Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators?

OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of the newly implemented Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) triage system in a redesigned 200-bed community hospital emergency department (ED) and to evaluate the predictive validity of CTAS in this setting. METHODS Triage system performance was analyzed on the basis of 4 quality indicators: time to triage; triage duration; proportion of patients who left without being seen by a physician; and waiting time to nurse and physician, stratified by triage level and reported as fractile response rates. The predictive validity of CTAS was evaluated by investigating the relationship between CTAS level, hospitalization index, ED length of stay (LOS) and diagnostic test utilization. RESULTS During the study period, 32 574 patients were triaged and 32 261 were eligible for study. Eighty-five percent were triaged within 10 minutes, and 98% had a triage duration of < 5 minutes. Waiting times to nurse and physician were within CTAS time objectives in 96.3% and 92.3% of cases respectively. The left without being seen (LWBS) rate was 0.96%. Hospitalization rates were compatible with CTAS standards for adults in Levels I, II, III and V and for children in Level V. Median LOS and laboratory test utilization were highly correlated with CTAS Levels II to V (p < 0.01), and similar correlation between triage acuity and imaging utilization was noted in adult patients with non-traumatic non-musculoskeletal complaints (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The CTAS is adaptable to countries beyond Canada and its operating objectives are achievable. Time to triage and fractile response rates can be considered indicators of triage quality and ED performance. CTAS is a valid instrument for predicting admission rates, hospital LOS and diagnostic utilization.

[1]  R A Dershewitz,et al.  Patients who leave a pediatric emergency department without treatment. , 1986, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[3]  M. Bullard,et al.  Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. , 2004, CJEM.

[4]  M. Weissberg,et al.  Patients who leave without being seen. , 1986, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  J. Christenson,et al.  Use of continuous quality improvement to facilitate patient flow through the triage and fast-track areas of an emergency department. , 1995, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[6]  J. Christenson,et al.  Continuous quality improvement reduces length of stay for fast-track patients in an emergency department. , 1996, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  K. McNamara Patients leaving the ED without being seen by a physician: is same-day follow-up indicated? , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  J. Gravel Evaluation of the Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale in an Emergency Department , 2002 .

[9]  C. Fernandes,et al.  Emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician: the Toronto Hospital experience. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  D Tandberg,et al.  Hospital factors associated with emergency center patients leaving without being seen. , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  R H Brook,et al.  Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physician. Causes and consequences. , 1991, JAMA.

[12]  T. Brophy Emergency patients who leave without being seen: Are urgently ill or injured patients leaving without care?: Sainsbury S Milit Med 155: 460–464 Oct 1990 , 1991 .

[13]  J. Christenson,et al.  Does reduced length of stay decrease the number of emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician? , 1997, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[14]  S. Sainsbury Emergency patients who leave without being seen: are urgently ill or injured patients leaving without care? , 1990, Military medicine.

[15]  D W Baker,et al.  Patients who leave emergency departments without being seen by a physician: magnitude of the problem in Los Angeles County. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  D. Kyriacou,et al.  A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  David J. Magid,et al.  Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physician , 1992 .

[18]  Carol Conroy,et al.  Rapid process redesign in a university-based emergency department: decreasing waiting time intervals and improving patient satisfaction. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.