A Complete Framework to Support Controlled Burst Retransmission in Optical Burst Switching Networks

It is widely accepted that retransmitting bursts in Optical Burst Switching networks improves the throughput at higher layers. Since the data is transported in large bursts and there are burst losses due to contention, indiscriminate retransmission can defeat the purpose of burst-level retransmissions. For many applications, retransmission after a certain time would be of no use and it may not be necessary to retransmit all the lost packets. We propose a framework for retransmission with parameters to control the retransmission rate and thus the increase in the network load. We propose a network model for controlled retransmission and a modified functional architecture of the ingress node. The existing work lacks an accurate analysis to estimate the impact of retransmissions on the network load while studying the improvement in the end-to-end packet recovery. We provide theoretical analysis to evaluate the load at each node due to both fresh and retransmitted bursts. We propose some metrics to quantify the benefit of retransmission and the impact of the retransmission parameters proposed on the network performance. We show that with controlled retransmission, the buffer requirement at the ingress node is proportional to the steady-state rate of retransmitted bursts. We validate the analytical model arid also study the impact of retransmission on the network performance with extensive simulations.

[1]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[2]  S. Horiguchi,et al.  Hybrid deflection and retransmission routing schemes for OBS networks , 2006, 2006 Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing.

[3]  Vinod Vokkarane,et al.  Analysis of TCP over optical burst-switched networks with burst retransmission , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[4]  Guido Appenzeller,et al.  Sizing router buffers , 2004, SIGCOMM '04.

[5]  Hai Le Vu,et al.  OBS contention resolution performance , 2007, Perform. Evaluation.

[6]  Christoph M. Gauger,et al.  Performance of converter pools for contention resolution in optical burst switching , 2002, SPIE ITCom.

[7]  Vinod Vokkarane,et al.  Evaluation of burst retransmission in optical burst-switched networks , 2005, 2nd International Conference on Broadband Networks, 2005..

[8]  Vinod Vokkarane,et al.  Burst segmentation: an approach for reducing packet loss in optical burst switched networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[9]  Won Ryu,et al.  Performance of a Partial Burst Retransmission Mechanism in OBS Networks , 2006, International conference on Networking and Services (ICNS'06).

[10]  Kang Sungsoo,et al.  Performance of a Partial Burst Retransmission Mechanism in OBS Networks , 2005 .

[11]  Brian L. Mark,et al.  Performance modeling of optical-burst switching with fiber delay lines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  Optical burst switching: a new area in optical networking research , 2004, IEEE Netw..

[13]  Yijun Xiong,et al.  Control architecture in optical burst-switched WDM networks , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  M. Kohn,et al.  Comparison of contention resolution strategies in OBS network scenarios , 2004, Proceedings of 2004 6th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX804).

[15]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[16]  Nen-Fu Huang,et al.  Performance analysis of deflection routing in optical burst-switched networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.