Computerized characterization of lung nodule subtlety using thoracic CT images

The goal of this work is to design computerized image analysis techniques for automatically characterizing lung nodule subtlety in CT images. Automated subtlety estimation methods may help in computer-aided detection (CAD) assessment by quantifying dataset difficulty and facilitating comparisons among different CAD algorithms. A dataset containing 813 nodules from 499 patients was obtained from the Lung Image Database Consortium. Each nodule was evaluated by four radiologists regarding nodule subtlety using a 5-point rating scale (1: most subtle). We developed a 3D technique for segmenting lung nodules using a prespecified initial ROI. Texture and morphological features were automatically extracted from the segmented nodules and their margins. The dataset was partitioned into trainers and testers using a 1:1 ratio. An artificial neural network (ANN) was trained with average reader subtlety scores as the reference. Effective features for characterizing nodule subtlety were selected based on the training set using the ANN and a stepwise feature selection method. The performance of the classifier was evaluated using prediction probability (PK) as an agreement measure, which is considered a generalization of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when the reference standard is multi-level. Using an ANN classifier trained with a set of 2 features (selected from a total of 30 features), including compactness and average gray value, the test concordance between computer scores and the average reader scores was 0.789 ± 0.014. Our results show that the proposed method had strong agreement with the average of subtlety scores provided by radiologists.

[1]  Anthony P. Reeves,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL MULTICRITERION AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF PULMONARY NODULES OF HELICAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES , 1999 .

[2]  Murray H. Loew,et al.  An objective measure for assembling databases used to train and test mammogram CAD algorithms , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[3]  M. Kendall A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[4]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  J A Swets,et al.  Enhancing and Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  Sue Francis,et al.  Physiological measurements using ultra-high field fMRI: a review , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Zaid J. Towfic,et al.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) data collection process for nodule detection and annotation , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  H P Chan,et al.  Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  K Doi,et al.  Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. , 1994, Medical physics.

[11]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Predictive Measures of Ordinal Association , 1971, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features. , 2001, Medical physics.

[13]  Robert H. Somers,et al.  A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. , 1962 .

[14]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  Richard C. Pais,et al.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. , 2011, Medical physics.

[16]  Markus Hadwiger,et al.  Real-time volume graphics , 2006, Eurographics.

[17]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  A comparison of follow-up recommendations by chest radiologists, general radiologists, and pulmonologists using computer-aided detection to assess radiographs for actionable pulmonary nodules. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  N. T. Smith,et al.  A measure of association for assessing prediction accuracy that is a generalization of non-parametric ROC area. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of association for cross classifications , 1979 .