Multi-centre evaluation of the Etest method for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. BSAC Working Party on Antifungal Chemotherapy.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Ghannoum,et al. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections. Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Labora , 1997, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
[2] J. Martínez-Suárez,et al. Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[3] M. Trautmann,et al. Comparative evaluation of three antifungal susceptibility test methods for Candida albicans isolates and correlation with response to fluconazole therapy , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[4] A. Bolmström,et al. Multisite reproducibility of the Etest MIC method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[5] M. Pfaller,et al. Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[6] G. Gilbert,et al. Antifungal susceptibility testing using the E test: comparison with the broth macrodilution technique. , 1996, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.
[7] J. Rex,et al. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing: enhanced ability to detect amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.
[8] M. Rinaldi,et al. Evaluation of the E test system versus a microtitre broth method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts against fluconazole and itraconazole. , 1995, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
[9] J. Martínez-Suárez,et al. Correlation of in-vitro susceptibility test results with clinical response: a study of azole therapy in AIDS patients. , 1995, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.
[10] E. Anaissie,et al. Detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates in a broth-based system , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.
[11] M. Rinaldi,et al. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[12] M. Rinaldi,et al. Comparative study of broth macrodilution and microdilution techniques for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' proposed standard , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[13] M. Pfaller,et al. Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution, and E test antifungal susceptibility tests for fluconazole , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[14] A. Espinel-Ingroff. Etest for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. , 1994, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.
[15] M. Pfaller,et al. Comparative evaluation of alternative methods for broth dilution susceptibility testing of fluconazole against Candida albicans , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[16] J. Galgiani,et al. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[17] M. Ghannoum,et al. Susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: a microdilution technique , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.
[18] A. Espinel-Ingroff,et al. Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.