The History of Moral Certainty as the Pre-History of Typicality

This paper investigates the historical origin and ancestors of typicality, which is now a central concept in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics and Bohmian Mechanics. Although Ludwig Boltzmann did not use the word typicality, its main idea, namely, that something happens almost always or is valid for almost all cases, plays a crucial role for his explanation of how thermodynamic systems approach equilibrium. At the beginning of the 20th century, the focus on almost always or almost everywhere was fruitful for developing measure theory and probability theory. It was apparently Hugh Everett III who first mentioned typicality in physics in 1957 while searching for a justification of the Born rule in his interpretation of quantum mechanics. The historically closest concept before these developments is moral certainty, which was invented by the medieval French theologian Jean Gerson, and it became a standard concept at least until the Age of Enlightenment, when Jakob Bernoulli proved the Law of Large numbers.

[1]  D. Thorstad Why bounded rationality (in epistemology)? , 2023, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

[2]  K. Robertson In Search of the Holy Grail: How to Reduce the Second Law of Thermodynamics , 2021, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Isaac Wilhelm The Typical Principle , 2022, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[4]  V. Allori The paradox of deterministic probabilities , 2022, Inquiry.

[5]  Michael Samjetsabam Moral Certainty of Faculty of Reason in Descartes’ Discourse , 2021, Tattva - Journal of Philosophy.

[6]  Mario Hubert,et al.  Reviving frequentism , 2020, Synthese.

[7]  T. Maudlin The Grammar of Typicality , 2020 .

[8]  G. Wagner Typicality and Minutis Rectis Laws: From Physics to Sociology , 2020 .

[9]  J. Lebowitz,et al.  Gibbs and Boltzmann Entropy in Classical and Quantum Mechanics , 2019, Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation.

[10]  M. Vogel Atoms, mechanics, and probability: Ludwig Boltzmann’s statistico-mechanical writings – an exegesis, by O. Darrigol , 2018 .

[11]  Danielson Dennis The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution , 2017 .

[12]  E. Sylla Probability in 17th- and 18th-century Continental Europe from the Perspective of Jacob Bernoulli’s Art of Conjecturing , 2016 .

[13]  M. Esfeld,et al.  From the Universe to Subsystems: Why Quantum Mechanics Appears More Stochastic than Classical Mechanics , 2016, 1604.00987.

[14]  David Wootton,et al.  Invention of science : a new history of the scientific revolution , 2015 .

[15]  Dustin Lazarovici,et al.  Typicality, Irreversibility and the Status of Macroscopic Laws , 2015 .

[16]  J. Lennox,et al.  Episteme, demonstration, and explanation: A fresh look at Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics , 2014 .

[17]  Jürgen Renn,et al.  The emergence of statistical mechanics , 2013 .

[18]  Roman Frigg,et al.  Demystifying Typicality , 2012, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  G. Leibniz,et al.  Philosophical papers and letters. , 2011 .

[20]  R. Ariew The New Matter Theory and Its Epistemology: Descartes (and Late Scholastics) on Hypotheses and Moral Certainty , 2010 .

[21]  J. Lebowitz,et al.  Long-time behavior of macroscopic quantum systems , 2010, 1003.2129.

[22]  R. Frigg,et al.  Typicality and the Approach to Equilibrium in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics , 2009, Philosophy of Science.

[23]  Rudolf Schüssler Jean Gerson, moral certainty and the Renaissance of ancient Scepticism , 2009 .

[24]  Stefan Teufel,et al.  Bohmian Mechanics: The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory , 2009 .

[25]  M. Pakaluk Aristotle , 2008, The Classical Review.

[26]  Joel Lebowitz,et al.  Time's arrow and Boltzmann's entropy , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[27]  S. B. Volchan Probability as typicality , 2006, physics/0611172.

[28]  Alison Simmons Sensible Ends: Latent Teleology in Descartes' Account of Sensation , 2003 .

[29]  L. Floridi Sextus Empiricus: The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism , 2002 .

[30]  S. Goldstein Boltzmann's Approach to Statistical Mechanics , 2001, cond-mat/0105242.

[31]  A. Hald A history of mathematical statistics from 1750 to 1930 , 1998 .

[32]  Joel L. Lebowitz,et al.  Macroscopic laws, microscopic dynamics, time's arrow and Boltzmann's entropy , 1993 .

[33]  D. Dürr,et al.  Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty , 1992, quant-ph/0308039.

[34]  W. E. Morris,et al.  The Philosophical Writings of Descartes , 1989 .

[35]  G. Rogers Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England , 1985 .

[36]  Stephen G. Brush,et al.  Nineteenth-Century Physics. (Book Reviews: The Kind of Motion We Call Heat. A History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases in the 19th Century) , 1978 .

[37]  A. Alexandrova The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1965, Nature.

[38]  Theodore Waldman Origins of the Legal Doctrine of Reasonable Doubt , 1959 .

[39]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[40]  Rose Wimenitz James , 1924, The Psychological Clinic.

[41]  Milagros Mier,et al.  Descartes , 1852, Journal of psychological medicine and mental pathology.

[42]  Selections , 1817, The Medico-chirurgical journal and review.

[43]  J. Bricmont Making Sense of Statistical Mechanics , 2022, Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics.

[44]  W. Myrvold Explaining Thermodynamics: What Remains to be Done? , 2020, Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation.

[45]  M. Kolb,et al.  Einführung in die Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie als Theorie der Typizität , 2017 .

[46]  Breno Zuppolini Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning : The Posterior Analytics , 2017 .

[47]  Ute Beyer,et al.  Creating Modern Probability Its Mathematics Physics And Philosophy In Historical Perspective , 2016 .

[48]  J. Werlin The Art of Conjecturing , 2013 .

[49]  B. Shapiro Beyond Reasonable Doubt: The Evolution of a Concept , 2012 .

[50]  D. Bronstein The Origin and Aim of Posterior Analytics II.19 , 2012 .

[51]  S. Goldstein Typicality and Notions of Probability in Physics , 2012 .

[52]  R. Frigg,et al.  Why Typicality Does Not Explain the Approach to Equilibrium , 2011 .

[53]  seguindo,et al.  INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION , 2004 .

[54]  Detlef Dürr,et al.  Bohmsche Mechanik als Grundlage der Quantenmechanik , 2001 .

[55]  R. Woolhouse John Locke and the Ethics of Belief , 1997 .

[56]  N. Wolterstorff John Locke and the Ethics of Belief: CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN RELIGION AND CRITICAL THOUGHT , 1996 .

[57]  J. Cottingham,et al.  The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1 , 1985 .

[58]  D. Lewis A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance , 1980 .