Information technology-enabled explorative learning and competitive performance in industrial service SMEs: a configurational analysis

As purveyors of knowledge-based and high value-added services to the manufacturing sector, industrial service small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must develop the information technology (IT) capabilities that, in combination with other non-IT capabilities, enable their capacity for organizational learning (OL) and for explorative learning in particular. In this context, this study aims to identify the different causal configurations that account for the nonlinear complex interplay of IT capabilities for exploration and strategic capabilities for explorative learning as they affect these firms’ competitive performance.,Survey data obtained from 92 industrial service SMEs were analyzed with a configurational approach, using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA).,As it allows for equifinality, the fsQCA analysis identified two sets of causal configurations that characterize the sampled firms’ explorative learning capability as it relates to competitive performance. In the first set, two configurations were equally associated with high innovation performance, whereas in the second set, four configurations were equally associated with high productivity.,By viewing explorative learning as a dynamic capability that is enabled by the firm’s IT and strategic capabilities, the study contributes to OL theory by providing a more concrete or “operational” grounding, which allows for a greater practical applicability of this theory. By taking both the configurational and capability-based views of the OL-IT-performance causal framework, the authors provide an empirical basis for unraveling, explaining and understanding the complex non-linear relationships embedded within this framework.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[2]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Information Systems Strategy and Strategy-as-Practice: A joint agenda , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Manufacturing practices, strategic fit and performance: A routine‐based view , 2004 .

[4]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[5]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  The Role of Business Intelligence and Communication Technologies in Organizational Agility: A Configurational Approach , 2017, Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

[6]  Yong-Hui Li,et al.  Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Leveraging Digital Technologies: How Information Quality Leads to Localized Capabilities and Customer Service Performance , 2013, MIS Q..

[8]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility? , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Mahmoud M. Yasin,et al.  The role of people and social context in promoting the IT organizational performance , 2016 .

[10]  P. Ahmed,et al.  Dynamic capabilities: A review and research , 2007 .

[11]  Philip McCann,et al.  Why firm size matters: investigating the drivers of innovation and economic performance in New Zealand using the Business Operations Survey , 2016 .

[12]  Janet R. McColl-Kennedy,et al.  The central role of knowledge integration capability in service innovation-based competitive strategy , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[13]  DongJohn Qi,et al.  Information technology and organizational learning in knowledge alliances and networks , 2015 .

[14]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[15]  Mohamed Sulaiman,et al.  Does Organizational Learning Matter , 2015 .

[16]  Fakhraddin Maroofi,et al.  STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE , 2013 .

[17]  Peer C. Fiss A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[18]  Ruben Pereira,et al.  A knowledge management approach to capture organizational learning networks , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[19]  Antonio Sartal,et al.  How Can Firms’ Basic Research Turn Into Product Innovation? The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Industry Appropriability , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[20]  Jane Webster,et al.  An Investigation of Information Systems Use Patterns: Technological Events as Triggers, the Effect of Time, and Consequences for Performance , 2013, MIS Q..

[21]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An Examination of the Relationship between Absorptive Capacity and Organizational Learning, and a Proposed Integration , 2008 .

[23]  Peer C. Fiss,et al.  Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research , 2013 .

[24]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  Entry Mode, Organizational Learning and R&D in Foreign Affiliates: Evidence from japanese Firms , 2003 .

[25]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Reducing Status Effects with Computer-Mediated Communication: Evidence from Two Distinct National Cultures , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[27]  L. Raymond,et al.  IT-enabled Knowledge Management for the Competitive Performance of Manufacturing SMEs: An Absorptive Capacity-based View , 2016 .

[28]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Prospering in a transition economy through information technology‐supported organizational learning , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Zhilin Yang,et al.  How does organizational learning matter in strategic business performance? The contingency role of guanxi networking , 2015 .

[30]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[31]  Knut Koschatzky,et al.  The emergence of new modes of R&D services in Germany , 2010 .

[32]  Jason Madan,et al.  Economic evaluation of the practical approach to lung health and informal provider interventions for improving the detection of tuberculosis and chronic airways disease at primary care level in Malawi: study protocol for cost-effectiveness analysis , 2015, Implementation Science.

[33]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  The impact of social information system governance, utilization, and capabilities on absorptive capacity and innovation: A case of Austrian SMEs , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Will enterprise social networking systems promote knowledge management and organizational learning? An empirical study , 2018, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[35]  Diego Aboal,et al.  Innovation and productivity in services and manufacturing: The role of ICT investment , 2015 .

[36]  Lowell L. Bryan The new metrics of corporate performance : Profit per employee , 2007 .

[37]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[38]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy , 2016 .

[39]  E. Jayanti,et al.  Open sourced organizational learning: implications and challenges of crowdsourcing for human resource development (HRD) practitioners , 2012 .

[40]  Christian Rammer,et al.  Local User-Producer Interaction in Innovation and Export Performance of Firms , 2006 .

[41]  John R. Bryson,et al.  The Creation and Growth of Small Business Service Firms in Post-Industrial Britain , 1997 .

[42]  W. Orlikowski The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[43]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[45]  G. Clarke,et al.  Business environment, economic agglomeration and job creation around the world , 2013 .

[46]  Louis Raymond,et al.  HRM capabilities as a determinant and enabler of productivity for manufacturing SMEs , 2010 .

[47]  O. A. Sawy,et al.  Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights , 2013 .

[48]  Shu Han,et al.  Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Barry Cooper,et al.  Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: an illustration from the sociology of education , 2016 .

[50]  Thi Nguyet Que Nguyen,et al.  Realising the value of knowledge resources and capabilities: an empirical study , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[51]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[52]  Whitney Berta,et al.  Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory , 2015, Implementation Science.

[53]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[54]  Jifeng Mu,et al.  Networking Capability and New Product Development , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[55]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[56]  Jan Dul,et al.  Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA , 2016 .

[57]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration , 2012 .

[59]  Anis Khedhaouria,et al.  Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing , 2017 .

[60]  C KaneGerald,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[61]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Embeddedness of Organizational Capabilities , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[62]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[63]  S. Snell,et al.  THE STRATEGIC USE OF INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION , 1996 .

[64]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Ambidexterity in R&D: Linking Technology Alliance Diversity and Firm Innovation , 2016 .

[65]  Hao Hu,et al.  Strategic HRM and organisational learning in the Chinese private sector during second-pioneering , 2016 .

[66]  EvenAdir,et al.  Business intelligence and organizational learning , 2017 .

[67]  John Qi Dong,et al.  Information technology and organizational learning in knowledge alliances and networks: Evidence from U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[68]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[69]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[70]  Diana Benito-Osorio,et al.  The international diversification-performance link in Spain: Does firm size really matter? , 2016 .

[71]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems , 1995 .

[73]  J. Hassid,et al.  Internationalisation and human resources development in European small firms: a comparative study , 2006 .

[74]  Xiaoxu Dong,et al.  The Relationships Among Firm Size, Innovation Type, and Export Performance With Regard to Time Spans , 2015 .

[75]  David T. Croasdell It's Role in Organizational Memory and Learning , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[76]  Marc Day,et al.  Exploitation and exploration learning and the development of organizational capabilities: A cross-case analysis of the Russian oil industry , 2007 .

[77]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research , 2000 .

[78]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Reflections on the 2013 Decade Award—“Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited” Ten Years Later , 2015 .

[79]  C. Gelhard,et al.  IT infrastructure and competitive aggressiveness in explaining and predicting performance , 2016 .

[80]  Slaðana Cabrilo,et al.  How strategic knowledge management drives intellectual capital to superior innovation and market performance , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[81]  R. Pellerin,et al.  The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0 , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[82]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[83]  Barry Cooper,et al.  Exploring the consequences of a recalibration of causal conditions when assessing sufficiency with fuzzy set QCA , 2014 .

[84]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  When the Recipe Is More Important Than the Ingredients , 2014 .

[85]  J. Roldán,et al.  Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competencies , 2006 .

[86]  F. Barry FDI, transfer pricing and the measurement of R&D intensity , 2005 .

[87]  Mustafa Tepeci,et al.  Organizational Learning Capability and its Impact on Firm Innovativeness , 2014 .

[88]  Tiago Neves Sequeira,et al.  Relationship between growth and R&D intensity in low‐tech and high‐tech Portuguese service SMEs , 2010 .

[89]  Peter Naudé,et al.  Exploring the relationship between network competence, network capability and firm performance : a resource-based perspective in an emerging economy , 2009 .

[90]  J. Walkup Fuzzy-set social science , 2003 .

[91]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[92]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Fuzzy set analysis as a means to understand users of 21st-century learning systems: The case of mobile learning and reflections on learning analytics research , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[93]  M. Cseh,et al.  The Meaning of Organizational Learning , 2015 .

[94]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Organisational learning and core capabilities development: the role of IT , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[95]  Sinan Aral,et al.  I.T. Assets, Organizational Capabilities and Firm Performance: Do Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation? , 2007 .

[96]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning: A Critical Application of the 4i Model , 2018, British Journal of Management.

[97]  Michael Goul,et al.  The Design, Development, and Validation of a Knowledge-Based Organizational Learning Support System , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[99]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Strategic Capabilities and Radical Innovation: An Empirical Study in Three Countries , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[100]  Terri Scott,et al.  A consideration of the roles of business intelligence and e-business in management and marketing decision making in knowledge-based and high-tech start-ups , 2004 .

[101]  Jyotsna Bhatnagar,et al.  Predictors of organizational commitment in India: strategic HR roles, organizational learning capability and psychological empowerment , 2007 .

[102]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[103]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[104]  Ulrike de Brentani Firm size: Implications for achieving success in new industrial services , 1995 .

[105]  J. Aldás-Manzano,et al.  Individual Performance in Turbulent Environments: The Role of Organizational Learning Capability and Employee Flexibility , 2016 .

[106]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union , 2019, Comput. Ind..

[107]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  The peculiarities of knowledge management processes in SMEs: the case of Singapore , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[108]  Narendra M. Agrawal,et al.  HR and IT capabilities and complementarities in knowledge-intensive services , 2010 .

[109]  Joanne Ho,et al.  Reputation in higher education: A fuzzy set analysis of resource configurations ☆ , 2016 .

[110]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[111]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[112]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[113]  S. Liao,et al.  Relationships among organizational culture, knowledge acquisition, organizational learning, and organizational innovation in Taiwan's banking and insurance industries , 2012 .

[114]  María del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes,et al.  Knowledge combination, innovation, organizational performance in technology firms , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[115]  Victor Oltra,et al.  Boosting organizational learning through team-based talent management: what is the evidence from large Spanish firms? , 2013 .

[116]  Knut Koschatzky The emergence of new modes of R&D services in Germany , 2010 .

[117]  Josée St-Pierre,et al.  The complementarity of IT and HRM capabilities for competitive performance: a configurational analysis of manufacturing and industrial service SMEs , 2018, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[118]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[119]  C. Annique Un,et al.  Learning from R&D outsourcing vs. learning by R&D outsourcing , 2017 .

[120]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[121]  WhittingtonRichard Information Systems Strategy and Strategy-as-Practice , 2014 .

[122]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach , 2016 .

[123]  M. Zedtwitz Organizational Learning through Post-project Reviews in R&D , 2002 .

[124]  Bettina Peters,et al.  Internationalisation, innovation and productivity in services: evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom , 2018, Review of World Economics.

[125]  Adir Even,et al.  Business intelligence and organizational learning: An empirical investigation of value creation processes , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[126]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Learning as a Foundation of Electronic Commerce in the Network Organization , 2000, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[127]  Susanne Durst,et al.  Knowledge Management in SMEs: A Literature Review , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[128]  Zafar Husain,et al.  The impact of networking on competitiveness via organizational learning, employee innovativeness, and innovation process , 2016 .

[129]  Mei Cao,et al.  Exploring the absorptive capacity to innovation/productivity link for individual engineers engaged in IT enabled work , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[130]  Naresh Khatri,et al.  Building HR Capability in Health Care Organizations , 2006, Health care management review.

[131]  Henrik Bresman Changing Routines: A Process Model of Vicarious Group Learning in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2013 .

[132]  A. Woodside Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory , 2013 .

[133]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[134]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Organizational Learning with Crowdsourcing: The Revelatory Case of LEGO , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[135]  Sally K. Widener,et al.  The Performance Effects of Using Business Intelligence Systems for Exploitation and Exploration Learning , 2016, J. Inf. Syst..

[136]  ChoudrieJyoti,et al.  The impact of social information system governance, utilization, and capabilities on absorptive capacity and innovation , 2016 .

[137]  Isabel M. Prieto,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: An Integrative Role for Learning? , 2008 .

[138]  Giacomo Marzi,et al.  Knowledge Management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Mapping the Literature and Scoping Future Avenues , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[139]  Tendai Chikweche,et al.  A systematic review of future research challenges and prospects of organizational learning research in small medium size enterprises , 2018 .

[140]  Stephen Eldridge,et al.  Improving productivity through strategic alignment of competitive capabilities , 2019, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

[141]  Danny Miller,et al.  Strategy from the inside Out: Building Capability-Creating Organizations , 2002 .

[142]  Brigitte Kroon,et al.  High performance work practices in small firms: a resource-poverty and strategic decision-making perspective , 2013 .

[143]  Delio Ignacio Castaneda,et al.  Is organizational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[144]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Strategic capability configurations for the internationalization of SMEs: A study in equifinality , 2013 .

[145]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani Wap: Transitional Technology for M-Commerce , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[146]  Jane Webster,et al.  Combining variance and process in information systems research: Hybrid approaches , 2017, Inf. Organ..

[147]  Vassilis Kostakos,et al.  Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: a methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities , 2017, Inf. Syst. J..