NOT ALL SINGLE LEG SQUATS ARE EQUAL: A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THREE VARIATIONS.

BACKGROUND The single leg squat (SLS) is a functional task used by practitioners to evaluate and treat multiple pathologies of the lower extremity. Variations of the SLS may have different neuromuscular and biomechanical demands. The effect of altering the non-stance leg position during the SLS on trunk, pelvic, and lower extremity mechanics has not been reported. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare trunk, pelvic, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and hip, knee, and ankle kinetics of three variations of the SLS using different non-stance leg positions: SLS-Front, SLS-Middle, and SLS-Back. METHODS Sixteen healthy women performed the three SLS tasks while data were collected using a motion capture system and force plates. Joint mechanics in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes were compared for the SLS tasks using a separate repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each variable at two analysis points: peak knee flexion (PKF) and 60 ° of knee flexion (60KF). RESULTS Different non-stance leg positions during the SLS resulted in distinct movement patterns and moments at the trunk, pelvis, and lower extremity. At PKF, SLS-Back exhibited the greatest kinematic differences (p < 0.05) from SLS-Front and SLS-Middle with greater ipsilateral trunk flexion, pelvic anterior tilt and drop, hip flexion and adduction, and external rotation as well as less knee flexion and abduction. SLS-Back also showed the greatest kinetic differences (p < 0.05) from SLS-Front and SLS-Middle with greater hip external rotator moment and knee extensor moment as well as less hip extensor moment and knee adductor moment at PKF. At 60KF, the findings were similar except at the knee. CONCLUSION The mechanics of the trunk, pelvis, and lower extremity during the SLS were affected by the position of the non-stance leg in healthy females. Practitioners can use these findings to distinguish between SLS variations and to select the appropriate SLS for assessment and rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.

[1]  L. Herrington.  Knee valgus angle during single leg squat and landing in patellofemoral pain patients and controls. , 2014, The Knee.

[2]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Clinical Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2013, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[3]  M. Harris-Hayes,et al.  Clinical Presentation of Patients with Symptomatic Anterior Hip Impingement , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  V. Graci,et al.  Trunk and lower extremity segment kinematics and their relationship to pain following movement instruction during a single-leg squat in females with dynamic knee valgus and patellofemoral pain. , 2015, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[5]  J. McKeon,et al.  Hip-muscle activation during the lunge, single-leg squat, and step-up-and-over exercises. , 2009, Journal of sport rehabilitation.

[6]  Carlos Dias Maciel,et al.  Trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee kinematics, hip strength, and gluteal muscle activation during a single-leg squat in males and females with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. , 2012, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[7]  Timothy C. Mauntel,et al.  The Effects of Lower Extremity Muscle Activation and Passive Range of Motion on Single Leg Squat Performance , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  Paul DeVita,et al.  Trunk position modulates anterior cruciate ligament forces and strains during a single-leg squat. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Bruce H Jones,et al.  Consortium for health and military performance and American College of Sports Medicine Summit: utility of functional movement assessment in identifying musculoskeletal injury risk. , 2014, Current sports medicine reports.

[10]  Claudio Belvedere,et al.  Multi-segment trunk kinematics during locomotion and elementary exercises. , 2011, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  RobRoy L Martin,et al.  Functional performance testing of the hip in athletes: a systematic review for reliability and validity. , 2012, International journal of sports physical therapy.

[12]  Cara L. Lewis,et al.  Differences in Lower Extremity and Trunk Kinematics between Single Leg Squat and Step Down Tasks , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  Anthony G. Schache,et al.  Performance on the Single-Leg Squat Task Indicates Hip Abductor Muscle Function , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  I. Davis,et al.  Are mechanics different between male and female runners with patellofemoral pain? , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Timothy L. Uhl,et al.  Differences in Kinematics and Electromyographic Activity between Men and Women during the Single-Legged Squat * , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  Electromyographic Analysis of Single-Leg, Closed Chain Exercises: Implications for Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. , 2002, Journal of athletic training.

[17]  I. Davis,et al.  The effect of a hip-strengthening program on mechanics during running and during a single-leg squat. , 2011, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[18]  Alexis Ortiz,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of the Athlete's Knee: From Basic Science to Clinical Application , 2011, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Yamazaki,et al.  Differences in kinematics of single leg squatting between anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients and healthy controls , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[20]  Valentina Graci,et al.  Gender differences in trunk, pelvis and lower limb kinematics during a single leg squat. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[21]  Ross A Clark,et al.  Impairment of Dynamic Single‐Leg Balance Performance in Individuals With Hip Chondropathy , 2013, Arthritis care & research.

[22]  G K Cole,et al.  Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: a standardization proposal. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.