Energy economic evaluation of solar and nuclear driven steam methane reforming processes

Abstract Changing the high temperature heat supply of energy intensive industries from today’s mostly fossil sources to nuclear or renewable sources offers the opportunity of massive reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. Even though the high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) as well as the solar tower is technically capable to supply heat at the required high temperature level, it is uncertain whether these technologies can compete with the fossil energy supply. Therefore, the aim of this paper is the assessment of the economic competitiveness of process heat supply by HTGR or solar tower to fossil fired processes using steam methane reforming as industrial example process. Applying a self-developed optimization model, energy economic analyses are conducted for nuclear, solar and fossil energy supply systems. The results are benchmarked with the Hydrogen Economic Evaluation Program (HEEP) of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and compared to literature values. The analyses show that hydrogen generation costs of the solar tower system are higher than those of the HTGR system. Both technologies benefit from the support of a fossil heater, as the hydrogen generation costs can be significantly reduced even with a small amount of burned natural gas. Nevertheless, a steam methane reforming process run by HTGR or by solar tower is not yet competitive to the natural gas fired hydrogen production.

[1]  Matthias Hänel,et al.  Jülich Solar Power Tower—Experimental Evaluation of the Storage Subsystem and Performance Calculation , 2011 .

[2]  K. Verfondern,et al.  Nuclear Energy for Hydrogen Production , 2007 .

[3]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Economics of High-Temperature Nuclear Reactors for Industrial Cogeneration , 2012 .

[4]  Thomas Pregger,et al.  Perspektiven solarthermischer Verfahren zur Wasserstofferzeugung , 2008 .

[5]  Garvin A. Heath,et al.  Molten Salt Power Tower Cost Model for the System Advisor Model (SAM) , 2013 .

[6]  Giampaolo Caputo,et al.  Solar steam reforming of natural gas for hydrogen production using molten salt heat carriers , 2008 .

[7]  F. H. Southworth,et al.  Impact of demand load size on strategies for reliable process heat supply , 2012 .

[8]  H. Müller-Steinhagen Concentrating solar thermal power , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  M. Sterner,et al.  Energiespeicher - Bedarf, Technologien, Integration , 2014 .

[10]  Bernhard Hoffschmidt,et al.  High-temperature Thermal Storage System for Solar Tower Power Plants with Open-volumetric Air Receiver Simulation and Energy Balancing of a Discretized Model , 2014 .

[11]  L. Stoddard,et al.  Economic, Energy, and Environmental Benefits of Concentrating Solar Power in California , 2006 .

[12]  James E. O'Brien,et al.  System Evaluation and Economic Analysis of a Nuclear Reactor Powered High-Temperature Electrolysis Hydrogen-Production Plant , 2010 .

[13]  F. Mueller-Langer,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes for the hydrogen economy for the short and medium term , 2007 .

[14]  James E. O'Brien,et al.  Analysis of Improved Reference Design for a Nuclear-Driven High Temperature Electrolysis Hydrogen Production Plant , 2010 .

[15]  Christian Sattler,et al.  Hydrogen Production by Solar Reforming of Natural Gas: A Comparison Study of Two Possible Process Configurations , 2006 .

[16]  I. Khamis,et al.  HEEP: A new tool for the economic evaluation of hydrogen economy , 2010 .

[17]  Gerhard Weinrebe,et al.  Technische, ökologische und ökonomische Analyse von solarthermischen Turmkraftwerken , 2000 .

[18]  H. Reutler,et al.  Advantages of going modular in HTRs , 1984 .

[19]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  Power Tower Technology Roadmap and Cost Reduction Plan , 2011 .