View-based strategy for reorientation by geometry

SUMMARY Human and non-human animals can use geometric information (metric information and left–right discrimination sense) to reorient themselves in an environment. The hypothesis that in so doing they rely on allocentric (map-like) representations has received wide consensus. However, theoretical models suggest that egocentric representations may represent efficient strategies for visuo-spatial navigation. Here, we provide, for the first time, evidence that a view-based strategy is effectively used by animals to reorient themselves in an array of landmarks. Domestic chicks were trained to locate a food-reward in a rectangular array of either four indistinguishable or distinctive pipes. In the key experimental series, the pipes had four openings, only one of which allowed the chicks to access the reward. The direction of the open access relative to the array was either maintained stable or it was changed throughout training. The relative position of the pipes in the array was maintained stable in both training conditions. Chicks reoriented according to configural geometry as long as the open access pointed in the same direction during training but failed when the positions of the openings was changed throughout training. When the correct pipe was characterized by a distinctive featural cue, chicks learnt to locate the reward irrespective of the stability of the direction to openings, indicating that place-navigation was dissociated from non-spatial learning. These findings provide evidence that view-based strategies to reorient by geometry could be used by animals.

[1]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[2]  Ido Bossema,et al.  Jays and oaks: An eco-ethological study of a symbiosis , 1979 .

[3]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[5]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[6]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  T. Bever,et al.  Cognitive maps in rats and humans , 1990 .

[8]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Landmark use by pigeons in a touch-screen spatial search task , 1992 .

[10]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[11]  M L Spetch,et al.  Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[13]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  LANDMARK USE BY NAVIGATING RATS (RATTUS NORVEGICUS) : CONTRASTING GEOMETRIC AND FEATURAL INFORMATION , 1998 .

[14]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[15]  ALAN C. KAMIL,et al.  Patterns of movement and orientation during caching and recovery by Clark’s nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Sharon R. Doerkson,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans : II . Generality Across Search Tasks , 2001 .

[17]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  J. Gavin Bremner,et al.  Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens). , 2001 .

[19]  C J Whitaker,et al.  Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[20]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  The role of landmarks in cotton-top tamarin spatial foraging: evidence for geometric and non-geometric features , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[22]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.

[23]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[24]  Edward J Golob,et al.  Differences between appetitive and aversive reinforcement on reorientation in a spatial working memory task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[26]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  Memory use in insect visual navigation , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[28]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[30]  Dora Biro,et al.  Familiar route loyalty implies visual pilotage in the homing pigeon. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  Luca Tommasi,et al.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[33]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[34]  Ken Cheng,et al.  More psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  D. Biro,et al.  Homing pigeons develop local route stereotypy , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. Pearce,et al.  Transfer of Spatial Behaviour Controlled by a Landmark Array with a Distinctive Shape , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[37]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[39]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Reflections on geometry and navigation , 2005, Connect. Sci..

[40]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[41]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[42]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[43]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Dissecting the Geometric Module , 2006, Psychological science.

[44]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[45]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Reorientation and Landmark-Guided Search by Young Children , 2006, Psychological science.

[46]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[47]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish. , 2007, Psychological science.

[48]  Brett M Gibson,et al.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) encode the shape of an array of discrete objects. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[49]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[50]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.

[51]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[52]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures: comparative and developmental perspectives , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[53]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Children's use of geometry for reorientation. , 2008, Developmental science.

[55]  D. M. Kelly,et al.  Use of a geometric rule or absolute vectors: Landmark use by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[56]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[57]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Animals as Natural Geometers , 2009 .

[58]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Doing Socrates experiment right: controlled rearing studies of geometrical knowledge in animals , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[59]  Antoine Wystrach,et al.  Ants Learn Geometry and Features , 2009, Current Biology.

[60]  Joseph H. R. Maes,et al.  Spatial reorientation in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Use of geometric and featural information as a function of arena size and feature location , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[61]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[62]  Natalie M. Myres,et al.  Distinctive Paleo-Indian Migration Routes from Beringia Marked by Two Rare mtDNA Haplogroups , 2009, Current Biology.

[63]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Features enhance the encoding of geometry , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[64]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model. , 2009, Psychological review.

[65]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Reorienting strategies in a rectangular array of landmarks by domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). , 2010, Journal of comparative psychology.

[66]  Michael R. W. Dawson,et al.  Using perceptrons to explore the reorientation task , 2010, Cognition.