The Effects of Hurdle Rates on the Level of Escalation of Commitment in Capital Budgeting

This study proposes that organizations should consider project hurdle rates, as part of their control system design, to reduce escalation of commitment behavior in managers. In particular, we empirically examined the escalation of commitment tendencies in managers receiving organization‐set, self‐set, and no hurdle rates. Consistent with prior expectations, we found self‐set hurdle rates to be an effective control mechanism resulting in significantly lower levels of escalation of commitment. Contrary to expectations, however, organization‐set hurdle rates were not effective. Self‐set hurdle rates also resulted in significantly higher cut‐off rates compared to the average return of the investment portfolio held by the managers. As escalation of commitment has been recognized as a serious potential problem in organizations, the use of self‐set hurdle rates is a step toward reducing the level of escalation tendencies in managers.

[1]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[2]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[3]  J. Brockner.  The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[4]  P. Harrison,et al.  IMPACT OF 'ADVERSE SELECTION' ON MANAGERS' PROJECT EVALUATION DECISIONS , 1993 .

[5]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[6]  Robert-Vincent Joule,et al.  A radical point of view on dissonance theory. , 2019, Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.)..

[7]  B. M. Staw.  The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[8]  Joanna L. Y. Ho,et al.  Opportunism in Capital Budget Recommendations: The Effects of Past Performance and Its Attributions , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[9]  A. Teger,et al.  Too Much Invested to Quit , 1980 .

[10]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Face-Saving and Entrapment , 1981 .

[11]  Patricia J. Holahan,et al.  Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  THE ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT IN SEQUENTIAL DECISION MAKING: SITUATIONAL AND PERSONAL MODERATORS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS* , 1986 .

[13]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach , 1993 .

[14]  Robert W. Rutledge,et al.  The influence of self-interest and ethical considerations on managers evaluation judgments 1 The da , 1999 .

[15]  吳安妮,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Managers Project Evaluation Decisions , 1999 .

[16]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment in an experimenting society: A study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. , 1980 .

[17]  Chee W. Chow,et al.  Escalating Commitment to Unprofitable Projects: Replication and Cross-Cultural Extension , 1997 .

[18]  Esbjörn Segelod.  The content and role of the investment manual : A research note , 1997 .

[19]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions , 1986 .

[20]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[21]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  D. Ilgen,et al.  Individual's reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective , 1984 .

[23]  Michael G. Bowen.  The Escalation Phenomenon Reconsidered: Decision Dilemmas or Decision Errors? , 1987 .

[24]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: Quitting before it's too late , 1979 .

[25]  Peter F. Luckett,et al.  Feedback and management accounting: A review of research into behavioural consequences , 1991 .

[26]  Mark Keil,et al.  ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARISON OF THREE THEORIES. , 1995 .

[27]  Rick Antle,et al.  Information Rents and Preferences among Information Systems in a Model of Resource Allocation , 1995 .

[28]  Paul Harrison,et al.  An incentive to shirk, privately held information, and managers' project evaluation decisions , 1994 .

[29]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Diffusibility of Blame: Effects on Persistence in a Project , 1987 .

[30]  A. C. Rogers,et al.  De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration : when sunk costs and negative feedback coincide , 1990 .