Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: The tuning of aftereffects in the temporal domain

Abstract Adaptation-induced changes in the temporal-frequency tuning and direction selectivity of cat visual cortical cells were studied. Aftereffects were induced largely independent of direction. Adapting in either direction reduced responses in both directions. Aftereffects in the direction opposite that adapted were only slightly weaker than were aftereffects in the adapted direction. No cell showed any enhancement of responses to drifting test stimuli after adapting with moving gratings. Adapting in a cell's null direction usually had no effect. Dramatic differences between the adaptation characteristics of moving and stationary stimuli were observed, however. Furthermore, aftereffects were temporal frequency specific. Temporal frequency-specific aftereffects were found in both directions: adapting in one direction induced frequency-specific effects in both directions. This bidirectionality of frequency-specific aftereffects applied to the spatial domain as well. Often, aftereffects in the direction opposite that adapted were more narrowly tuned. In general, adaptation could shift a cell's preferred temporal frequency. Aftereffects were most prominent at high temporal frequencies when testing in the adapted direction. Aftereffects seemed to be more closely linked to temporal frequency than to velocity matching. These results constrain models of cortical connectivity. In particular, we argue against schemes by which direction selectivity is generated by inhibiting a cell specifically when stimulated in the nonpreferred direction. Instead, we argue that cells receive bidirectional spatially and temporally tuned inputs, which could combine in spatiotemporal quadrature to produce direction selectivity.

[1]  A. Saul,et al.  Adaptation in single units in visual cortex: The tuning of aftereffects in the spatial domain , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Cynader,et al.  Direction-selective adaptation in simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Functionally distinct groups of X‐cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. II. Retinal inputs and the generation of receptive-field properties. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Receptive-field properties and classification of cells. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Motion after-effects in cat striate cortex elicited by moving texture , 1986, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Temporal aspects of spatial adaptation. A study of the tilt aftereffect , 1986, Vision Research.

[8]  A. Saul,et al.  Modeling and simulation II: specificity models for visual cortex development , 1986 .

[9]  L. Maffei,et al.  Interocular transfer of adaptation after effect in neurons of area 17 and 18 of split chiasm cats. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Mechanisms of human motion perception revealed by a new cyclopean illusion. , 1986, Science.

[11]  G. Orban,et al.  Velocity selectivity in the cat visual system. I. Responses of LGN cells to moving bar stimuli: a comparison with cortical areas 17 and 18. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  M. B. Mandler,et al.  Temporal frequency discrimination above threshold , 1984, Vision Research.

[17]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  P. Thompson Discrimination of moving gratings at and above detection threshold , 1983, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Dean Adaptation-induced alteration of the relation between response amplitude and contrast in cat striate cortical neurones , 1983, Vision Research.

[21]  S. Ullman,et al.  Adaptation and gain normalization , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[22]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Velocity after-effects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[23]  J D Victor,et al.  How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[25]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Movement aftereffects in the visual cortex. , 1978, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[26]  A. Sillito Inhibitory processes underlying the directional specificity of simple, complex and hypercomplex cells in the cat's visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  R. Vautin,et al.  Responses of single cells in cat visual cortex to prolonged stimulus movement: neural correlates of visual aftereffects. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  W. Lovegrove Inhibition in simultaneous and successive contour interaction in human vision , 1976, Vision Research.

[29]  P. Heggelund,et al.  Long-term retention of the “gilinsky-effect” , 1976, Vision Research.

[30]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Inhibition and disinhibition of direction-specific mechanisms in human vision , 1975, Nature.

[31]  H R Wilson,et al.  A synaptic model for spatial frequency adaptation. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  A. Pantle Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analyzers. , 1974, Vision research.

[33]  R. Lange,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision and the threshold for adaptation. , 1973, Vision research.

[34]  D. Tolhurst Adaptation to square‐wave gratings: inhibition between spatial frequency channels in the human visual system , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  J. Pokorny Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[36]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  R Sekuler,et al.  Contrast response of human visual mechanismsensitive to orientation and direction of motion. , 1969, Vision research.

[39]  C. McCollough Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.

[40]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Aftereffect of Seen Motion with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1963, Science.

[41]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .