Interplay between Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Orbital Order in 5-Pocket Model for Iron-Based Superconductors: Parquet Renormalization Group Study.

We report the results of the parquet renormalization group (RG) analysis of the phase diagram of the most general 5-pocket model for Fe-based superconductors. We use as an input the orbital structure of excitations near the five pockets made out of d_{xz}, d_{yz}, and d_{xy} orbitals and argue that there are 40 different interactions between low-energy fermions in the orbital basis. All interactions flow under the RG, as one progressively integrates out fermions with higher energies. We find that the low-energy behavior is amazingly simple, despite the large number of interactions. Namely, at low energies the full 5-pocket model effectively reduces either to a 3-pocket model made of one d_{xy} hole pocket and two electron pockets or a 4-pocket model made of two d_{xz}/d_{yz} hole pockets and two electron pockets. The leading instability in the effective 4-pocket model is a spontaneous orbital (nematic) order, followed by s^{+-} superconductivity. In the effective 3-pocket model, orbital fluctuations are weaker, and the system develops either s^{+-} superconductivity or a stripe spin-density wave. In the latter case, nematicity is induced by composite spin fluctuations.

[1]  E. Alp,et al.  Strong cooperative coupling of pressure-induced magnetic order and nematicity in FeSe , 2016, Nature Communications.

[2]  R. Fernandes,et al.  Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why? , 2016, 1602.05503.

[3]  R. Scalettar,et al.  Superconductivity and nematic fluctuations in a model of doped FeSe monolayers: Determinant quantum Monte Carlo study , 2015, Physical Review B.

[4]  H. Kontani,et al.  Nematicity and Magnetism in FeSe and Other Families of Fe-Based Superconductors , 2015, 1509.01161.

[5]  Y. Gallais,et al.  Charge nematicity and electronic Raman scattering in iron-based superconductors , 2015, 1508.01319.

[6]  P. Dai,et al.  Critical quadrupole fluctuations and collective modes in iron pnictide superconductors , 2014, 1410.6456.

[7]  M. Kuwata-Gonokami,et al.  Momentum-dependent sign inversion of orbital order in superconducting FeSe , 2015, 1504.00980.

[8]  A. Schofield,et al.  Emergence of the nematic electronic state in FeSe , 2015, 1502.02917.

[9]  J. Brink,et al.  Orbital-driven nematicity in FeSe. , 2014, Nature materials.

[10]  Zhentao Wang,et al.  Orbital nematic order and interplay with magnetism in the two-orbital Hubbard model , 2014, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[11]  O. Vafek,et al.  Distinguishing spin-orbit coupling and nematic order in the electronic spectrum of iron-based superconductors , 2014, 1411.4303.

[12]  O. Vafek,et al.  Renormalization group study of interaction-driven quantum anomalous Hall and quantum spin Hall phases in quadratic band crossing systems , 2014, 1403.4957.

[13]  J. Schmalian,et al.  What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? , 2014, Nature Physics.

[14]  G. Kotliar,et al.  Spin dynamics and orbital-antiphase pairing symmetry in iron-based superconductors , 2013, Nature Physics.

[15]  W. Hanke,et al.  Functional renormalization group for multi-orbital Fermi surface instabilities , 2013, 1310.6191.

[16]  E. Dagotto,et al.  Nematic state of pnictides stabilized by interplay between spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[17]  Dung-Hai Lee,et al.  Fermiology, orbital order, orbital fluctuations, and Cooper pairing in iron-based superconductors , 2013, 1305.0605.

[18]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Space group symmetry, spin-orbit coupling, and the low-energy effective Hamiltonian for iron-based superconductors , 2013, 1304.3723.

[19]  R. Zeyher,et al.  Superconductivity from orbital nematic fluctuations , 2013, 1303.3806.

[20]  P. Littlewood,et al.  Nematicity driven by hybridization in iron-based superconductors , 2013, 1302.5739.

[21]  A. Taleb-Ibrahimi,et al.  Impact of the two Fe unit cell on the electronic structure measured by ARPES in iron pnictides , 2012, 1205.4513.

[22]  V. Fal’ko,et al.  Competing nematic, antiferromagnetic, and spin-flux orders in the ground state of bilayer graphene , 2012, 1203.4608.

[23]  P. Phillips,et al.  Non-Fermi Liquid due to Orbital Fluctuations in Iron Pnictide Superconductors , 2011, 1110.5917.

[24]  J. Knolle,et al.  Preemptive nematic order, pseudogap, and orbital order in the iron pnictides , 2011, 1110.1893.

[25]  Rajiv R. P. Singh,et al.  Phase transitions in spin-orbital models with spin-space anisotropies for iron pnictides: Monte Carlo simulations , 2011, 1110.0434.

[26]  W. Hanke,et al.  Competing many-body instabilities and unconventional superconductivity in graphene , 2011, 1109.2953.

[27]  Rahul Nandkishore,et al.  Chiral superconductivity from repulsive interactions in doped graphene , 2011, Nature Physics.

[28]  M. Salmhofer,et al.  Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems , 2011, 1105.5289.

[29]  P. Phillips,et al.  Orbitally and magnetically induced anisotropy in iron-based superconductors , 2011, 1105.4630.

[30]  W. Hanke,et al.  Mechanism for explaining differences in the order parameters of FeAs-based and FeP-based pnictide superconductors. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[31]  S. Maiti,et al.  Renormalization group flow, competing phases, and the structure of superconducting gap in multiband models of iron-based superconductors , 2010, 1010.0984.

[32]  M. J. Calderón,et al.  Conductivity anisotropy in the antiferromagnetic state of iron pnictides. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[33]  H.-P. Cheng,et al.  Sensitivity of the superconducting state and magnetic susceptibility to key aspects of electronic structure in ferropnictides , 2010, 1003.2777.

[34]  P. Canfield,et al.  FeAs-Based Superconductivity: A Case Study of the Effects of Transition Metal Doping on BaFe2As2 , 2010, 1002.0858.

[35]  A. Chubukov,et al.  Magnetic degeneracy and hidden metallicity of the spin-density-wave state in ferropnictides , 2009, 0911.1754.

[36]  Y. B. Kim,et al.  Collective modes and emergent symmetry of superconductivity and magnetism in the iron pnictides , 2009 .

[37]  W. Yin,et al.  Ferro-orbital order and strong magnetic anisotropy in the parent compounds of iron-pnictide superconductors. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[38]  W. Hanke,et al.  Pairing in the iron arsenides: a functional RG treatment , 2009, 0903.1963.

[39]  J. Brink,et al.  Spin-orbital frustrations and anomalous metallic state in iron-pnictide superconductors , 2008, 0811.4104.

[40]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Valley density-wave and multiband superconductivity in iron-based pnictide superconductors , 2008, 0808.3742.

[41]  Karyn Le Hur,et al.  Superconductivity close to the Mott state: From condensed-matter systems to superfluidity in optical lattices , 2008, 0812.1581.

[42]  D. Efremov,et al.  Magnetism, superconductivity, and pairing symmetry in iron-based superconductors , 2008, 0807.3735.

[43]  Markus P. Mueller,et al.  Ising and Spin orders in Iron-Based Superconductors , 2008, 0804.4293.

[44]  Jiangping Hu,et al.  Theory of electron nematic order in LaFeAsO , 2008, 0804.3843.

[45]  M. Salmhofer Continuous Renormalization for Fermions and Fermi Liquid Theory , 1997, cond-mat/9706188.

[46]  C. Castellani,et al.  Fermi systems with strong forward scattering , 1997, cond-mat/9701012.

[47]  V. Yakovenko,et al.  Parquet solution for a flat Fermi surface , 1996, cond-mat/9609118.

[48]  Chandra,et al.  Ising transition in frustrated Heisenberg models. , 1990, Physical review letters.