Considerations for an Institution for Evaluation of Diabetes Technology Devices to Improve Their Quality in the European Union

All medical devices used for self-monitoring of blood glucose (BG), insulin injection, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and continuous glucose monitoring in the European Union (EU) must have a Communauté Européenne (CE) mark. However, the approval process for obtaining this mark is different from that used by the European Medicines Agency in the EU for drugs or by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States for such medical and in vitro diagnostic devices. The notified bodies involved in the CE mark process perform this evaluation in cooperation with the manufacturers. They have only limited diabetes know-how; they have to handle all kinds of medical devices. There are devices for therapy on the market in the EU (i.e., they have market approval) that do not fulfill quality requirements, as indicated, for example, in the international norm ISO 15197 for BG test systems. Evaluation of the performance of such systems is usually provided by the manufacturers. What is missing in the EU is an independent institution that performs regular and critical evaluation of the quality of devices used for diabetes therapy before and also after their market approval. The work of such an institution would focus on BG test systems (these represent two-thirds of the market of medical devices for diabetes treatment) but would also evaluate the performance of other devices. It has to be clarified what legal framework is required for such an institution and how it can be financed; probably this can be done in a shared manner by the manufacturers of such devices and the health insurance companies. Positive evaluation results should be a prerequisite prior to any reimbursement for such devices.

[1]  Gunn B B Kristensen,et al.  Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[2]  Christina Schmid,et al.  Lot-to-Lot Variability of Test Strips and Accuracy Assessment of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose according to ISO 15197 , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[3]  Andreas Pfützner,et al.  Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices , 2012, Current medical research and opinion.

[4]  Christina Schmid,et al.  System Accuracy Evaluation of 43 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197 , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[5]  Guido Freckmann,et al.  System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[6]  Lutz Heinemann Measurement Quality of Blood Glucose Meters: Is There a Need for an Institution with an Unbiased View? , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[7]  S. Del Prato,et al.  Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: Time for reform? , 2012, Diabetologia.

[8]  Christopher G Parkin,et al.  Performance Variability of Seven Commonly Used Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Systems: Clinical Considerations for Patients and Providers , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[9]  Sverre Sandberg,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose with a focus on analytical quality: an overview , 2010, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.