Conditioned suppression studies with rats explored the informational content of a backward conditioned inhibitor. Pairings of an unconditioned stimulus (US) and Stimulus 1 (US-->S1) established S1 as an inhibitor in Experiment 1. Pairing the inhibitor S1 with a novel S2 (S2-->S1) promoted excitatory second-order conditioning (SOC) to S2, which suggested S1 was well associated with the US. Degrading presumed S1-US associations in Experiment 2 by S1- (extinction) treatment eliminated S2's excitation while preserving S1's inhibition. Experiments 3 and 4 converged in showing that S2 was not an excitor when Pavlovian conditioned inhibition (CI) was the inhibitory treatment prior to the SOC phase, but instead acted as a second-order inhibitor. Results are discussed in relation to the temporal coding hypothesis, the SOP ("sometimes opponent process") and Rescorla-Wagner models of conditioning, and the associative structure of SOC. Also, the data suggest that backward inhibition is special and that not all forms of CI are equal.
[1]
F. J. McGuigan,et al.
Contemporary approaches to conditioning and learning
,
1973
.
[2]
W. F. Prokasy,et al.
Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
,
1972
.
[3]
N. Mackintosh.
The psychology of animal learning
,
1974
.
[4]
H. Terrace,et al.
Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory
,
1980
.
[5]
B. Skinner,et al.
Principles of Behavior
,
1944
.
[6]
Ralph R. Miller,et al.
Information processing in animals : memory mechanisms
,
1983
.