Special issue on the use of computer algebra systems for computer aided control system design

The importance of the continuing and growing need in the systems and control community for reliable algorithms and robust numerical software for increasingly challenging applications is well known and has already been reported elsewhere (IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Vol. 24, Issue 1). However, we have all had the experience of working on a mathematical project where an increased number of symbolic manipulations was needed. In a simple case, the required computation might have been to compute the Laplace transform or the inverse Laplace transform of a function, or to find the transfer function matrix for a given system topology where parameters are included. In a more demanding situation the required computation might have been to find the parametric family of solutions of a polynomial matrix Diophantine equation resulting from a variety of control problems such as those associated with stabilization, decoupling, model matching, tracking and regulation, or to compute the Smith McMillan form of a rational transfer function matrix in order to obtain a better insight into a number of structural properties of a system. The desire to use a computer to perform long and tedious mathematical computations such as the above led to the establishment of a new area of research whose main objective is the development: (a) of systems (software and hardware) for symbolic mathematical computations, and (b) of efficient symbolic algorithms for the solution of mathematically formulated problems. This new subject area is referred to by a variety of terms such as symbolic computations, computer algebra, algebraic algorithms to name a few. During the last four decades this subject area has accomplished important steps and it is still continuing its evolution process.

[1]  Shinji Hara,et al.  A parameter space approach to fixed-order robust controller synthesis by quantifier elimination , 2006 .

[2]  Ilker Ustoglu,et al.  Designing control systems using exact and symbolic manipulations of formulae , 2006 .

[3]  Marilena Mitrouli,et al.  Matrix pencil methodologies for computing the greatest common divisor of polynomials: hybrid algorithms and their performance , 2006 .

[4]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Symbolic sensitivity analysis of IIR digital filters using MATLAB , 2006 .

[5]  Andreas Varga,et al.  Symbolic manipulation techniques for low order LFT-based parametric uncertainty modelling , 2006 .

[6]  Miroslav D. Lutovac,et al.  Symbolic analysis and design of control systems using Mathematica , 2006 .

[7]  Massimo Caboara,et al.  Efficient algorithms for geometric control of systems over rings , 2006 .

[8]  J. Liang,et al.  Hybrid symbolic and numerical simulation studies of time-fractional order wave-diffusion systems , 2006 .

[9]  A. C. Zolotas,et al.  Mathematica implementation of output-feedback pole assignment for uncertain systems via symbolic algebra , 2006 .

[10]  Zongli Lin,et al.  Symbolic realization of asymptotic time-scale and eigenstructure assignment design method in multivariable control , 2006 .

[11]  M. Morari,et al.  Parametric optimization and optimal control using algebraic geometry methods , 2006 .

[12]  Claude-Pierre Jeannerod,et al.  Asymptotically fast polynomial matrix algorithms for multivariable systems , 2005, ArXiv.

[13]  Z. Benyo,et al.  Product review - Control system professional suite , 2005, IEEE Control Systems.

[14]  N.J. Higham,et al.  The sensitivity of computational control problems , 2004, IEEE Control Systems.

[15]  David R. Stoutemyer Computer algebra for the calculus of variations, the maximum principle, and automatic control , 2004, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences.

[16]  M.C. de Oliveira,et al.  Computer algebra tailored to matrix inequalities in control , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[17]  Nicholas P. Karampetakis,et al.  Solution of discrete ARMA-representations via MAPLE , 2003, Appl. Math. Comput..

[18]  Erich Kaltofen,et al.  Computer algebra handbook , 2002 .

[19]  Andreas Kugi,et al.  Control of nonlinear descriptor systems, a computer algebra based approach , 2001 .

[20]  G. Looye,et al.  Symbolic and numerical software tools for LFT-based low order uncertainty modeling , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design (Cat. No.99TH8404).

[21]  Neil Munro,et al.  The Symbolic Methods in Control System Analysis and Design , 1999 .

[22]  N. Munro,et al.  Pole assignment and symbolic algebra: a new way of thinking , 1998 .

[23]  Using Computer Algebra for Solving Some Optimal Control Problems by Dynamic Programming , 1997 .

[24]  A. B. Ogunye SYMCON: Symbolic Computation Controller package for use with MapleV , 1996, Proceedings of Joint Conference on Control Applications Intelligent Control and Computer Aided Control System Design.

[25]  Marie-Françoise Roy,et al.  Computing roadmaps of semi-algebraic sets (extended abstract) , 1996, STOC '96.

[26]  M. Husty An algorithm for solving the direct kinematics of general Stewart-Gough platforms , 1996 .

[27]  P. Gawthrop,et al.  Symbolic algebra and physical-model-based control , 1996 .

[28]  A. B. Ogunye,et al.  State space computations using MapleV , 1996 .

[29]  B. de Jager The use of symbolic computation in nonlinear control: is it viable? , 1993 .

[30]  N. Bose Gröbner Bases: An Algorithmic Method in Polynomial Ideal Theory , 1995 .

[31]  Arjeh M. Cohen,et al.  Applied computer algebra : experience from Cam design , 1995 .

[32]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  A Symbolic Formulation of Dynamic Equations For a Manipulator With Rigid and Flexible Links , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[33]  N. Munro,et al.  Some recent results using symbolic algebra , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Computer-Aided Control Systems Design (CACSD).

[34]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  Nonlinear Control Systems Analysis using Computer Algebra , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[35]  Hemanshu R. Pota,et al.  Multivariable transfer functions for a slewing piezoelectric laminate beam , 1992, [Proceedings 1992] IEEE International Conference on Systems Engineering.

[36]  Sabri Cetinkunt,et al.  Computer Automated Symbolic Modeling of Dynamics of Robotic Manipulators with Flexible Links , 1992, Robotica.

[37]  de Ag Bram Jager,et al.  Analysis and design of nonlinear control systems with the symbolic computation system MAPLE , 1992 .

[38]  Hong Y. Lee,et al.  Displacement analysis of the general spatial 7-link 7R mechanism , 1988 .

[39]  O. Akhrif,et al.  Computer Algebra for Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems , 1987, 1987 American Control Conference.

[40]  B. Buchberger,et al.  Grobner Bases : An Algorithmic Method in Polynomial Ideal Theory , 1985 .

[41]  C. Paige Properties of numerical algorithms related to computing controllability , 1981 .