False Beliefs in Unreliable Knowledge Networks

The aims of this work are: (1) to extend knowledge dynamics analysis in order to assess the influence of false beliefs and unreliable communication channels, (2) to investigate the impact of selection rule-policy for knowledge acquisition, (3) to investigate the impact of targeted link attacks (“breaks” or “infections”) of certain “healthy” communication channels. We examine the knowledge dynamics analytically, as well as by simulations on both artificial and real organizational knowledge networks. The main findings are: (1) False beliefs have no significant influence on knowledge dynamics, while unreliable communication channels result in non-monotonic knowledge updates (“wild” knowledge fluctuations may appear) and in significant elongation of knowledge attainment. Moreover, false beliefs may emerge during knowledge evolution, due to the presence of unreliable communication channels, even if they were not present initially, (2) Changing the selection rule-policy, by raising the awareness of agents to avoid the selection of unreliable communication channels, results in monotonic knowledge upgrade and in faster knowledge attainment, (3) “Infecting” links is more harmful than “breaking” links, due to “wild” knowledge fluctuations and due to the elongation of knowledge attainment. Moreover, attacking even a “small” percentage of links (≤5%) with high knowledge transfer, may result in dramatic elongation of knowledge attainment (over 100%), as well as in delays of the onset of knowledge attainment. Hence, links of high knowledge transfer should be protected, because in Information Warfare and Disinformation, these links are the “best targets”.

[1]  Matthew Horridge,et al.  Justification based explanation in ontologies , 2012 .

[2]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[3]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[4]  Zhao-Long Hu,et al.  Knowledge diffusion in the collaboration hypernetwork , 2015 .

[5]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Relation‐specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships , 2006 .

[6]  I-Chieh Hsu,et al.  Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through human capital: A preliminary test , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  Division of Attention: The Single-Channel Hypothesis Revisited , 1989 .

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[9]  S. Blackmore.  The Meme Machine , 1999 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[11]  Sergei N. Artëmov.  The Ontology of Justifications in the Logical Setting , 2012, Stud Logica.

[12]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Road To Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games , 1996 .

[13]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[14]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[15]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[16]  Rob Cross,et al.  Managing Change through Networks and Values , 2007 .

[17]  Stefan J. Troche,et al.  Personality and the psychological refractory period: No evidence for an extraversion- or intelligence-related effect , 2011 .

[18]  Robin Cowan,et al.  The dynamics of collective invention , 2003 .

[19]  T. Davenport.  Thinking for a living : how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers , 2005 .

[20]  James E. Allen,et al.  Formal versus Informal Knowledge Networks in R&D: A Case Study Using Social Network Analysis , 2007 .

[21]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[22]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Investigating the Microstructure of Network Evolution: Alliance Formation in the Mobile Communications Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Evguenii V. Kurmyshev,et al.  Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: concord against partial antagonism , 2011, ArXiv.

[24]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[25]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[26]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[27]  M. Castells.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[28]  R. Atkinson.  Innovation Economics: The Race for Global Advantage , 2012 .

[29]  Dail Fields,et al.  Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[30]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[32]  Pier Paolo Saviotti,et al.  The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: a social network analysis , 2011 .

[33]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[34]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  The synergy of social network analysis and knowledge mapping: a case study , 2006 .

[35]  Fritz Machlup,et al.  Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance, Volume I: Knowledge and Knowledge Production , 1984 .

[36]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Networks containing negative ties , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[37]  Elisa Giuliani,et al.  Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile , 2013 .

[38]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[39]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[40]  Mike Reeve,et al.  The Information Society as a Complex System , 2000, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[41]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Structural effects of R&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity , 2012 .

[43]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[44]  Mohamed Amine Chatti.  Knowledge Management: A Personal Knowledge Network Perspective , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[47]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration , 2002 .

[48]  Nicolas Jonard,et al.  Knowledge Dynamics in a Network Industry , 2004 .

[49]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[50]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[51]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[52]  E. Giuliani.  The Selective Nature of Knowledge Networks in Clusters: Evidence from the Wine Industry , 2007 .

[53]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Categorical attribute based centrality: E-I and G-F centrality , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[54]  Jun Ma,et al.  Estimating the effect of organizational structure on knowledge transfer: A neural network approach , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[55]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[56]  M. Fritsch,et al.  The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks , 2010 .

[57]  Salvatore Parise.  Knowledge Management and Human Resource Development: An Application in Social Network Analysis Methods , 2007 .

[58]  Fritz Machlup,et al.  Knowledge : its creation, distribution, and economic significance , 1980 .

[59]  Qiang Guo,et al.  Improved knowledge diffusion model based on the collaboration hypernetwork , 2015 .

[60]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[61]  Haoxiang Xia,et al.  Adjustment of knowledge-connection structure affects the performance of knowledge transfer , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[62]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[63]  Raul Toral,et al.  Mass media and repulsive interactions in continuous-opinion dynamics , 2010, 1004.0103.

[64]  M. Patrizia Vittoria,et al.  Knowledge networks and dynamic capabilities as the new regional policy milieu. A social network analysis of the Campania biotechnology community in southern Italy , 2014 .

[65]  Lars Huemer,et al.  Trustworthiness, Risk, and the Transfer of Tacit and Explicit Knowledge between Alliance Partners , 2008 .

[66]  Donald E. Knuth.  Two notes on notation , 1992 .

[67]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[68]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity , 2011 .

[69]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  A network model of knowledge accumulation through diffusion and upgrade , 2011 .

[70]  Douglas L. MacLachlan,et al.  Disseminative capacity, organizational structure and knowledge transfer , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[71]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Exploring the Social Ledger: Negative Relationships and Negative Asymmetry in Social Networks in Organizations , 2006 .

[72]  Min Lin,et al.  Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer , 2010 .

[73]  Alan Kirman,et al.  The economy as an evolving network , 1997 .