The Identification and Control of a Finger Exoskeleton for Grasping Rehabilitation

This paper evaluates the efficacy of different classical control architectures in performing grasping motion. The exoskeleton system was obtained via system identification method in which the input and output data was measured by means of current sensor (ACS712) and encoder attached to a DC geared motor (SPG30e-270k). The data obtained is split with a ratio of 70:30 for estimation and validation, respectively. The transfer function of the system is evaluated by varying the number of poles and zeros that are able to fit well with validation data. The performance of the classical P, PI, PD and PID control techniques were then evaluated in its ability to track the desired trajectory. It was demonstrated from the study that the PID controller provides the least steady state error as well as a reasonably fast settling time.

[1]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Version 8 of the Matlab System Identification Toolbox , 2012 .

[2]  Farshid Amirabdollahian,et al.  Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Andreas Wege,et al.  Development and Control of a Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation , 2006 .

[4]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Modeling and control of a curved pneumatic muscle actuator for wearable elbow exoskeleton , 2008 .

[5]  Soo-Jin Lee,et al.  Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering , 2012 .

[6]  G. Gini,et al.  An EMG-controlled exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[7]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  An EMG-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton for Natural Pinching , 2004, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[8]  R. Teasell,et al.  What's new in stroke rehabilitation: back to basics. , 2005, Stroke.

[9]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Yasuhisa Hasegawa,et al.  Wearable handling support system for paralyzed patient , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Francesco Giovacchini,et al.  Mechatronic Design and Characterization of the Index Finger Module of a Hand Exoskeleton for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[12]  William S. Harwin,et al.  Upper Limb Robot Mediated Stroke Therapy—GENTLE/s Approach , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[13]  T. Hansen,et al.  Hand Injuries in Agricultural Accidents , 1999, Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  S. Masiero,et al.  Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  Comparison of control strategies for an EMG controlled orthotic exoskeleton for the hand , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.