Diet Composition, Forage Selection, and Potential for Forage Competition Among Elk, Deer, and Livestock on Aspen–Sagebrush Summer Range

Abstract We evaluated elk (Cervus elaphus), mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), cattle (Bos taurus), and domestic sheep (Ovis aries) diet composition, diet overlap, and forage selection on aspen (Populus tremuloides Michaux)–sagebrush (Artemisia spp. L.) summer range in northeastern Nevada to understand potential for forage competition to provide better information for managing these communities. Diets were determined through microhistological fecal analysis from 1998 to 2000, and forage selection was evaluated at feeding sites in aspen and sagebrush communities in 1999 and 2000. Elk spring diets were the most diverse in composition; summer elk diets were dominated by forbs (59%–78%); deer consumed mostly woody browse (64%–72%); and cattle and sheep ate mostly graminoids. Lupines (Lupinus spp. L.) constituted ≥ 11% of elk, deer, and sheep diets in summer. Spurred lupine (Lupinus caudatus Kellogg) was the lupine typically selected in feeding sites and greatest consumption occurred in summer when total alkaloid levels were lowest. Highest diet overlap was between cattle and sheep in 1999 (68%) and lowest between deer and cattle in 2000 (3%). Summer elk and deer diets overlapped moderately (45%–59%). Diets did not differ between elk in spring with sheep, elk in summer with deer and sheep, or cattle with sheep. Cattle foraged selectively on forbs in aspen communities (68%) and on graminoids in sagebrush communities (88%), reflecting relative forage availabilities. We detected no differences among elk, cattle, and sheep for forage selection in aspen communities. Electivity indices indicated elk preferred forbs in aspen and sagebrush communities; cattle preferred graminoids in sagebrush; and foraging sheep preferred forbs in aspen. Our results suggest potential for forage competition among ungulates on aspen–sagebrush summer range is highest for forbs in aspen communities. Monitoring productivity and use of key forage species, particularly forbs in aspen communities, should complement management objectives on shared aspen–sagebrush summer range.

[1]  P. Gogan,et al.  Elk and deer diets in a coastal prairie-scrub Mosaic, California. , 1995 .

[2]  T. A. Hanley,et al.  Food resource partitioning by sympatric ungulates on Great Basin rangeland. , 1982 .

[3]  Jonathan A. Jenks,et al.  Effect of compositing samples on analysis of fecal nitrogen , 1989 .

[4]  H. D. Smith,et al.  Diet similarity between elk and deer in Utah , 1989 .

[5]  L. Ellison Subalpine Vegetation of the Wasatch Plateau, Utah , 1954 .

[6]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[7]  T. A. Hanley The nutritional basis for food selection by ungulates. , 1982 .

[8]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Nonsynchronous Spatial Overlap of Lizards in Patchy Habitats , 1970 .

[9]  R. Hofmann Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system , 1989, Oecologia.

[10]  V. S. Ivlev,et al.  Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes , 1962 .

[11]  Thor E. Stephenson,et al.  Drought Effect on Pronghorn and Other Ungulate Diets , 1985 .

[12]  R. Keeler Lupin alkaloids from teratogenic and nonteratogenic lupins. III. Identification of anagyrine as the probable teratogen by feeding trials. , 1976, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[13]  J. Holechek,et al.  Magnification and shrub stemmy material influences on fecal analysis accuracy. , 1985 .

[14]  M. Bugalho,et al.  The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment: a case of summer nutritional constraint? , 2003 .

[15]  P. Abrams SOME COMMENTS ON MEASURING NICHE OVERLAP , 1980 .

[16]  Richard Mark Hansen,et al.  Food relations of wild free roaming horses to livestock and big game, Red Desert, Wyoming. , 1977 .

[17]  D. C. Bowden,et al.  Ungulate Grazing in Sagebrush Grassland: Mechanisms of Resource Competition , 1996 .

[18]  J. Holechek Concepts Concerning Forage Allocation to Livestock and Big Game , 1980 .

[19]  J. Pfister,et al.  Cattle diets in tall forb communities on mountain rangelands , 1992 .

[20]  John Merriam Kingsbury,et al.  Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada , 1964 .

[21]  John Aitchison,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data , 1986 .

[22]  John G. Kie,et al.  Cattle distribution, habitats, and diets in the Sierra Nevada of California. , 1996 .

[23]  D. C. Bowden,et al.  Ungulate Grazing in Sagebrush Grassland: Effects of Resource Competition on Secondary Production , 1996 .

[24]  Margaret A. Nemeth,et al.  Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis , 1998, Technometrics.

[25]  K. Harper,et al.  Factors influencing productivity of two mule deer herds in Utah. , 1978 .

[26]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[27]  N. West,et al.  Measurements of Terrestrial Vegetation , 1989 .

[28]  W. B. Collins,et al.  Feeding behavior and habitat selection of mule deer and elk on northern Utah summer range , 1983 .

[29]  J. Pfister,et al.  The effect of body condition on disposition of alkaloids from silvery lupine (Lupinus argenteus pursh) in sheep. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[30]  Jim Fowler,et al.  Practical Statistics for Field Biology , 1991 .

[31]  P. Cheeke,et al.  Natural toxicants in feeds, forages, and poisonous plants. , 1998 .