Modeling ecological impacts of landscape change

Growth and development in the Rocky Mountain West have increased employment and output at the expense of loss and fragmentation of wildlife habitats, and other environmental impacts. An Ecosystem Landscape Modeling System (ELMS) is proposed for evaluating the potential ecological and economic impacts of future landscape changes in rapidly growing areas of the Rocky Mountain West. ELMS consists of an economic model, land use change model, ecological assessment model, and policy model. The economic model uses IMPLAN and various assumptions to estimate changes in employment and output for alternative future growth rates for sectors in the study area. Future changes in employment and output are translated into land use requirements for residential housing and commercial establishments. Future changes in the extent and location of land converted from undeveloped land classes (undeveloped land zoned residential, agricultural land and private forest land) to developed land classes (residential housing and commercial establishments) are simulated by the land use change model. The ecological assessment model evaluates impacts of land use changes on potential and realized habitat for selected species. The policy model specifies alternative residential and commercial development, infrastructure expansion, and natural resource conservation policies that are incorporated in the economic and land use change models. Results from ELMS can be used to evaluate potential trade-offs between economic and ecological values associated with future growth and development. Trade-off analysis compares increases in employment and output to decreases in potential and effective habitat for the species over time for alternative futures. ELMS has the potential to improve land use planning and management in the Rocky Mountain West.

[1]  Paul G. R. Smith,et al.  Evaluating natural areas using multiple criteria: Theory and practice , 1987 .

[2]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  A Multispecies Approach to Ecological Valuation and Conservation , 2003 .

[3]  Denis White,et al.  Planning Alternative Future Landscapes in Oregon: Evaluating Effects on Water Quality and Biodiversity , 2000, Landscape Journal.

[4]  W. Solecki,et al.  SOUTH FLORIDA: THE REALITY OF CHANGE AND THE PROSPECTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY: The role of global-to-local linkages in land use/land cover change in South Florida , 2001 .

[5]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management , 2002 .

[6]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[7]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992 , 1999 .

[8]  Denis White,et al.  ALTERNATIVE FUTURES FOR THE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON , 2004 .

[9]  Tony Prato,et al.  Multiple attribute evaluation of landscape management , 2000 .

[10]  Jill S. Baron,et al.  Management of Land Use Conflicts in the United States Rocky Mountains , 2000 .

[11]  W. Adger,et al.  Land Use and the Causes of Global Warming , 1995 .

[12]  Tony Prato,et al.  Multiple attribute decision analysis for ecosystem management , 1999 .

[13]  B. Turner,et al.  Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspective , 1995 .

[14]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  Alternative Futures for Changing Landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin In Arizona And Sonora , 2003 .

[15]  Virginia H. Dale,et al.  Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management: A landscape-transition matrix approach for land management , 2002 .

[16]  P. Vitousek.  Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change , 1994 .

[17]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks , 2000 .

[18]  Dennis Ojima,et al.  The global impact of land-use change , 1994 .