The Returns Generation Process, Returns Variance, and the Effect of Thinness in Securities Markets

Garman (1976). Further, our treatment of the returns generation process allows for upward drift in security prices, and thus is consistent with the submartingale model of efficient capital markets [see, e.g., Fama (1970)]. Our analysis does not focus upon incomplete equilibria, and thus is distinguished from Copeland's (1976) model of time-distributed price-volume adjustments under sequential arrival of information. The model of the returns generation process is used to obtain the expected value and variance of security returns. This is done first for returns based on bid/ask price quotations (which we call "quotation returns") and then for returns based on transaction prices (which we call "transaction returns"). Although we abstract from the bid-ask spread, a separate analysis of transaction returns is needed because demand shifts need not trigger transactions, and hence closing transaction prices, unlike closing quotes, need not reflect all current information. Our interest in the moments of returns distributions is focused primarily on variance,' and on the existence of a relationship between variance and the value of shares outstanding for individual securities. We consider the market value of shares outstanding for a security to be an (inverse) proxy measure of thinness in the

[1]  Emanuel Parzen,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 1962 .

[2]  F. Black Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing , 1972 .

[3]  R. R. West,et al.  Marketability of Common Stocks in Canada and the U.S.A.: A Comparison of Agent versus Dealer Dominated Markets , 1974 .

[4]  K. J. Cohen,et al.  THE DETERMINANTS OF COMMON STOCK RETURNS VOLATILITY: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON , 1976 .

[5]  S. Fischer Assets, Contingent Commodities, and the Slutsky Equations , 1972 .

[6]  Slutsky Equations for Assets , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Thomas E. Copeland,et al.  A Model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival , 1976 .

[8]  W. Silber Thinness in Capital Markets: The Case of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange , 1975, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[9]  K. J. Cohen,et al.  The impact of designated market makers on security prices , 1977 .

[10]  J. Mossin Security pricing theory and its implications for corporate investment decisions , 1972 .

[11]  B. Peirce A short table of integrals , 1898 .

[12]  H. Demsetz,et al.  The Cost of Transacting , 1968 .

[13]  George J. Benston,et al.  Determinants of bid-asked spreads in the over-the-counter market , 1974 .

[14]  R. R. West,et al.  Competition and the Pricing of Dealer Service in the Over-the-Counter Stock Market , 1972, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[15]  S. M. Tiniç The Economics of Liquidity Services , 1972 .

[16]  Myron S. Scholes The Market for Securities: Substitution Versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices , 1972 .

[17]  E. Fama EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK* , 1970 .

[18]  Robert A. Schwartz,et al.  THE TIME‐VARIANCE RELATIONSHIP: EVIDENCE ON AUTOCORRELATION IN COMMON STOCK RETURNS , 1977 .

[19]  F. Black,et al.  The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests , 2006 .

[20]  J. Cramer,et al.  A dynamic approach to the theory of consumer demand , 1957 .

[21]  G. Stigler The Economics of Information , 1961, Journal of Political Economy.