INTERLANGUAGE AS CHAMELEON1
暂无分享,去创建一个
The clam is made that Labov's “Observor's Paradox” and the fire methodological axioms leading to this paradox apply to inter language Thus, we may mew interlanguage as a continuum of styles, which is defined by the amount of attention paid to speech; the most systematic second-language learner speech is produced when the learner is paying the least attention to speech. Yet, when we do research, the presence of the researcher and the tasks presented to the learner, lead our subjects to pay attention to their speech. Therefore, we cannot claim that research can ever observe the most truly systematic form of a learner's interlanguage—unattended or “unmonitored” speech. The methodological implications of the claim are explored, and recommendations for research are made.
[1] D. Freeman,et al. The Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes by Adult ESL Students. , 1975 .
[2] S. Krashen. IS THE “NATURAL ORDER” AN ARTIFACT OF THE BILINGUAL SYNTAX MEASURE? , 1978 .
[3] Christian Adjémian,et al. ON THE NATURE OF INTERLANGUAGE SYSTEMS , 1976 .
[4] Marina K. Burt,et al. Some Guidelines for the Assessment of Oral Language Proficiency and Dominance. , 1978 .
[5] Lonna J. Dickerson. The Learner's Interlanguage as a System of Variable Rules. , 1975 .