Radiation-driven flame weakening effects in sooting turbulent diffusion flames

Abstract The objective of the present study is to use detailed numerical modeling to bring basic information on the structure of turbulent non-premixed flames under sooting and radiating conditions. The questions of flame weakening, flame extinction, and soot leakage are studied using direct numerical simulation. Simulations of ethylene–air combustion are performed in both a reference laminar counter-flow flame configuration and a momentum-driven turbulent wall-flame configuration. In the turbulent wall-flame configuration, the flame optical thickness is artificially increased in order to magnify the role played by luminous thermal radiation. The resulting optically thickened flames feature frequent and pronounced low-temperature, low-burning-intensity spots that may be interpreted as quasi-flame extinction events. The data analysis reveals that these flame weakening events are similar to radiation extinction phenomena previously observed in microgravity laminar flames, and are associated with low values of the fuel–air mixing rate and large values of the flame radiant fraction. These events also differ from previously made observations to the extent that they are associated with soot mass leakage across the flame and occur under a broader range of flame stretch conditions, thereby suggesting that turbulent flames are more susceptible to radiation extinction than their laminar counterparts.

[1]  S. Turns.  Understanding NOx formation in nonpremixed flames: Experiments and modeling , 1995 .

[2]  A. Soufiani,et al.  Study of radiative effects on laminar counterflow H2/O2N2 diffusion flames , 1996 .

[3]  M. Fairweather,et al.  Predictions of soot formation in turbulent, non-premixed propane flames , 1992 .

[4]  Christopher R. Shaddix,et al.  Measurement of the dimensionless extinction coefficient of soot within laminar diffusion flames , 2007 .

[5]  J. B. Moss,et al.  Modelling soot formation and thermal radiation in buoyant turbulent diffusion flames , 1991 .

[6]  K. M. Leung,et al.  A simplified reaction mechanism for soot formation in nonpremixed flames , 1991 .

[7]  F. Lockwood,et al.  A new radiation solution method for incorporation in general combustion prediction procedures , 1981 .

[8]  Yi Wang,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of nonpremixed flame–wall interactions , 2006 .

[9]  S. Chan,et al.  Structure and extinction of methane-air flamelet with radiation and detailed chemical kinetic mechanism , 1998 .

[10]  Amable Liñán,et al.  The asymptotic structure of counterflow diffusion flames for large activation energies , 1974 .

[11]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Several new numerical methods for compressible shear-layer simulations , 1994 .

[12]  M. Pinar Mengüç,et al.  Radiation heat transfer in combustion systems , 1987 .

[13]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Simplified Reaction Mechanisms for the Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels in Flames , 1981 .

[14]  Arvind Atreya,et al.  Effect of radiative heat loss on diffusion flames in quiescent microgravity atmosphere , 1998 .

[15]  M. Modest.  Radiative heat transfer , 1993 .

[16]  G. H. Markstein.  Relationship between smoke point and radiant emission from buoyant turbulent and laminar diffusion flames , 1985 .

[17]  R. Lewis,et al.  Low-storage, Explicit Runge-Kutta Schemes for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 2000 .

[18]  Hong G. Im,et al.  Characteristic boundary conditions for simulations of compressible reacting flows with multi-dimensional, viscous and reaction effects , 2007 .

[19]  S. Lele.  Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[20]  C. Sung,et al.  Microgravity burner-generated spherical diffusion flames: experiment and computation Currently a , 2001 .

[21]  J. B. Moss,et al.  Modeling soot formation and burnout in a high temperature laminar diffusion flame burning under oxygen-enriched conditions , 1995 .

[22]  Henning Bockhorn,et al.  Soot Formation in Combustion , 1994 .

[23]  D. Thévenin,et al.  Accurate Boundary Conditions for Multicomponent Reactive Flows , 1995 .

[24]  D. Urban,et al.  Radiative Extinction of Gaseous Spherical Diffusion Flames in Microgravity , 2006 .

[25]  Yi Wang,et al.  Characteristic boundary conditions for direct simulations of turbulent counterflow flames , 2005 .

[26]  A. Marchese,et al.  Microgravity n-Heptane Droplet Combustion in Oxygen-Helium Mixtures at Atmospheric Pressure , 1998 .

[27]  Pierre Joulain,et al.  The behavior of pool fires: State of the art and new insights , 1998 .

[28]  K. Maruta,et al.  Extinction of low-stretched diffusion flame in microgravity , 1998 .

[29]  C. Law,et al.  The effect of flame structure on soot formation and transport in turbulent nonpremixed flames using direct numerical simulation , 2007 .

[30]  G. H. Markstein,et al.  Radiant emission and absorption by laminar ethylene and propylene diffusion flames , 1985 .

[31]  M. Pinar Mengüç,et al.  Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer , 2020 .

[32]  J. B. Moss,et al.  Predictions of soot and thermal radiation properties in confined turbulent jet diffusion flames , 1999 .

[33]  Fabian Mauss,et al.  Laminar Flamelet Structure at Low and Vanishing Scalar Dissipation Rate , 2000 .

[34]  Christopher A. Kennedy,et al.  Improved boundary conditions for viscous, reacting, compressible flows , 2003 .

[35]  T. Poinsot.  Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows , 1992 .

[36]  A. Marchese,et al.  The Effect of Non-Luminous Thermal Radiation in Microgravity Droplet Combustion , 1997 .

[37]  Chung King Law,et al.  Structure and extinction of diffusion flames with flame radiation , 1991 .

[38]  J. B. Moss,et al.  Flowfield modelling of soot formation at elevated pressure , 1989 .

[39]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  CHEMKIN-III: A FORTRAN chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical and plasma kinetics , 1996 .

[40]  M. Matalon,et al.  Extinction of spherical diffusion flames in the presence of radiant loss , 1998 .