Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: how newspaper frames are changing

The use of climate engineering or geoengineering technologies to combat climate change has been a controversial topic, even in the scientific debate. In recent studies, it has been claimed that the debate on climate engineering technologies may be closing down prematurely, with detrimental effects on the possibility of social and ethical reflection in appraising these controversial technologies. We examined the extent to which the debate on climate engineering is opening up or closing down, analyzing the diversity of English-speaking newspaper frames in the period 2006–2011. The results provide strong support for an opening of the debate, especially since 2009, given the decline of overly deterministic frames, the emergence of frames related to sociopolitical issues and an overall more balanced distribution of the various frames. This provides evidence that different perspectives are voiced in the public debate, which may enable societies to critically reflect on these emerging technologies.

[1]  Catherine E. Crawley,et al.  Localized Debates of Agricultural Biotechnology in Community Newspapers: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Media Frames and Sources , 2007 .

[2]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance , 2009 .

[3]  M. Bunzl.  Researching geoengineering: should not or could not? , 2009 .

[4]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity. Journal of Communication , 2008 .

[6]  Daniel Cressey.  Geoengineering experiment cancelled amid patent row , 2012, Nature.

[7]  M. Hulme.  Why we disagree about climate change : understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity , 2009 .

[8]  Matthias Kohring,et al.  The Content Analysis of Media Frames: Toward Improving Reliability and Validity , 2008 .

[9]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue , 1996 .

[10]  Gareth Davies,et al.  Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty , 2010 .

[11]  C. Preston,et al.  Re-Thinking the Unthinkable: Environmental Ethics and the Presumptive Argument against Geoengineering , 2011 .

[12]  Rolf Lidskog,et al.  News media and food scares: the case of contaminated salmon , 2006 .

[13]  Arthur Petersen,et al.  Exploring the Impact of the IPCC Assessment Reports on Science , 2011 .

[14]  P. Boyd.  Geopolitics of geoengineering , 2009 .

[15]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Jeffrey T. Kiehl,et al.  Geoengineering climate Change: Treating the symptom over the cause? , 2006 .

[17]  Brigitte Nerlich,et al.  Metaphors We Die By? Geoengineering, Metaphors, and the Argument From Catastrophe , 2012 .

[18]  Jari Lyytimäki,et al.  Temporalities and environmental reporting: press news on eutrophication in Finland , 2007 .

[19]  David Fishlock,et al.  Science and the media , 1976, Nature.

[20]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Global temperature stabilization via controlled albedo enhancement of low-level maritime clouds , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Perceptions of geoengineering: public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement , 2012 .

[22]  John Virgoe,et al.  International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change , 2009 .

[23]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies , 2005 .

[24]  S. Barrett.  The Incredible Economics of Geoengineering , 2008 .

[25]  Aldric Hama.  Superfreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance , 2010 .

[26]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland) , 2010 .

[27]  M. Hulme.  Why We Disagree About Climate Change , 2009 .

[28]  A. Stirling.  “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[29]  Hannah Strauss.  Involving the Finnish public in nuclear facility licensing: participatory democracy and industrial bias , 2010 .

[30]  PHILIP W. BOYD,et al.  Ranking geo-engineering schemes , 2008 .

[31]  Nicholas Smith,et al.  Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of Trust , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[32]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Biotechnology and the American Media , 2002 .

[33]  Maxwell T. BoykoV,et al.  Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage , 2007 .

[34]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications , 2010 .

[35]  Kim M. Cobb,et al.  The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy? , 2012 .

[36]  M. Linsky,et al.  Impact How the Press Affects Federal Policymaking , 1986 .

[37]  Timothy M. Lenton,et al.  A review of climate geoengineering appraisals , 2012 .

[38]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Science-Media Interface , 2008 .

[39]  J. Corbett,et al.  Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science , 2004 .

[40]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Framing Science: A New Paradigm in Public Engagement , 2009 .

[41]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Framing as a theory of media effects , 1999 .

[42]  Gareth Davies,et al.  Framing the Social, Political, and Environmental Risks and Benefits of Geoengineering: Balancing the Hard-to-Imagine Against the Hard-to-Measure , 2011 .

[43]  Ulrika Olausson.  Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty , 2009 .

[44]  Ben Kravitz,et al.  A Test for Geoengineering? , 2010, Science.

[45]  Alan Robock,et al.  20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea , 2008 .

[46]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Framing Science , 2003 .

[47]  C. D. Vreese,et al.  News framing: Theory and typology , 2005 .