Systematisierung, Erklärungsbeiträge und Effekte von Innovationsbarrieren

ZusammenfassungInnovationsbarrieren sind ein häufig erwähntes, jedoch nur selten tiefergehend diskutiertes Forschungsgebiet. In dem vorliegenden Beitrag wird dieses für das Innovationsmanagement bedeutende Thema systematisch beleuchtet. Zunächst werden Innovationsbarrieren nach vier Dimensionen (Erscheinungsform, Wahrnehmungsebene, Ursprung sowie Zeitpunkt des Auftretens einer Barriere) klassifiziert. Als Erklärungsbeiträge für Innovationsbarrieren werden individuelle Charakteristika, organisationale Eigenschaften und Eigenschaften der Innovationsaufgabe identifiziert. Dabei werden unterschiedliche theoretische Perspektiven eingenommen. Darauf aufbauend wird die Wirkung der Innovationsbarrieren auf Organisationsmitglieder und auf die Innovation selbst diskutiert. Insbesondere werden sowohl positive als auch negative Aspekte von Innovationsbarrieren dargestellt. Der Beitrag dient dazu, eine Sensibilisierung für die Komplexität von Innovationsbarrieren zu erreichen. Ziel ist es, Ansatzpunkte für die zukünftige Forschung zu entwickeln, um die theoretischen Erkenntnisse weiter zu vertiefen. AbstractBarriers to innovation represent a research topic which is frequently cited but seldom investigated in depth. This article contains a systematic approach to this important subject for innovation management. The authors suggest classifying barriers to innovation using four dimensions (form of appearance, level of perception, origin, and time of appearance of a barrier). Individual, organizational, and task characteristics determine the barriers to innovation. Various theoretical perspectives are considered for the purpose of identification. The effect of barriers to innovation on individuals and on the innovation itself is also discussed, and the positive as well as negative aspects of barriers to innovation are shown. This article aims to create awareness of the complexity of barriers to innovation, with a view to developing points of departure for future research in order to deepen our theoretical understanding of these barriers.

[1]  J. Boonstra,et al.  Technological and organizational innovation: A dilemma of fundamental change and participation. , 1996 .

[2]  Bas Hillebrand,et al.  Unraveling willingness to cannibalize: a closer look at the barrier to radical innovation , 2005 .

[3]  John Coopey,et al.  Managers' Innovations as ‘Sense‐making’ , 1997 .

[4]  Larisa V. Shavinina.  The international handbook on innovation , 2003 .

[5]  Hanne Harmsen,et al.  Overcoming the barriers to market‐oriented product development , 1995 .

[6]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Technological Innovation and Firm Inertia , 1996 .

[7]  Marko Elovainio,et al.  Is Underutilization of Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities a Major Barrier to Innovation? , 2004, Psychological reports.

[8]  L. A. Folkerts,et al.  Promotoren in Innovationsprozessen – Empirische Untersuchung zur personellen Dynamik , 2001 .

[9]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[10]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[11]  Empirische Determinanten des Widerstandes von Mitarbeitern gegen Innovationen , 2003 .

[12]  W. Danis,et al.  Business Strategy Types and Innovative Practices , 2006 .

[13]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Institutions and systems in the geography of innovation , 2002 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[15]  John Storey,et al.  THE MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION PROBLEM , 2000 .

[16]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[17]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[18]  Hung-Kei Tang,et al.  Innovation under Constraints: The Case of Singapore , 2003 .

[19]  C. Gilbert.  Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[20]  R. Lazarus.  Psychological stress and the coping process , 1970 .

[21]  Sören Salomo,et al.  Je innovativer, desto erfolgreicher? , 2005 .

[22]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation , 1977 .

[23]  Ralf Lanwehr,et al.  Innovationsförderliche Öffnungsprozesse : "Je mehr, desto besser?" Die Linearitätsannahme auf dem Prüfstand , 2001 .

[24]  D. Krause.  Innovationsförderliche Führung - Eine empirische Analyse , 2005 .

[25]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[26]  D. E. Krause.  Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation , 2004 .

[27]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II , 1993 .

[28]  Fabrice Galia,et al.  Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France , 2004 .

[29]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Arbeitsteilung im Innovationsmanagement , 1998 .

[30]  José F. B. Gieskes,et al.  Learning barriers in continuous product innovation , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[31]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of product innovations: defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior , 2005 .

[32]  Carine Peeters,et al.  Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms , 2006 .

[33]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Cultures that support product-innovation processes , 2002 .

[34]  G. Lynn,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Unlearning in New Product Development Teams , 2006 .

[35]  J. Schumpeter.  Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung , 1913 .

[36]  K. Lewin.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[37]  F. Nerdinger,et al.  Führung und Innovation , 2003 .

[38]  Athanasios Hadjimanolis,et al.  The Barriers Approach to Innovation , 2003 .

[39]  S Greenland,et al.  Principles of multilevel modelling. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[40]  D. Dougherty,et al.  The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms , 1994 .

[41]  Dominique Tourigny,et al.  Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms , 2004 .

[42]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[43]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[44]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[45]  C. Lettl,et al.  Formale und informale Determinanten des Innovationserfolges: Eine kritische Analyse des Zusammenspiels der Kräfte am Beispiel der Innovatorenrollen , 2006 .

[46]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[47]  S. Markham.  Corporate Championing and Antagonism as Forms of Political Behavior: An R&D Perspective , 2000 .

[48]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[49]  Scott Shane,et al.  Uncertainty Avoidance and the Preference for Innovation Championing Roles , 1995 .

[50]  Yolanda Sarason,et al.  Facilitators of organizational innovation: The role of life-cycle stage , 1996 .

[51]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[52]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[53]  Wolf Böhnisch,et al.  Personale Widerstände bei der Durchsetzung von Innovationen , 1979 .

[54]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[55]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Organization and strategy in the evolution of the enterprise , 1996 .

[57]  William Keogh,et al.  Managing Innovation991Joe Tidd, John Bessant, Keith Pavitt. Managing Innovation. Chichester: Wiley 1997. , 1999 .

[58]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[59]  H. Hauschildt.  Widerstand gegen Innovationen — destruktiv oder konstruktiv? , 1999 .

[60]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  Sören Salomo,et al.  Konzept und Messung des Innovationsgrades – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie zu innovativen Entwicklungsvorhaben , 2003 .

[62]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Why new industrial products fail , 1975 .

[63]  Rajesh K. Chandy,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development , 2006 .

[64]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[65]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[66]  Gaylen N. Chandler,et al.  Unraveling the Determinants and Consequences of an Innovation-Supportive Organizational Culture , 2000 .

[67]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  Theorien der Sozialpsychologie , 1976 .

[68]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Barriers to Innovation in Service Industries in Canada , 2002 .

[69]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers , 2001 .

[70]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Inertia in Japanese Organizations: Knowledge Management Routines and Failure to Innovate , 2006 .

[71]  Claudia Bird Schoonhoven,et al.  Community, Population, and Organization Effects on Innovation: A Multilevel Perspective , 1996 .

[72]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors , 2006 .

[73]  André Piatier,et al.  Barriers to innovation , 1984 .

[74]  H. Schwarzwald.  Theorie des Geldes und der Umlaufsmittel. Von Ludwig von Mises. Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot. 1912 , 1913 .

[75]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Factors influencing new product success and failure in small entrepreneurial high-technology electronics firms , 1994 .

[76]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .