Partnering mechanism in construction: An empirical study on the Chinese construction industry

Partnering and its principles have increasingly been introduced to the construction industry to improve the efficiency of project delivery. However, little research outlines the mechanism behind its application. This paper presents the findings of a study that was conducted to develop and test a partnering model that reveals the relationships between the critical success factors (CSFs) of partnering and demonstrates their importance to construction. With support of data collected from the Chinese construction industry, this study has revealed strong correlations among partnering CSFs, risk management, total quality management (TQM), use of incentives, and project performance. It is concluded that project success is the outcome of the interaction between a variety of techniques, and that partnering, associated with incentives, is a basic management method through which risk management and TQM can be strongly improved.

[1]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[2]  Arnold M. Ruskin,et al.  What Every Engineer Should Know About Project Management , 1982 .

[3]  A. Kadefors Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[4]  James R. Buck Economic Risk Decisions in Engineering and Management , 1989 .

[5]  Frederick D. Lazar,et al.  Project Partnering: Improving the Likelihood of Win/Win Outcomes , 2000 .

[6]  Andrew Cox,et al.  Strategic Procurement in Construction: Towards better practice in the management of construction supply chains , 1998 .

[7]  Heng Li,et al.  Construction Partnering Process and Associated Critical Success Factors: Quantitative Investigation , 2002 .

[8]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[9]  Kerry London,et al.  Construction Management: New Directions , 2002 .

[10]  Steve R. Sanders,et al.  PEER-REVIEWED PAPER:Partnering Continuum , 1998 .

[11]  Erik Larson Project Partnering: Results of Study of 280 Construction Projects , 1995 .

[12]  Liang Y Liu,et al.  Impact of management approach on project interaction and performance , 1997 .

[13]  Frederick D. Lazar,et al.  PARTNERING--NEW BENEFITS FROM PEERING INSIDE THE BLACK BOX , 1997 .

[14]  Nigel J. Smith,et al.  Managing Risk in Construction Projects , 1998 .

[15]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Partnering in Construction: Critical Study of Problems for Implementation , 2003 .

[16]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Partnering research in construction , 2000 .

[17]  G. Edward Gibson,et al.  Partnering-Project Performance in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , 1993 .

[18]  Ping Chen,et al.  An interpretive comparison of Chinese and Western conceptions of relationships in construction project management work , 2004 .

[19]  Ralph L. Kliem,et al.  Reducing Project Risk , 1997 .

[20]  Stuart D. Green,et al.  Partnering and the UK construction industry the first ten years: a review of the literature , 2001 .

[21]  Thomas R. Warne Partnering for Success , 1994 .

[22]  Terry Lyons,et al.  Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry : a survey , 2004 .

[23]  Scott Baker,et al.  Risk response techniques employed currently for major projects , 1999 .

[24]  T Chamberlain THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INSTITUTE , 1990 .

[25]  M. Bresnen,et al.  Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas , 2000 .

[26]  Stephen Ward,et al.  Project risk management , 2005 .

[27]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Structural reanalysis for topological modifications – a unified approach , 2001 .

[28]  A. Akintoye,et al.  Risk analysis and management in construction , 1997 .

[29]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTNERED PROJECT PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[30]  Henry J. Schultzel,et al.  Successful Partnering: Fundamentals for Project Owners and Contractors , 1996 .

[31]  Tzvi Raz,et al.  Use and benefits of tools for project risk management , 2001 .

[32]  M. Bresnen,et al.  Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances , 2000 .

[33]  Colin Duffield,et al.  An evaluation framework for privately funded infrastructure projects in Australia , 2001 .

[34]  Scott Baker,et al.  Survey of Risk Management in Major U.K. Companies , 1999 .

[35]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD APPROACH: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THEIR POTENTIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH , 2003 .

[36]  Akintola Akintoye,et al.  An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction , 2000 .

[37]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Construction contracts: the cost of mistrust , 2003 .

[38]  Richard L. Tucker,et al.  Partnered project performance in Texas Department of Transportation , 2000 .

[39]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Procurement strategies : a relationship-based approach , 2003 .

[40]  Denise Bower,et al.  INCENTIVE MECHANISMS FOR PROJECT SUCCESS , 2002 .

[41]  Larry G. Crowley,et al.  Conceptual Model of Partnering , 1995 .

[42]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[43]  Chi Ming Tam,et al.  Total quality management in a public transport organisation in Hong Kong , 1996 .

[44]  Roberto Pietroforte,et al.  Communication and governance in the building process , 1997 .

[45]  M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting , 2002 .

[46]  William C. Ronco,et al.  Partnering Manual for Design and Construction , 1995 .

[47]  David Arditi,et al.  Total quality management in the construction process , 1997 .

[48]  Michael T. Kubal Engineered Quality in Construction: Partnering and Tqm , 1994 .

[49]  Abdol R. Chini,et al.  ISO 9000 and the U.S. Construction Industry , 2003 .

[50]  Michael Y. Mak,et al.  Problematic issues associated with project partnering — the contractor perspective , 2002 .

[51]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Behavioral aspects in construction partnering , 2003 .