Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of verbal discrimination learning revealed by positron emission tomography.

Why do some people have better memory abilities than others? This issue has been of long-standing interest to scientists and lay people. However, using purely behavioral methods, psychologists have made little progress in illuminating it. Now that functional brain imaging techniques have become available to study mind/brain relations, there is a new promise of understanding individual differences in learning and memory in terms of corresponding differences in brain activity. In this paper, we will present a positron emission tomography (PET) study designed to examine individual differences in learning and memory abilities. The basic assumption is that different patterns of brain activity serve as strong predictors of memory performance. Two specific questions were addressed in this study: (i) Can PET illuminate the relations between memory processes and their neuroanatomical correlates among individual learners and rememberers? and (ii) if so, how are these relations affected by the stage of practice on a given memory task? Our PET study examined individual differences in the neuroanatomical correlates of multi-trial verbal discrimination learning in 16 young healthy subjects. The results identified patterns of brain regions in which blood flow correlated with subjects' retrieval performance. However, these regions did not correlate with performance during all learning trials. Instead, a gradual shift was observed from one pattern of brain regions to another over the course of learning. These results suggest that individual differences in memory performance are related to differences in neural activity within specific brain circuits.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation of the human hippocampal formation during auditory-verbal long-term memory function , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Neural Activity during Memory Encoding and Retrieval: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  L. Squire,et al.  Contrasting Effects on Discrimination Learning after Hippocampal Lesions and Conjoint Hippocampal–Caudate Lesions in Monkeys , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  M D'Esposito,et al.  The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  S. Houle,et al.  Activation of medial temporal structures during episodic memory retrieval , 1996, Nature.

[6]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Desmond,et al.  Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. , 1998, Science.

[8]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[11]  J. Foster,et al.  The hippocampus and delayed recall: bigger is not necessarily better? , 1999, Memory.

[12]  M. Mishkin,et al.  An early and a late developing system for learning and retention in infant monkeys. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Compensatory reallocation of brain resources supporting verbal episodic memory in Alzheimer's disease , 1996, Neurology.

[14]  Gen Sobue,et al.  Medial temporal atrophy and memory impairment in early stage of Alzheimer’s disease: an MRI volumetric and memory assessment study , 2000, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[15]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Brain imaging of memory , 2000 .

[16]  F. Craik,et al.  Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Buckner,et al.  Dissociation of human prefrontal cortical areas across different speech production tasks and gender groups. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional imaging of procedural motor learning: Relating cerebral blood flow with individual subject performance , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[19]  W. James The principles of psychology , 1983 .

[20]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Differential functional connectivity of prefrontal and medial temporal cortices during episodic memory retrieval , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[21]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[22]  Benton J. Underwood,et al.  The Composition of Episodic Memory. , 1977 .

[23]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[24]  Daniel S. O'Leary,et al.  Sample Size and Statistical Power in [15O]H2O Studies of Human Cognition , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[25]  A R McIntosh,et al.  Positron emission tomography correlations in and beyond medial temporal lobes , 1999, Hippocampus.

[26]  C. Jack,et al.  Memory and MRI-based hippocampal volumes in aging and AD , 2000, Neurology.

[27]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory retrieval mode. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J L McGaugh,et al.  Amygdala activity at encoding correlated with long-term, free recall of emotional information. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  E. Murray,et al.  Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[30]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[31]  E. Tulving,et al.  Hippocampal PET activations of memory encoding and retrieval: The HIPER model , 1998, Hippocampus.

[32]  Long-term effects of neonatal damage to the hippocampal formation and amygdaloid complex on object discrimination and object recognition in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 1999 .

[33]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Memory: Theory and Recent PET Results , 1995 .

[34]  R. Deacon,et al.  Effects of aspiration lesions of hippocampus or overlying neocortex on concurrent and configural object discriminations in rats , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  Gurindar S. Sohi,et al.  Memory systems , 1996, CSUR.

[36]  J R Moeller,et al.  Individual differences in PET activation of object perception and attention systems predict face matching accuracy. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[37]  C. Frith,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of episodic memory , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[39]  G. Mangun,et al.  Successful Verbal Encoding into Episodic Memory Engages the Posterior Hippocampus: A Parametrically Analyzed Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  L R Squire,et al.  A reexamination of the concurrent discrimination learning task: the importance of anterior inferotemporal cortex, area TE. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[41]  E. Tulving,et al.  PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional Connectivity in Auditory–Verbal Short-Term Memory in Alzheimer's Disease , 1996, NeuroImage.

[43]  R. Kuzniecky,et al.  MRI extrahippocampal volumes and visual memory: Correlations independent of MRI hippocampal volumes in temporal lobe epilepsy patients , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[44]  I. Hyman,et al.  Individual differences and the creation of false childhood memories. , 1998, Memory.

[45]  B. Underwood,et al.  A frequency theory of verbal-discrimination learning. , 1966, Psychological review.

[46]  M Corbetta,et al.  Preserved speech abilities and compensation following prefrontal damage. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[48]  Individual differences in susceptibility to memory illusions , 1998 .

[49]  Max A Viergever,et al.  Volumetric analysis of frontal lobe regions in schizophrenia: relation to cognitive function and symptomatology , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[50]  D. Schacter,et al.  Memory systems of 1999 , 2000 .

[51]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Age-related reductions in human recognition memory due to impaired encoding. , 1995, Science.

[52]  R. Dolan,et al.  Dissociating prefrontal and hippocampal function in episodic memory encoding , 1997, Nature.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .