A three-dimensional shape optimization system—shop3D

Abstract A modular approach for shape optimization of three-dimensional solid structures is described. A major consideration in the development of this capability is the desire to use a commercially available finite element program, such as NASTRAN, for analysis. Since NASTRAN cannot be called as a subroutine, a system architecture was developed of independently executable modules in which sequential execution is controlled by job control language. Also, shape sensitivities are not commonly available in commercial programs. A hybrid approach which is based on the material derivative concept is developed to obtain shape sensitivities by post processing finite element results stored on files. A quick generation of a good optimization model combined with an efficient optimization system will result in a drastic design time saving. In this paper, different modeling approaches for shape optimization are discussed. Emphasis will be placed upon a special modeling technique which overlays the design model onto an already existing finite element model. Several automotive related examples are used to evaluate the program's effectiveness.

[1]  C. V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Structural Shape Optimization Using Penalty Functions , 1974 .

[2]  M. E. Botkin,et al.  SHAPE OPTIMIZATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL STAMPED AND SOLID AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS , 1986 .

[3]  M. E. Botkin,et al.  Shape optimization of three-dimensional folded-plate structures , 1985 .

[4]  M. S. Shephard,et al.  Automatic Finite Element Modeling for Use with Three-Dimensional Shape Optimization , 1986 .

[5]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Comparison Between the Variational and Implicit Differentiation Approaches to Shape Design Sensitivities , 1986 .

[6]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems , 1986 .

[7]  M. Imam.  Three‐dimensional shape optimization , 1982 .

[8]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  A modular approach for three-dimensional shape optimization of structures , 1987 .

[9]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  Variational approach by means of adjoint systems to structural optimization and sensitivity analysis—II: Structure shape variation , 1984 .

[10]  Mark E. Botkin,et al.  Optimum Shape: Automated Structural Design , 1986 .

[11]  M. E. Botkin,et al.  Structural shape optimization with geometric description and adaptive mesh refinement , 1985 .

[12]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Elastic Structures , 1983 .

[13]  M. E. Botkin.  An adaptive finite element technique for plate structures , 1985 .

[14]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Comment on "Methods of Design Sensitivity Analysis in Structural Optimization" , 1980 .

[15]  C. Fleury,et al.  Shape optimal design - A performing C.A.D. oriented formulation , 1984 .

[16]  J. Cavendish.  Automatic triangulation of arbitrary planar domains for the finite element method , 1974 .

[17]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  CONMIN: A FORTRAN program for constrained function minimization: User's manual , 1973 .

[18]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Accuracy of the domain material derivative approach to shape design sensitivities , 1987 .

[19]  M. E. Botkin,et al.  Shape Optimization of Plate and Shell Structures , 1981 .

[20]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  On 3-D modeling and automatic regridding in shape design sensitivity analysis , 1987 .

[21]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Accuracy of Finite Element Based Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis , 1985 .

[22]  A. Belegundu,et al.  A shape optimization approach based on natural design variables and shape functions , 1988 .