Histopathological assessment of prognostic factors in pancreatic resection specimens using a standardised protocol

Summary Background Adenocarcinoma involving the pancreas shows differences in prognostic parameters including resection margin status depending on subtype. Aim To assess the reported incidence of each type and the rate of R1 resection using detailed histopathological examination protocol. Methods All pancreaticoduodenectomies between June 2011 and June 2013 at our institute were analysed. These were classified according to the site of origin, R1 status, size, stage at resection, lymph node status and the rate of lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Results 58 adenocarcinomas included 23 ductal, 16 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) related, 8 duodenal, 7 ampullary and 4 distal common bile duct (CBD) tumours. The CBD, pancreatic ductal and IPMN-related adenocarcinomas had the highest rates of R1 resection, at 75%, 69.5 and 62.5%, with the posterior and SMV margins most frequently involved. Ampullary adenocarcinoma had lower rates of R1 resection (14%) as well as perineural invasion (0%). Conclusion Ampullary adenocarcinomas had a lower rate of R1 resection and perineural invasion, both of which are parameters associated with a poorer outcome. This correlates with literature indicating ampullary tumours have a better prognosis. Our study also highlights the high rate of detection of microscopic margin involvement when a detailed histopathological examination protocol is employed.

[1]  S. Satoi,et al.  Redefining the R1 resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma , 2016, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[2]  D. Kooby,et al.  The importance of surgical margins in pancreatic cancer , 2016, Journal of surgical oncology.

[3]  V. Deshpande,et al.  Difficult Diagnostic Problems in Pancreatobiliary Neoplasia. , 2015, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  A. Parikh,et al.  Value of Intraoperative Neck Margin Analysis During Whipple for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis of 1399 Patients , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[5]  M. D'Angelica,et al.  Dysplasia at the surgical margin is associated with recurrence after resection of non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. , 2013, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[6]  S. Maithel,et al.  Is it Time to Stop Checking Frozen Section Neck Margins During Pancreaticoduodenectomy? , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  C. Verbeke Resection margins in pancreatic cancer. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[8]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Is There a Survival Difference for R1 Resections Versus Locally Advanced Unresectable Tumors? What Is a “True” R0 Resection? , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[9]  O. Clausen,et al.  Reclassification of tumour origin in resected periampullary adenocarcinomas reveals underestimation of distal bile duct cancer. , 2012, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  B. Rau,et al.  R1 resection in pancreatic cancer has significant impact on long-term outcome in standardized pathology modified for routine use. , 2012, Surgery.

[11]  C. Verbeke,et al.  Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  Michael B Farnell,et al.  Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: implications of positive margin on survival. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[13]  M. Bloomston,et al.  Predictors of Survival in Periampullary Cancers Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  T. Keck,et al.  The Lymph Node Ratio is the Strongest Prognostic Factor after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer , 2009, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[15]  C. Verbeke,et al.  Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). , 2009, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[16]  M. Farnell,et al.  Periampullary cancers: are there differences? , 2001, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[17]  O. Clausen,et al.  Prognostic Relevance of Number and Ratio of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Resected Pancreatic, Ampullary, and Distal Bile Duct Carcinomas , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.