论文信息 - Study to the effectiveness of the UNECE Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP). Protocol and cost of additional measures. Phase II: Estimated emission reduction and cost of options for a possible revision of the POP Protocol

Study to the effectiveness of the UNECE Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP). Protocol and cost of additional measures. Phase II: Estimated emission reduction and cost of options for a possible revision of the POP Protocol

The rationale is that during the review of the POP Protocol there will be a need for an assessment of the potential for further emission reduction and costs of a possible revision of the Protocol. The sources of POPs listed in the Protocol that are to be addressed revision of the POP Protocol have been selected based on the projected remaining emissions upon full implementation 2020, with the exception of emissions from domestic residential consultation with the commissioner of the project it has been evaluate the potential of emission reduction by addressing combustion sources although there emissions may be relevant. motivation for this choice is the foreseen difficulties in legislation, and enforcement of relevant emission control measures

[1] R. V. Van driesche,et al. COMPARATIVE COST OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WHITEFLY CONTROL IN POINSETTIA: IS THERE A GAP? , 2002 .

[2] Darrel D. Nicholas,et al. COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL AND COPPER NAPHTHENATE IN A LONG TERM FIELD STAKE TEST , 2000 .

[3] W. Winiwarter,et al. Baseline Scenarios for the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Programme , 2004 .

[4] A. Appendices,et al. European Union Risk Assessment Report , 2008 .

[5] A.J.H. Visschedijk,et al. Incremental cost and remaining emission in 2010 of Heavy Metals (HM) resulting from the implementation of the draft HM Protocol under the UN/ECE Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution , 1998 .