A Longitudinal Study of Local E-Government Development: The Policy Maker Perspective

Developments in information and communication technologies have been an enabler of enhanced, citizen focused services by governments around the world. Electronic Government, or E-Government, is widely regarded as a disruptor of traditional e-government service provision through greater citizen access, enhanced democracy, improved information quality, and a range of governmental efficiencies. Local government has been a key e-government focus for many nations due to the wide and varied interactions these governmental agencies have with citizens. A gap in the literature exists that monitors the development of local e-government, especially from the policy maker perspective, of This study presents the findings of a longitudinal study exploring the development of local e-government in New Zealand – from the policy makers’ perspective. All local and regional authorities in New Zealand were surveyed in 2000, 2004, and 2012 with the goal of understanding the key considerations associated with the development of e-government strategies and subsequent implementation of associated infrastructure. While local e-government development has been more incremental than transformational, there has been a trend towards greater consideration of citizen-focused issues including the likes of Consumer Confidence, Trust, Accessibility, The Digital Divide, Indigenous Peoples, Security, and Privacy. This offers a degree of reassurance that local authorities remain, and are indeed increasingly, focused on the provision of enhanced services to the communities they serve.

[1]  Christopher Podmore Information economics and policy: In the United States edited by Michael Rubin Libraries Unlimited, Littleton, CO 1983, 340 pp , 1984 .

[2]  R. Hague,et al.  Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction , 1987 .

[3]  Stephen Taylor,et al.  E-shock — The Electronic Shopping Revolution: Strategies for Retailers and Manufacturers , 1999 .

[4]  Janet Newman,et al.  Developments: Transforming Local Government: Innovation and Modernization , 2001 .

[5]  Dave Griffin,et al.  Local government: A digital intermediary for the information age? , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[6]  Julian Teicher,et al.  E-government in Australia: Promise and progress , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[7]  Eric Deakins,et al.  E‐government in New Zealand: the local authority perspective , 2002 .

[8]  A. Ho Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative , 2002 .

[9]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[10]  Phil Turner,et al.  The use and management of geographic information in local e-government in the UK , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[11]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Successful e-government in Singapore , 2004, CACM.

[12]  Subhajit Basu,et al.  E‐government and developing countries: an overview , 2004 .

[13]  Gerald Grant,et al.  Developing a Generic Framework for E-Government , 2005, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[14]  John F. Affisco,et al.  E-government: a strategic operations management framework for service delivery , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[15]  Sarah Cotterill,et al.  Transformational Government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services , 2007 .

[16]  Stuart Dillon,et al.  A Comparison between e-Government Practices in New Zealand and Oman , 2007 .

[17]  Stuart Dillon,et al.  A Comparison between E-Government Practices in Taiwan and New Zealand , 2007 .

[18]  Omiros D. Sarikas,et al.  Realising integrated e‐government services: a UK local government perspective , 2007 .

[19]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  A framework for evaluating web sites of public authorities , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[20]  Vicente Pina,et al.  E-government evolution in EU local governments: a comparative perspective , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[21]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Do they want it? Do they use it? The 'Demand-Side' of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Eric Deakins,et al.  Local e‐government impact in China, New Zealand, Oman, and the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[23]  Federico Belotti,et al.  Technology Adoption and Innovation in Public Services: The Case of E-Government in Italy , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[24]  Jing Wang,et al.  Research on e-Government evaluation model based on the principal component analysis , 2011, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[25]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  The tension between user-centred design and e-government services , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Proposing a reference process model for the citizen‐centric evaluation of e‐government services , 2013 .

[27]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Silver Surfers, E-government and the Digital Divide: An Exploratory Study of UK Local Authority Websites and Older Citizens , 2013, Interact. Comput..

[29]  D. Norris,et al.  Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change? , 2013 .

[30]  Marlei Pozzebon,et al.  Rethinking e-government performance assessment from a citizen perspective , 2013 .

[31]  B. Wirtz,et al.  Local level E-government in international comparison , 2013 .

[32]  Eric Deakins,et al.  Local e-Government Transformation - An International Comparison , 2013, WEBIST.

[33]  Laura Alcaide-Muñoz,et al.  Public Managers’ Perceptions of e-Government Efficiency: A Case Study of Andalusian Municipalities , 2014 .

[34]  Bandana Kar,et al.  A Study of Local Government Website Inclusiveness: The Gap Between E-government Concept and Practice , 2016, Inf. Technol. Dev..