Cradle-to-gate assessment of environmental impacts for a broad set of biomass-to-product process chains

PurposeThis study advocates a modular approach combining unit processes as building blocks to formulate biomass process chains. This approach facilitates a transparent environmental life cycle impact assessment for bio-based products. It also enhances the ability to develop and assess more complex biorefinery systems, identifies critical parameters and offers useful material to support environmental impact assessment in early design stages.MethodsTwenty-three different products were assessed with regard to the environmental burden associated with their production paths. Life cycle inventories (LCIs) for 32 unit processes were compiled (using information from pilot plants, simulation and literature data) and organized in biomass process chains. Then, 58 study systems were formed based on various combinations of the unit processes, each study system referring to the production of a selected product. Three indicators were used for quantification of the impacts: non-renewable fossil cumulative energy demand (CED), global warming potential (GWP) and water depletion as defined in the ReCiPe method.Results and discussionFactors influencing the variation of results even for similar products are discussed (e.g. production path and allocation method lead to a range of GWP values for ethylene production from 0.43 to 3.37 kg CO2 eq/kg ethylene). For the majority of bio-products, CED has lower values than fossil-based equivalents (average difference 39–70 MJ eq/kg product depending on the allocation method), while mixed trends are obtained for the GWP and water depletion indicators. Assessments also highlight attributes that have a significant effect in the environmental profile of a production path such as the synthesis path, the process chemistry (water intensity) and process-related factors (energy intensity, degree of energy integration/heat recovery).ConclusionsThe analysis of impacts per unit process is able to demonstrate the particular production stages featuring high environmental intensities along a path further hinting to suggestions for amendments and improvements from an overall performance perspective. The study makes a useful source for biorefinery design studies especially in adopting a modular approach to represent and to analyse biomass process chains; it also provides a reference point for comparison (benchmarking) between different process technologies for biomass utilization. Finally, the analysis is compatible with the standards of the LCA methodology, and it is based on the use of the most common LCA databases, which facilitates the comparison of the results with other relevant studies.

[1]  J Villegas,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[2]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass , 2010 .

[3]  Terje Fuglerud,et al.  Recent advancements in ethylene and propylene production using the UOP/Hydro MTO process , 2005 .

[4]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Jhuma Sadhukhan,et al.  Economic and environmental impact marginal analysis of biorefinery products for policy targets , 2014 .

[6]  Pascale Champagne,et al.  A biorefinery processing perspective: treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Daniela Thomas,et al.  Biorefinery: Toward an industrial metabolism. , 2009, Biochimie.

[8]  M. Fatih Demirbas,et al.  Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: A critical review , 2009 .

[9]  Susanne B. Jones,et al.  Techno-economic Analysis for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Gasoline via the Methanol-to-Gasoline (MTG) Process , 2009 .

[10]  Birgit Kamm,et al.  Biorefineries – Industrial Processes and Products , 2005 .

[11]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Medium and Long-term Opportunities and Risks of the Biotechnological Production of Bulk Chemicals from Renewable Resources , 2006 .

[12]  T. Seager,et al.  Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production: Biochemical Versus Thermochemical Conversion , 2010, Environmental management.

[13]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Sustainable development in practice : case studies for engineers and scientists , 2005 .

[14]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Bioenergy , 2011 .

[15]  Bouchra Benjelloun-Mlayah,et al.  Biorefining of wheat straw using an acetic and formic acid based organosolv fractionation process. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[16]  James H. Clark,et al.  Towards a holistic approach to metrics for the 21st century pharmaceutical industry , 2015 .

[17]  Ioannis V. Skiadas,et al.  Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems , 2009 .

[18]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process , 2009 .

[19]  Aidong Yang,et al.  A decision support environment for the high-throughput model-based screening and integration of biomass processing paths , 2015 .

[20]  Simone P. Souza,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel , 2010 .

[21]  F. Santarelli,et al.  A Set of Coherent Indicators for the Assessment of the Energy Profitability of Energy Systems , 2013 .

[22]  L. Schebek,et al.  Environmental impacts of a lignocellulose feedstock biorefinery system: An assessment , 2009 .

[23]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals , 2010 .

[24]  Antonis C. Kokossis,et al.  Design of integrated biorefineries , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[25]  A. Hoekstra Virtual water trade : A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade , 2003 .

[26]  Anna Björklund,et al.  LCA of biorefinieries -identification of key issues and methodological recommendations , 2013 .

[27]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study , 2010 .

[28]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  A comprehensive environmental assessment of petrochemical solvent production , 2009 .

[29]  A. Aden,et al.  Thermochemical Ethanol via Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis of Lignocellulosic Biomass , 2007 .

[30]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[31]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Life cycle inventory for thermal treatment of waste solvent from chemical industry: a multi-input allocation model , 2005 .

[32]  Jhuma Sadhukhan,et al.  Economic value and environmental impact (EVEI) analysis of biorefinery systems , 2013 .

[33]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  GHG balances of bioenergy systems – Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns , 2010 .

[34]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Calculating the influence of alternative allocation scenarios in fossil fuel chains , 2007 .

[35]  Alfredo Iriarte,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of sunflower biodiesel: Identification of its key factors in the supply chain , 2013 .

[36]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fine chemical production: a case study of pharmaceutical synthesis , 2010 .

[37]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Review of methodological choices in LCA of biorefinery systems ‐ key issues and recommendations , 2015 .

[38]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of lactic acid production from glycerol using cascade bio- and chemocatalysis , 2015 .

[39]  Antonis C. Kokossis,et al.  The Role of Process Integration in Reviewing and Comparing Biorefinery Processing Routes , 2015 .

[40]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[41]  T. Foust,et al.  An economic and environmental comparison of a biochemical and a thermochemical lignocellulosic ethanol conversion processes , 2009 .

[42]  José Manuel Domínguez,et al.  Biotechnological production of xylitol. Part 1: Interest of xylitol and fundamentals of its biosynthesis , 1998 .

[43]  A. Hoekstra Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis , 2009 .

[44]  Prasant Kumar Rout,et al.  Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review , 2010 .

[45]  Jhuma Sadhukhan,et al.  Biorefineries and Chemical Processes: Design, Integration and Sustainability Analysis , 2014 .

[46]  A. Aden,et al.  Thermochemical Design Report: Thermochemical Ethanol via Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis of Lignocellulosic Biomass , 2007 .

[47]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Input-dependent life-cycle inventory model of industrial wastewater-treatment processes in the chemical sector. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[48]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Avoiding Co‐Product Allocation in Life‐Cycle Assessment , 2000 .