Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the position of the optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction intervals for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS In 90 patients, coronary dual-source CT angiography was performed without beta-blocking agents. Data were reconstructed in 5% steps throughout the R-R interval. Two independent readers selected optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for each major coronary vessel--the right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending artery (LAD), and left circumflex artery (LCX)--using a 3D viewer and volume-rendering displays. The motion score for each vessel was graded from 1 (no motion artifacts) to 5 (severe motion artifacts over entire vessel). RESULTS The average heart rate of all patients was 68.7 beats per minute (bpm) (range, 43-119 bpm). The median optimal systolic reconstruction windows were at 35%, 30%, and 35% for the RCA, LAD, and LCX, respectively. The median optimal diastolic reconstruction window was at 75% for all vessels. The mean motion scores (+/- SD) in the systolic reconstructions were 1.9 +/- 0.8 (RCA), 1.7 +/- 0.5 (LAD), and 2.0 +/- 0.6 (LCX). The mean motion scores for the diastolic reconstructions were 1.7 +/- 0.9, 1.5 +/- 0.6, and 1.6 +/- 0.7, respectively. In patients with a heart rate of < 70 bpm, motion scores were significantly lower in diastole versus systole (1.3 +/- 0.4 and 1.9 +/- 0.5, respectively; p < 0.01). In most patients with a heart rate of > 80 bpm, motion scores were lower in systolic than in diastolic reconstructions (2.1 +/- 0.6 and 2.6 +/- 0.8, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Using dual-source CT, the overall optimal reconstruction window is at 75% of the R-R interval in patients with low or intermediate heart rates. In patients with heart rates of > 80 bpm, systolic reconstructions often yield superior image quality compared with diastolic reconstructions.

[1]  T. Flohr,et al.  Coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and optimal reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT at 375-ms gantry rotation time , 2005, European Radiology.

[2]  Mathias Langer,et al.  Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography With 370-Millisecond Gantry Rotation Time: Evaluation of the Best Image Reconstruction Interval , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[4]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[5]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Determinants of Duration and Mean Rate of Ventricular Ejection , 1958, Circulation research.

[6]  S. Kovacs,et al.  Duration of diastole and its phases as a function of heart rate during supine bicycle exercise. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[7]  L. S. Fridericia,et al.  The Duration of Systole in an Electrocardiogram in Normal Humans and in Patients with Heart Disease * , 2003, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[8]  Thomas J Vogl,et al.  Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[9]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience , 2006, European Radiology.

[11]  Does dual-energy CT of lower-extremity tendons incur penalties in patient radiation exposure or reduced multiplanar reconstruction image quality? , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  C. Claussen,et al.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice spiral computed tomography: image quality in patients with high heart rates , 2006, European Radiology.

[13]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Impact of bulk cardiac motion on right coronary MR angiography and vessel wall imaging , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Carl J. Wiggers,et al.  STUDIES ON THE CONSECUTIVE PHASES OF THE CARDIAC CYCLE , 1921 .

[15]  B. Ohnesorge,et al.  Heart Rate Adaptive Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Electrocardiogram-Gated Multislice Spiral CT of the Heart , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  W. Kalender,et al.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[17]  A. Taştan,et al.  Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  H. Boudoulas,et al.  Linear relationship between electrical systole, mechanical systole, and heart rate. , 1981, Chest.

[20]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[21]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  A model for temporal resolution of multidetector computed tomography of coronary arteries in relation to rotation time, heart rate and reconstruction algorithm , 2007, European Radiology.

[22]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Duration of the Phases of Left Ventricular Systole , 1963, Circulation research.

[23]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT , 2006, European Radiology.

[24]  Dual-source CT coronary imaging in heart transplant recipients: image quality and optimal reconstruction interval , 2008, European Radiology.

[25]  M. Budoff,et al.  Coronary Artery Motion During the Cardiac Cycle and Optimal ECG Triggering for Coronary Artery Imaging , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[26]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. , 2007, Radiology.

[27]  S. Halliburton,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Multi-Slice CT System with 16-Slice Detector and Increased Gantry Rotation Speed for Isotropic Submillimeter Imaging of the Heart , 2003, Herz.

[28]  K Stierstorfer,et al.  Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[29]  M. Reiser,et al.  Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[30]  J. Fabián,et al.  Duration of phases of left ventricular systole using indirect methods. I. Normal subjects. , 1972, British heart journal.

[31]  W Moshage,et al.  In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[32]  W. Little,et al.  Invasive evaluation of left ventricular diastolic performance. , 1990, Herz.

[33]  Coronary CT Angiography Without β-Blockers , 2007 .