Chapter 1: New Forms of Teacher Assessment

Beginning in the 1970s and continuing through the 1980s, teacher testing initiatives swept virtually all of the 50 states. The tests mandated by the different states for entry into teacher education programs, exit from such programs, initial teacher certification, regular or permanent certification, or occasionally even for continuation of tenured teachers generally comprise little more than multiple-choice questions testing basic literacy and numeracy, "professional knowledge," and, sometimes, subject matter knowledge. For teachers already in the classroom, low-inference observation checklists are sometimes used as well. The 1990s may see fundamentally new forms of teacher tests, implemented for new purposes and reflecting new views of the teaching profession and of teaching and learning processes. The prospects are exciting, the promises as yet unfulfilled. The new assessment methods described in this chapter are, for the most part, only now being developed. Little can be said, as yet, about their psychometric properties, let alone their eventual impacts on the educational system, teachers and teaching, or schooling outcomes. Nonetheless, given the rapid emergence of new methods and applications for teacher testing, it is a propitious time for this review. The teacher tests now in common use have been strenuously and justifiably criticized for their content, their format, and their impacts, as well as the virtual absence of criterion-related validity evidence supporting their use. More fundamentally, the justification for these tests is bound up with a "bureaucratic" model of the educational system and the work of teaching. Movements toward teacher professionalization and school restructuring are creating both the possibility and the demand for new forms of teacher assessments. After summarizing criticisms of the objective teacher tests now in wide use, this chapter contrasts the bureaucratic and professional models of teaching and describes how professional examinations might differ from the teacher tests in use today. It then takes up the question of the knowledge base of teaching: What are these new forms of teacher assessment

[1]  Gary D. Estes Assessment Component of the California New Teacher Project: Second Year Report. , 1990 .

[2]  G. P. Smith,et al.  A Case Study of the Impact MINORITIES of Performance-Based Testing on the Supply of Minority Teachers , 1988 .

[3]  Lawrence M. Rudner Teacher Testing—An Update , 1988 .

[4]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[5]  G. Madaus,et al.  Chapter 5: Charms Talismanic: Testing Teachers for the Improvement of American Education , 1987 .

[6]  G. Madaus Measurement Specialists: Testing the Faith–A Reply to Mehrens , 1986 .

[7]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Analysis of the Professional Functions of Teachers. Relationships between Job Functions and the NTE Core Battery. , 1986 .

[8]  Edward H. Haertel The Valid Use of Student Performance Measures for Teacher Evaluation , 1986 .

[9]  L. Darling-Hammond A Proposal for Evaluation in the Teaching Profession , 1986, The Elementary School Journal.

[10]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[11]  L. Darling-Hammond Valuing Teachers: The Making of a Profession , 1985, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[12]  L. H. Cross Validation of the NTE tests for certification decisions. , 1985 .

[13]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Teacher Evaluation: A Study of Effective Practices , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[14]  S. Pendlebury,et al.  The Florida Performance Measurement System: A Consideration , 1985, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[15]  M. Goertz,et al.  The Impact of NTE Use by States on Teacher Selection. , 1985 .

[16]  S. Stodolsky Teacher Evaluation: The Limits of Looking , 1984 .

[17]  Ronald A. Berk,et al.  A Guide to Criterion-Referenced Test Construction , 1984 .

[18]  L. Shepard Standard Setting Issues and Methods , 1980 .

[19]  Jerry B. Ayers,et al.  Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONS. , 1979 .

[20]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Generalizability of Measures of Teaching Behavior , 1976 .

[21]  T. Quirk,et al.  Review of Studies of the Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the National Teacher Examinations1 , 1973 .

[22]  Henry Beaumont,et al.  The Measurement of Teaching , 1938 .

[23]  A. Wise,et al.  Governance Issues in the Evaluation of Elementary and Secondary Schoolteachers , 1990 .

[24]  G. Madaus 7. Legal and Professional Issuesin Teacher-Certification Testing:A Psychometric Snark Hunt , 1990 .

[25]  W. Popham 1. Face Validity: Siren Song for Teacher Testers , 1990 .

[26]  Michael A. Rebell Legal Issues Concerning Teacher Evaluation , 1990 .

[27]  R. Jaeger Setting Standards on Teacher Certification Tests , 1990 .

[28]  Edward H. Haertel Assessing the Teaching Function , 1988 .

[29]  G. P. Smith A Case Study of the Impact of Performance-Based Testing on the Supply of Minority Teachers. , 1988 .

[30]  G. Madaus,et al.  Charms Talismanic: Testing Teachers for the Improvement of American Education , 1987 .

[31]  L. Shulman Assessment for Teaching: An Initiative for the Profession. , 1987 .

[32]  D. Medley,et al.  How Valid Are Principals' Judgments of Teacher Effectiveness?. , 1987 .

[33]  G. Madaus,et al.  Teacher Certification Tests: Do They Really Measure What We Need to Know?. , 1987 .

[34]  L. Darling-Hammond Teaching Knowledge: How Do We Test It?. , 1986 .

[35]  T. Micceri,et al.  Measurement of Teacher Performance: A Study in Instrument Development. , 1985 .

[36]  Michael A. Rebell Disparate Impact of Teacher Competency Testing on Minorities: Don't Blame the Test-Takers - or the Tests , 1985 .