Monitoring makes a difference: quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning , 2017 .

[91]  F. Fischer,et al.  Socio-Cognitive Scaffolding with Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts: a Meta-Analysis , 2017 .

[92]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading , 2018 .