Nuclear architecture in developmental biology and cell specialisation.

Epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications and histone variants, as well as chromatin remodelling play a fundamental role in the regulation of pre- and postimplantation mammalian development. Recent studies have indicated that nuclear architecture provides an additional level of regulation, which needs to be explored in order to understand how a fertilised egg is able to develop into a full organism. Studies of 3D preserved nuclei of IVF preimplantation embryos from different mammalian species, such as mouse, rabbit and cow, have demonstrated that nuclear architecture undergoes major changes during early development. Both similarities and species-specific differences were observed. Nuclear transfer experiments demonstrated changes of nuclear phenotypes, which to some extent reflect changes seen in IVF preimplantation embryos albeit with a different timing compared with IVF embryos. The dynamics of nuclear architecture is further substantiated by major changes during postmitotic terminal cell differentiation. Recent breakthroughs of 3D fluorescence microscopy with resolution beyond the conventional Abbe limit in combination with 3D electron microscopy provide the potential to explore the topography of nuclear structure with unprecedented resolution and detail.

[1]  T. Cremer,et al.  Evolutionary origin of the cell nucleus and its functional architecture. , 2010, Essays in biochemistry.

[2]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Networking the nucleus , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  H. Leonhardt,et al.  A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Stable Morphology, but Dynamic Internal Reorganisation, of Interphase Human Chromosomes in Living Cells , 2010, PloS one.

[5]  E. Whitelaw,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming: Enforcer or enabler of developmental fate? , 2010, Development, growth & differentiation.

[6]  Nils B Becker,et al.  Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[7]  P. Hájková Epigenetic reprogramming--taking a lesson from the embryo. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[8]  E. Meshorer,et al.  Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[9]  J. Rossant,et al.  Global Chromatin Architecture Reflects Pluripotency and Lineage Commitment in the Early Mouse Embryo , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  4D chromatin dynamics in cycling cells: Theodor Boveri's hypotheses revisited. , 2010, Nucleus.

[11]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  4D Chromatin dynamics in cycling cells , 2010 .

[12]  M. Durante,et al.  Influence of Nuclear Geometry on the Formation of Genetic Rearrangements in Human Cells , 2010, Radiation research.

[13]  A. Ponti,et al.  The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. , 2010, Genes & development.

[14]  Ieuan Clay,et al.  The transcriptional interactome: gene expression in 3D. , 2010, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[15]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Activation of Estrogen-Responsive Genes Does Not Require Their Nuclear Co-Localization , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[16]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency , 2010, Nature.

[17]  E. Barry,et al.  Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms during preimplantation development. , 2009, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[18]  Michael J. Zeitz,et al.  A probabilistic model for the arrangement of a subset of human chromosome territories in WI38 Human fibroblasts , 2009, Journal of cellular physiology.

[19]  Rolf Ohlsson,et al.  Chromosome crosstalk in three dimensions , 2009, Nature.

[20]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Revealing the high-resolution three-dimensional network of chromatin and interchromatin space: A novel electron-microscopic approach to reconstructing nuclear architecture , 2009, Chromosome Research.

[21]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Changes of higher order chromatin arrangements during major genome activation in bovine preimplantation embryos. , 2009, Experimental cell research.

[22]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Lack of bystander activation shows that localization exterior to chromosome territories is not sufficient to up-regulate gene expression. , 2009, Genome research.

[23]  K. Rippe,et al.  Dual color localization microscopy of cellular nanostructures , 2009, Biotechnology journal.

[24]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Nuclear Architecture of Rod Photoreceptor Cells Adapts to Vision in Mammalian Evolution , 2009, Cell.

[25]  D. Heermann,et al.  Spatially confined folding of chromatin in the interphase nucleus , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Cizhong Jiang,et al.  Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  Helena Fidlerová,et al.  Chromatin position in human HepG2 cells: Although being non-random, significantly changed in daughter cells , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[28]  A. Munshi,et al.  Histone modifications dictate specific biological readouts. , 2009, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[29]  Xiang-Dong Fu,et al.  Enhancing nuclear receptor-induced transcription requires nuclear motor and LSD1-dependent gene networking in interchromatin granules , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  T. Cremer,et al.  Spatial and temporal plasticity of chromatin during programmed DNA-reorganization in Stylonychia macronuclear development , 2008, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[31]  Tom Misteli,et al.  The Meaning of Gene Positioning , 2008, Cell.

[32]  M. Hausmann,et al.  SPDM: light microscopy with single-molecule resolution at the nanoscale , 2008 .

[33]  Jana Krejcí,et al.  Histone Modifications and Nuclear Architecture: A Review , 2008, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[34]  Angus I. Lamond,et al.  Nuclear functions in space and time: Gene expression in a dynamic, constrained environment , 2008, FEBS letters.

[35]  L. Wessels,et al.  Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions , 2008, Nature.

[36]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  Subdiffraction Multicolor Imaging of the Nuclear Periphery with 3D Structured Illumination Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[37]  Peter R. Cook,et al.  Similar active genes cluster in specialized transcription factories , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  H. Burkhardt,et al.  Spatial quantitative analysis of fluorescently labeled nuclear structures: Problems, methods, pitfalls , 2008, Chromosome Research.

[39]  Rolf Ohlsson,et al.  High-resolution circular chromosome conformation capture assay , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[40]  Guillaume J. Filion,et al.  Sensing X Chromosome Pairs Before X Inactivation via a Novel X-Pairing Region of the Xic , 2007, Science.

[41]  A. Arneodo,et al.  Chromosome neighborhood composition determines translocation outcomes after exposure to high-dose radiation in primary cells , 2007, Chromosome Research.

[42]  Karsten Rippe,et al.  Dynamic organization of the cell nucleus. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[43]  R. van Driel,et al.  The perichromatin region: a functional compartment in the nucleus that determines large-scale chromatin folding. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[44]  A. Belmont,et al.  Moving chromatin within the interphase nucleus-controlled transitions? , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[45]  T. Cremer,et al.  Maintenance of imprinting and nuclear architecture in cycling cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Myc Dynamically and Preferentially Relocates to a Transcription Factory Occupied by Igh , 2007, PLoS biology.

[47]  S. Hell Far-Field Optical Nanoscopy , 2007, Science.

[48]  S. Berger The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription , 2007, Nature.

[49]  P. Fraser,et al.  Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation , 2007, Nature.

[50]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Epigenomic differentiation in mouse preimplantation nuclei of biparental, parthenote and cloned embryos , 2007, Chromosome Research.

[51]  C. Cremer,et al.  Cell Type-Specific Quantitative Predictions of Radiation-Induced Chromosome Aberrations: A Computer Model Approach , 2007, Radiation research.

[52]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Positioning of the mouse Hox gene clusters in the nuclei of developing embryos and differentiating embryoid bodies. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[53]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Nuclear reorganisation and chromatin decondensation are conserved, but distinct, mechanisms linked to Hox gene activation , 2007, Development.

[54]  T. Misteli Beyond the Sequence: Cellular Organization of Genome Function , 2007, Cell.

[55]  T. Cremer,et al.  Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[56]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[57]  D. Zink,et al.  Architectural reorganization of the nuclei upon transfer into oocytes accompanies genome reprogramming , 2006, Molecular reproduction and development.

[58]  M. Fornerod,et al.  Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[59]  R. Singer,et al.  Nucleus and gene regulation. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[60]  A. Pombo,et al.  Intermingling of Chromosome Territories in Interphase Suggests Role in Translocations and Transcription-Dependent Associations , 2006, PLoS biology.

[61]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Long-Range Directional Movement of an Interphase Chromosome Site , 2006, Current Biology.

[62]  P. Becker,et al.  Regulation of higher-order chromatin structures by nucleosome-remodelling factors. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[63]  T. Cremer,et al.  Exploiting nuclear duality of ciliates to analyse topological requirements for DNA replication and transcription , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[64]  R. Flavell,et al.  Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci , 2005, Nature.

[65]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development , 2005, Development.

[66]  Florence Hediger,et al.  The function of nuclear architecture: a genetic approach. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[67]  Mark Groudine,et al.  Gene Order and Dynamic Domains , 2004, Science.

[68]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[69]  S. Fakan The functional architecture of the nucleus as analysed by ultrastructural cytochemistry , 2004, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[70]  Mark Groudine,et al.  Form follows function: The genomic organization of cellular differentiation. , 2004, Genes & development.

[71]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Differences in centromere positioning of cycling and postmitotic human cell types , 2004, Chromosoma.

[72]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. , 2004, Genes & development.

[73]  Wendy A. Bickmore,et al.  The Radial Positioning of Chromatin Is Not Inherited through Mitosis but Is Established De Novo in Early G1 , 2004, Current Biology.

[74]  D. Spector,et al.  The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[75]  J. Mcneil,et al.  Clustering of multiple specific genes and gene-rich R-bands around SC-35 domains , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[76]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[77]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Considering Nuclear Compartmentalization in the Light of Nuclear Dynamics , 2003, Cell.

[78]  S. Gasser,et al.  Visualizing Chromatin Dynamics in Interphase Nuclei , 2002, Science.

[79]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Spatial preservation of nuclear chromatin architecture during three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH). , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[80]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[81]  C. Allis,et al.  Translating the Histone Code , 2001, Science.

[82]  Qi Zhou,et al.  Developmental Potential of Mouse Embryos Reconstructed from Metaphase Embryonic Stem Cell Nuclei , 2001 .

[83]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[84]  U. De Boni,et al.  Nuclear topology of murine, cerebellar Purkinje neurons: changes as a function of development. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[85]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered Dam methyltransferase , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[86]  C. Allis,et al.  The language of covalent histone modifications , 2000, Nature.

[87]  Roland Eils,et al.  Separate and variably shaped chromosome arm domains are disclosed by chromosome arm painting in human cell nuclei , 1998, Chromosome Research.

[88]  J. LaSalle,et al.  Homologous Association of Oppositely Imprinted Chromosomal Domains , 1996, Science.

[89]  G van den Engh,et al.  A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[90]  U. DeBoni Chromatin motion in interphase nuclei, its modulation and its potential role in gene expression. , 1988 .

[91]  U. De Boni,et al.  Curvilinear, three-dimensional motion of chromatin domains and nucleoli in neuronal interphase nuclei. , 1986, Science.

[92]  L. Manuelidis Different central nervous system cell types display distinct and nonrandom arrangements of satellite DNA sequences. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[93]  C Cremer,et al.  Considerations on a laser-scanning-microscope with high resolution and depth of field. , 1978, Microscopica acta.

[94]  M. Gorovsky,et al.  STUDIES ON NUCLEAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN TETRAHYMENA PYRIFORMIS , 1969, The Journal of cell biology.

[95]  Jennifer A. Mitchell,et al.  Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[96]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Functional nuclear architecture studied by microscopy: present and future. , 2010, International review of cell and molecular biology.

[97]  J. Renard,et al.  Dynamics of constitutive heterochromatin: two contrasted kinetics of genome restructuring in early cloned bovine embryos. , 2010, Reproduction.

[98]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. , 2009, Science.

[99]  M. Esteller,et al.  DNA methylomes, histone codes and miRNAs: tying it all together. , 2009, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[100]  I. Skovorodkin,et al.  Response to X-ray- and cis Pt-induced DNA damage in Stylonychia lemnae (Ciliata, Protozoa) , 2003 .

[101]  C Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. , 2000, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[102]  R Eils,et al.  Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.